realtonygoodwin
08-12-2011, 12:51 AM
Here is my assessment of how each candidate did.
Mitt Romney: did fine. I like his state's rights answer on healthcare. For his campaign: B+. He doesn't hurt himself, and maintains his lead. Me personally: B-
Santorum: Seemed like Pawlenty SNL impersonator. Got more passionate as it went on, and wasn't afraid to stand alone. Bad on policy except abortion. Campaign: C. Me: F+
Jon Huntsman: first chance to introduce himself to many, and he didn't do very well. Gets a few points for sticking with some of his unpopular positions. Campaign: D. Me: D
Pawlenty: fun to watch, but reeked of desperation going after Bachmann. Campaign:C-. Me: D+
Bachmann: Did pretty well, but not as good as last time. Nice rhetoric mostly. Gracious in submission question. Campaign: B. Me: C
Gingrich: did well, seemed professorial. May have helped his dying campaign. Campaign: A-. Me: B
Paul: better than before, still somewhat ramble prone. Schooled Santorum on foreign policy and history, but I doubt he expanded his appeal a whole lot. Campaign: C. Me:A
Cain: lacks substance, and experience. Had a couple good lines. Campaign: C-. Me: C-
So overall rankings:
How much they helped their campaign:
1. Gingrich
2. Romney
3. Bachmann
4. Paul
5. Santorum
6. Cain
7. Pawlenty
8. Huntsman
How well they appealed to me:
1. Paul
2. Gingrich
3. Romney
4. Bachmann
5. Cain
6. Pawlenty
7. Huntsman
8. Santorum
Mitt Romney: did fine. I like his state's rights answer on healthcare. For his campaign: B+. He doesn't hurt himself, and maintains his lead. Me personally: B-
Santorum: Seemed like Pawlenty SNL impersonator. Got more passionate as it went on, and wasn't afraid to stand alone. Bad on policy except abortion. Campaign: C. Me: F+
Jon Huntsman: first chance to introduce himself to many, and he didn't do very well. Gets a few points for sticking with some of his unpopular positions. Campaign: D. Me: D
Pawlenty: fun to watch, but reeked of desperation going after Bachmann. Campaign:C-. Me: D+
Bachmann: Did pretty well, but not as good as last time. Nice rhetoric mostly. Gracious in submission question. Campaign: B. Me: C
Gingrich: did well, seemed professorial. May have helped his dying campaign. Campaign: A-. Me: B
Paul: better than before, still somewhat ramble prone. Schooled Santorum on foreign policy and history, but I doubt he expanded his appeal a whole lot. Campaign: C. Me:A
Cain: lacks substance, and experience. Had a couple good lines. Campaign: C-. Me: C-
So overall rankings:
How much they helped their campaign:
1. Gingrich
2. Romney
3. Bachmann
4. Paul
5. Santorum
6. Cain
7. Pawlenty
8. Huntsman
How well they appealed to me:
1. Paul
2. Gingrich
3. Romney
4. Bachmann
5. Cain
6. Pawlenty
7. Huntsman
8. Santorum