TheEvilDetector
11-04-2007, 05:27 PM
Below you will find the text. The interesting points are bolded.
I have analysed these sections at the end.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/text-president-bushs-weekly-radio/story.aspx?guid=%7BC5538144-21D9-45C7-B77D-567CD9C9CBD0%7D
"
Text of President Bush's weekly radio address
By MarketWatch
Good morning. On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Judge Michael Mukasey's nomination to be our next Attorney General. I thank the committee for scheduling this vote. I urge them to approve this fine man's nomination, and send it to the full Senate as quickly as possible.
In a time of war, it is vital for the President to have a full national security team in place -- and the Attorney General is a key member of that team. The Attorney General is America's top law enforcement officer, with critical responsibilities for preventing terrorist attacks and protecting our Nation.
Judge Mukasey is uniquely qualified to fill this vital role. He served nearly two decades on the Federal bench, and some of his most important legal experience is in the area of national security. He presided over the trial of the terrorist known as "the Blind Sheikh" and his co-defendants in the conspiracy to destroy prominent New York City landmarks, including the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. And when the World Trade Center was attacked again on September the 11th, 2001, Judge Mukasey quickly reopened his court, even though it was just blocks from Ground Zero. He and other judges in his district worked day and night to ensure that applications for warrants were processed, investigations could proceed, and the rule of law was upheld.
This is the kind of leader America needs to head the Department of Justice at this important moment in our history. Judge Mukasey is a man of achievement. He is a man of character. And he has been praised by Republicans and Democrats alike for his honesty, intellect, fairness, and independence.
Since I sent his nomination to the Senate, Judge Mukasey has provided nearly six hours of testimony. He patiently answered more than 200 questions during his hearings, and he responded promptly to nearly 500 written questions. Yet some senators are working against his nomination because they want him to take a position on the legality of specific techniques allegedly used to question captured terrorists.
As Judge Mukasey explained in a letter to Judiciary Committee members, he cannot give such a legal opinion for several reasons. First, he does not know whether certain methods of questioning are in fact used, because the program is classified, he's not been given access to that information, and therefore he is in no position to provide an informed opinion. Second, he does not want our professional interrogators in the field to take an uninformed opinion he has given in the course of a confirmation hearing as meaning that any conduct of theirs has put them in legal jeopardy.
Finally, he does not want an uninformed legal opinion to give terrorists a window into which techniques we may use, and which we may not. That could help them train their operatives to resist questioning, and withhold vital information we need to stop attacks and save lives.
Congressional leaders should not make Judge Mukasey's confirmation dependent on his willingness to make a public judgment about a classified program he has not been briefed on. If the Senate Judiciary Committee were to block Judge Mukasey on these grounds, it would set a new standard for confirmation that could not be met by any responsible nominee for Attorney General. And that would guarantee that America would have no confirmed Attorney General during this time of war.
Senate leaders should move Judge Mukasey's nomination out of Committee and bring it to the Senate floor for an up or down vote. In this time of war, America needs the best people leading our efforts to protect the American people. With Judge Mukasey serving as Attorney General, our national security team will be stronger -- and the Senate should confirm this good man as quickly as possible.
Thank you for listening. "
The article sets out the guy as a great man for the post. Ok, fair enough. Then he says senators are trying to block the
nomination because they want the man's opinion on certain torture techniques? Nice way of making the senators look
bad for trying to do their job.
Then it goes on to say, that the man should not give legal opinions because the program is classified. So forget all the
preamble about how knowledgeable and experienced and fair and independent etc this man is. It is not important what
he has done, the fact that he doesnt know precisely what is being used is enough to stop him for speaking out about
what might be used.
Under this logic, the federal government can torture all it wants and mute any dissenting voices with the "its classified"
call. Cruel and Unusual Punishments? Hell Yeah. Noone can judge us on anything.
Then he makes statements that almost amount to confession of using torture, by saying that he doesn't want the
professional operatives to worry about legality of their methods and that terrorists could resist if they knew our methods,
implying that the methods that are used now cannot be resisted because they are secret, which is really saying that they
are using torture if you are able to read between the lines.
Then he says that congressional leaders should not make a judgement about a man based on how he views torture
techniques.
If you are an observant reader you will notice, plentiful references to what the congress should and should not do.
If I didn't know better it would seem that the King Bush is trying to tell congress how to run its business.
Let me finish up by saying this. Bush is absolutely lawless at this point, there is no more pretense of any rule of law.
