Calling all ron paul supporters! I need your help!!!

[Scott Bain]

Below is a link to my website; on it I have included a list of every comment that hit the chat-room FOX had set up for commenting during the Iowa 'debate'. Dr. Paul was mentioned a total of 675 times by viewers during the debate. I would like to get a total for each of the other candidates as well so that we can throw a percentage at the mainstream media showing them that Dr. Paul isn't just for real, he's THE dominant force in this race. ALL other 'competitors' are diminutive in his presence, and it's time to start slamming that home like a sledge hammer. Please visit the link and help out if you can, and don't forget to pass this on. Thanks in advance!

http://speakup-usa.com/?p=1268

[kah13176]

Pawlenty: 59 Matches

Santorum: 62 Matches

Huntsman: 38 Matches

Perry: 44 Matches

Bachmann: 90 Matches

Gingrich: 24 Matches


I'm not sure if these are 100% accurate, and the auto-text finder built into internet explorer won't count over 100 matches, as is the case with Paul, Herman Cain, and Romney.

[Scott Bain]

I actually counted all 675 with my own eyeballs. [which are now needing some serious rest] Thanks for your help!

[d1sCo]

Here you go, these numbers should be fairly accurate.


Ron Paul - 547

Paul - 107

Herman Cain - 43

Cain - 116

Mitt Romney - 17

Romney - 112

Michele Bachmann - 2

Bachmann- 78

Tim Pawlenty - 1

Pawlenty - 58

Rick Santorum - 4

Santorum - 55

Jon Huntsman - 1

Huntsman - 35

Newt Gingrich - 6

Gingrich - 17

If your chat logs are correct then Ron Paul had the largest prescience in the chat room by a staggering amount.

-d1sCo

[lucky_bg]

+ rep

[Eric21ND]

So what does this mean?

[John of Des Moines]

So what does this mean?

It means the people in the Fox chat room were talking a lot about Ron Paul.

[FSP-Rebel]

It means the people in the Fox chat room were talking a lot about Ron Paul.

Yeah, they were probably like wake me up when he gets another question.

[trey4sports]

So what does this mean?

Nothing, really.

[UtahApocalypse]

So what does this mean?

means we spend to much time online and not enough going door to door, a events, and tabling.

[LibertyEagle]

means we spend to much time online and not enough going door to door, a events, and tabling.

bingo

[Jandrsn21]

Yeah, they were probably like wake me up when he gets another question.

LOL! I know I was! Hearing, blah blah blah...... free markets..... blah blah blah........ obama sucks........ send more soldiers to die......blah blah blah all night long! Only reason I watch any of this stuff is for Ron.

[Scott Bain]

means we spend to much time online and not enough going door to door, a events, and tabling.

I don't think that going door to door in the middle of the night asking about politics is a good idea.
(sorry, I just had to say it!) ;D

And any of you that would like are welcome to attend our social gathering in Metairie tomorrow at The Rock N Roll Cafe. The event starts at 5pm and we will be showing a live webcast of the straw poll.

The event page can be found here http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=148928851853419

Rob Waldron will be hosting the Louisiana for Liberty Meeting on the following evening starting at 6pm. The meeting will be held at The Abita Springs Cafe, located at 22132 Level Street Abita Springs, LA 70420

Both are sure to be a great time.

See you there!

[Scott Bain]

Here you go, these numbers should be fairly accurate.


Ron Paul - 547

Paul - 107

Herman Cain - 43

Cain - 116

Mitt Romney - 17

Romney - 112

Michele Bachmann - 2

Bachmann- 78

Tim Pawlenty - 1

Pawlenty - 58

Rick Santorum - 4

Santorum - 55

Jon Huntsman - 1

Huntsman - 35

Newt Gingrich - 6

Gingrich - 17

If your chat logs are correct then Ron Paul had the largest prescience in the chat room by a staggering amount.

-d1sCo

Even if my total was off, it still shows my prediction of Dr. Paul being mentioned more than any of the other three candidates combined to be correct. I will recount later. Going over 1000 or so messages in 24 hours is something that I am NOT willing to do. [yet] ;)