PDA

View Full Version : Is the debt limit Committee’s authority un-constitutional? Yes, or no?




johnwk
08-04-2011, 12:46 PM
A couple of days ago Judge Napolitano was on FoxNews and he indicated the committee of 12 established under the debt limit Act was unconstitutional Although he is correct, I found myself very upset that the Judge failed to mention those parts of the Constitution which would be violated. They are Article 1, Section 5 and Article 4, Section 4.

Under Article 1, Section 5 it is required that a “Majority” of members of both houses must be present “to do Business“. This provision was specifically debated during the framing of our Constitution and it was intended by our founding fathers to forbid “a small number of members of the two Houses to “make law”. SEE for example: MADISON’S NOTES, AUGUST 10TH (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_810.asp)

Col. MASON

“This is a valuable & necessary part of the plan. In this extended Country, embracing so great a diversity of interests, it would be dangerous to the distant parts to allow a small number of members of the two Houses to make laws. The Central States could always take care to be on the Spot and by meeting earlier than the distant ones, or wearying their patience, and outstaying them, could carry such measures as they pleased. He admitted that inconveniences might spring from the secession of a small number: But he had also known good produced by an apprehension, of it. He had known a paper emission prevented by that cause in Virginia. He thought the Constitution as now moulded was founded on sound principles, and was disposed to put into it extensive powers. At the same time he wished to guard agst. abuses as much as possible. If the Legislature should be able to reduce the number at all, it might reduce it as low as it pleased & the U. States might be governed by a Juncto- A majority of the number which had been agreed on, was so few that he feared it would be made an objection agst. the plan.”



Under the 12 member committee the largest possible number of States that would be represented in the making of law would be a mere12 States. And, of the hundreds of Congressional Districts across America, 12 is the highest number that would be represented in the making of law. This 12 member committee which is designed to “make law” is exactly what the founders intended to prevent by requiring at a minimum a “Majority” of the members of both houses “shall constitute a Quorum to do Business”

Quorum is a legal term and is the number of the officers or members of any body as is competent by law or constitution to transact business. The Constitution by its very wording requires at a minimum 50 Senators and 218 Representatives to do business. Col. MASON‘S above quote tells us that the committee of 12 would be dangerous to “make law”, and keep in mind making law is significantly different from voting to approve a law which has already been “made“.

As to Article 4, Section 4, we are guaranteed a “Republican Form of Government” and the very essences of a Republican Form of Government is that the people’s representatives are to be directly involved in the law making process. So, are the unique interests of the various united States represented in the law making process in this committee? No! Are the people’s interests of each of the hundreds of State Congressional Districts represented in the law making process of under this committee? No!

Do we understand the important difference between the making of law and voting upon a law which is already made?

This act is a direct assault upon the very essence of our “Republican Form of Government” as our founders intended it to operate, and if allowed to take effect, it would be a devastating and fundamental transformation of our system of government in that is excludes both the people’s interests and the various State unique interests in the sausage making process and only allows them an up or down vote on a law made in secret and behind closed doors, just as occurred with Obamacare!

As I have said elsewhere, every member in the Senate who voted YEA to establish this “committee“, is complicit in a subversive act of tyranny designed to fundamentally transform and dissolved our guarantee to a Republican Form of Government!

But tell me, why are our “conservative” talk show hosts [Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Schnitt, Mark Levin, Dennis Prager, Bill O'rielly, Mike Gallagher, Doc Thompson, Lee Rodgers, Neal Boortz, Mike Huckabee, Tammy Bruce, Monica Crowley, Herman Cain …. etc.] ignoring this attack upon our “Republican Form of Government”? Is there no outraged among them that Article 1, Section 5 will be subverted by the 12 member committee making law?

JWK

America we have a problem! We have a group of DOMESTIC ENEMIES (http://republicmainstreet.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/members-of-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-is-your-representative-a-member/) who have managed to seize political power and whose mission is in fact to bring “change” to America ___ the dismantling of our military defensive power; the allowance of our borders to be overrun by foreign invaders, the diluting of our election process by allowing ineligible persons to vote; the circumvention of our Republican Form of Government which is now replace with a 12 member committee vested with power to make law; the destruction of our manufacturing capabilities; the transferring of America’s technology to hostile foreign nations; the strangulation of our agricultural industry and ability to produce food under the guise of environmental necessity; the destruction of our nation’s health care delivery system, the interference with our ability to develop our natural resources, namely oil, to fuel our economy; the looting of both our federal treasury and a mandatory retirement pension fund; the brainwashing of our nation’s children in government operated schools; the trashing of our nation’s traditions and moral values; the creation of an iron fisted control unauthorized by our written Constitution over America’s businesses and industries; the devaluation of our nation’s currency, and, the future enslavement of our children and grand children via unbridled debt and inflation, not to mention an iron fisted government which intends to rule their very lives!

demolama
08-04-2011, 01:23 PM
Plain and simple...Ignorance. Today no body wants to learn about dead white men who founded this country because they allowed slavery to exist. So rather than look to their advice and wisdom they ignored them because they allowed slavery to continue. It is also the idea that we as the future generations are more enlightened than those who came before us and therefore know better than they did. Again it's all about ignorance and arrogance.

