Knightskye
08-18-2011, 12:14 AM
politico.com/news/stories/0811/61555.html
But there are reasons why Paul, and his fan base, might be grateful for the minimalist coverage that he's received, because a more thorough vetting of the kind that mainstream candidates generally receive would invariably lead to some of the newsletters that bore his name (if not his byline or direct authorship) decades earlier.During the last campaign, a 3rd place showing in the Iowa Caucus provoked the article in The New Republic, which was then covered on every network. This was followed by Paul's exclusion a couple days later from Fox News' New Hampshire debate.
Imagine if he wins in Iowa.
But there are reasons why Paul, and his fan base, might be grateful for the minimalist coverage that he's received, because a more thorough vetting of the kind that mainstream candidates generally receive would invariably lead to some of the newsletters that bore his name (if not his byline or direct authorship) decades earlier.During the last campaign, a 3rd place showing in the Iowa Caucus provoked the article in The New Republic, which was then covered on every network. This was followed by Paul's exclusion a couple days later from Fox News' New Hampshire debate.
Imagine if he wins in Iowa.