It is rule of men, sadly.
I have analysed these sections at the end.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/text-president-bushs-weekly-radio/story.aspx?guid=%7BC5538144-21D9-45C7-B77D-567CD9C9CBD0%7D
"
Text of President Bush's weekly radio address
By MarketWatch
Good morning. On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Judge Michael Mukasey's nomination to be our next Attorney General. I thank the committee for scheduling this vote. I urge them to approve this fine man's nomination, and send it to the full Senate as quickly as possible.
In a time of war, it is vital for the President to have a full national security team in place -- and the Attorney General is a key member of that team. The Attorney General is America's top law enforcement officer, with critical responsibilities for preventing terrorist attacks and protecting our Nation.
Judge Mukasey is uniquely qualified to fill this vital role. He served nearly two decades on the Federal bench, and some of his most important legal experience is in the area of national security. He presided over the trial of the terrorist known as "the Blind Sheikh" and his co-defendants in the conspiracy to destroy prominent New York City landmarks, including the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. And when the World Trade Center was attacked again on September the 11th, 2001, Judge Mukasey quickly reopened his court, even though it was just blocks from Ground Zero. He and other judges in his district worked day and night to ensure that applications for warrants were processed, investigations could proceed, and the rule of law was upheld.
This is the kind of leader America needs to head the Department of Justice at this important moment in our history. Judge Mukasey is a man of achievement. He is a man of character. And he has been praised by Republicans and Democrats alike for his honesty, intellect, fairness, and independence.
Since I sent his nomination to the Senate, Judge Mukasey has provided nearly six hours of testimony. He patiently answered more than 200 questions during his hearings, and he responded promptly to nearly 500 written questions. Yet some senators are working against his nomination because they want him to take a position on the legality of specific techniques allegedly used to question captured terrorists.
As Judge Mukasey explained in a letter to Judiciary Committee members, he cannot give such a legal opinion for several reasons. First, he does not know whether certain methods of questioning are in fact used, because the program is classified, he's not been given access to that information, and therefore he is in no position to provide an informed opinion. Second, he does not want our professional interrogators in the field to take an uninformed opinion he has given in the course of a confirmation hearing as meaning that any conduct of theirs has put them in legal jeopardy.
Finally, he does not want an uninformed legal opinion to give terrorists a window into which techniques we may use, and which we may not. That could help them train their operatives to resist questioning, and withhold vital information we need to stop attacks and save lives.
Congressional leaders should not make Judge Mukasey's confirmation dependent on his willingness to make a public judgment about a classified program he has not been briefed on. If the Senate Judiciary Committee were to block Judge Mukasey on these grounds, it would set a new standard for confirmation that could not be met by any responsible nominee for Attorney General. And that would guarantee that America would have no confirmed Attorney General during this time of war.
Senate leaders should move Judge Mukasey's nomination out of Committee and bring it to the Senate floor for an up or down vote. In this time of war, America needs the best people leading our efforts to protect the American people. With Judge Mukasey serving as Attorney General, our national security team will be stronger -- and the Senate should confirm this good man as quickly as possible.
Thank you for listening. "
The article sets out the guy as a great man for the post. Ok, fair enough. Then he says senators are trying to block the
nomination because they want the man's opinion on certain torture techniques? Nice way of making the senators look
bad for trying to do their job.
Then it goes on to say, that the man should not give legal opinions because the program is classified. So forget all the
preamble about how knowledgeable and experienced and fair and independent etc this man is. It is not important what
he has done, the fact that he doesnt know precisely what is being used is enough to stop him for speaking out about
what might be used.
Under this logic, the federal government can torture all it wants and mute any dissenting voices with the "its classified"
call. Cruel and Unusual Punishments? Hell Yeah. Noone can judge us on anything.
Then he makes statements that almost amount to confession of using torture, by saying that he doesn't want the
professional operatives to worry about legality of their methods and that terrorists could resist if they knew our methods,
implying that the methods that are used now cannot be resisted because they are secret, which is really saying that they
are using torture if you are able to read between the lines.
Then he says that congressional leaders should not make a judgement about a man based on how he views torture
techniques.
If you are an observant reader you will notice, plentiful references to what the congress should and should not do.
If I didn't know better it would seem that the King Bush is trying to tell congress how to run its business.
Let me finish up by saying this. Bush is absolutely lawless at this point, there is no more pretense of any rule of law.
It is rule of men, sadly.