PDA

View Full Version : Paul passes Bachmann on Intrade Ames poll....for now




Agorism
08-11-2011, 11:37 PM
Michele Bachmann to win 2011 Ames Straw Poll
Event: Winner of 2011 Ames Straw Poll (Aug 13th)
45.0%
CHANCE
Predict

Ron Paul to win 2011 Ames Straw Poll
Event: Winner of 2011 Ames Straw Poll (Aug 13th)
50.0%
CHANCE
Predict

Tim Pawlenty to win 2011 Ames Straw Poll
Event: Winner of 2011 Ames Straw Poll (Aug 13th)
10.0%
CHANCE
Predict

Any other individual to win 2011 Ames Straw Poll
Event: Winner of 2011 Ames Straw Poll (Aug 13th)
3.0%
CHANCE


http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/

d1sCo
08-11-2011, 11:46 PM
*amazing* news! I hope it stays that way!

libertybrewcity
08-11-2011, 11:49 PM
awesome!

R3volutionJedi
08-11-2011, 11:50 PM
This straw poll will be a close race between Bachmann & Ron Paul.

anaconda
08-11-2011, 11:53 PM
I wonder if this was because of the debate, or if these numbers are from before it occurred?

sailingaway
08-11-2011, 11:59 PM
I'm concerned about one particular comment made which I've already seen media on, but I'll see how it goes.

Agorism
08-12-2011, 12:00 AM
I wonder if this was because of the debate, or if these numbers are from before it occurred?

After

Restore-America-NOW
08-12-2011, 12:01 AM
I'm concerned about one particular comment made which I've already seen media on, but I'll see how it goes.

What? Paul's admission that he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman?

pauliticalfan
08-12-2011, 12:02 AM
Well this is good news after a tough debate.

sailingaway
08-12-2011, 12:04 AM
What? Paul's admission that he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman?

look for the Newsmax 'smear piece' thread. That one.

JJonesMBA
08-12-2011, 12:12 AM
...

KingRobbStark
08-12-2011, 12:17 AM
hxxp://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/ron-paul-iran-bomb/2011/08/11/id/407043

This one?

Apart from the title, the article seems mostly accurate and positive for Dr. Paul, although it misses Dr. Paul's rebuttal to Santorum that we've been involved in Iran's internal affairs since 1953.

I read that article too. Didn't seem to impressed.