aroberso
11-04-2007, 01:16 PM
I've not stumbled into this before, so maybe this is new for you as well.
This poll seems to offer some objective polling data of RP vs. Hillary and Obama.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_paul_vs_clinton_and_obama
Here's some follow-up analysis on the poll that is unfavorably slanted, but still quite detailed.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/poll_matching_hillary_clinton_and_ron_paul_tells_a _lot_about_clinton_little_about_paul
The above follow-up was referenced in a Washington Post commentary today here (you have to sign in to view it, but its free):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103100624.html?sub=new
The last sentence in the Washington Post article says it all!!
"Maybe the Ron Paul factor is stronger than we thought."
Am I dreaming? Is this grudgingly positive MSM support?
This poll seems to offer some objective polling data of RP vs. Hillary and Obama.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_paul_vs_clinton_and_obama
Here's some follow-up analysis on the poll that is unfavorably slanted, but still quite detailed.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/poll_matching_hillary_clinton_and_ron_paul_tells_a _lot_about_clinton_little_about_paul
The above follow-up was referenced in a Washington Post commentary today here (you have to sign in to view it, but its free):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103100624.html?sub=new
The last sentence in the Washington Post article says it all!!
"Maybe the Ron Paul factor is stronger than we thought."
Am I dreaming? Is this grudgingly positive MSM support?