Lucille
08-04-2011, 01:37 PM
Ed at HotAir calls RP and The Judge's objections "nonsense on stilts."

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/04/super-congress-super-committee-super-hyperbole/

I hate those neoclowns hacks with the white hot intensity of 1000 burning suns.

mnewcomb
08-04-2011, 01:41 PM
I'm not convinced of the illegality argument.

Constitution, Article 1, Section 5.

"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings..."

Don't they regularly set up the rules for voting on bills? Like 5m each to debate?

johnwk
08-04-2011, 06:42 PM
I'm not convinced of the illegality argument.

Constitution, Article 1, Section 5.

"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings..."

Don't they regularly set up the rules for voting on bills? Like 5m each to debate?

Please note that Congress is not authorized to ignore specific provisions our Constitution in making its “rules” under Article 1, Section 5. As a matter of fact the Section specifically commands that a Quorum must be present in either house to do business. And, a Quorum is defined in our Constitution as being a majority of the members of either house.

Now, keep in mind that according to Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. A Committee does not have authority to legislate a bill into existence. A bill must be legislated into existence by Congress, and when a bill is legislated into existence it takes a majority of the house members in which it is created to be present to conduct such business! This means that 51 Senators must be present in the one instance and 218 Representatives must be present if the bill is created in the House. And after a bill is so created, it may then be voted up or down.

The proposal seeks to reduce the number of Representatives and Senators in the creation of a bill to a mere 12 members of Congress, hand selected by the inside crowd on Capitol Hill, and this is an intentional assault upon Article 1, Section 5 and our Constitution‘s guaranteed to a “Republican Form of Government“

It’s really not very complicated. This is how Obamacare came into existence!


JWK

johnwk
08-05-2011, 06:27 AM
Article I, Section 1.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.


Why are the various States, their Governors and Legislatures not up in arms against this 12 member committee tyranny? Seems to me only 12 States can be represented in the making of this legislation. Likewise, why are the people of the hundreds of Congressional Districts across America not up in arms as only 12 Congressional Districts can be represented in the making of the legislation.


Have the States and People lost their liking for a Republican Form of Government and are willing to surrender their constitutional right to be represented in the making of legislation which affects their lives, their liberty and property?


JWK


Our tyrants in Washington force the productive to pay income taxes so they can spread their wealth and buy votes, but the Washington Establishment does not force their beloved 45 % who pay no income taxes to work for the taxes they get.

Zippyjuan
08-05-2011, 11:39 AM
Are committees illegal? Nearly every bill ever passed was written by a committee and are then, subject to aproval, released to the entire House or Senate to vote on and if they both pass it, it goes to the President to sign or veto. The committee cannot create any legislation without further aproval. Ron Paul sits on committees which have created legislation.

johnwk
08-06-2011, 09:40 AM
At another site I visit the 12 member committee was dubbed as the “Dirty Dozen”. I will henceforth be using that to describe this subversive creation, and so should every concerned American who wishes to help restore our constitutionally limited Republican Form of Government.

And just what is the job of the “Dirty Dozen Committee”? It is part of a subversive plan by members of Congress to write and propose legislation to be voted upon, without the proposal being first recognized as a “bill”, and to circumvent the required procedure by which a bill is to originate in the House! Let us look at the facts.


Keep in mind that whatever comes out of the “Dirty Dozen Committee” is not a “bill” within the meaning of our Constitution and cannot be treated as such, and especially not voted up or down and become law as is now proposed by members of Congress who voted to create the “Dirty Dozen Committee”.

All bills for raising revenue must originate in the House and how a bill originates in the house requires a “Quorum” to be present to do business. In fact the Chair is not to be taken till a Quorum for business is present [218 members of the House]. But let us look at how a bill originates in the House as stated in Jefferson’s Manual.

When the House is set to do business, proposed bills, and this would include whatever the “Dirty Dozen Committee” has cooked up, may be presented, the Clerk reads it at the table, and hands it to the Speaker, who, rising, states to the House the title of the bill; that it is the first time of reading it; and the question will be, whether it shall be read a second time? then sitting down to give an opening for objections.

It is at this point in procedure, prior to a bill being recognized in Congress as a bill, and prior to it being committed and engrossed, all of which is necessary for a bill to have originated in the House, that our Washington Establishment wishes to fundamentally transform in such a manner as to allow a proposed bill, cooked up by the “Dirty Dozen Committee”, to be recognized as a bill without it originating in the House which requires the above stated procedure. The fundamental transformation is to eliminate the people’s elected Representatives constitutionally mandated requirement in originating a bill, during which time objections may be made to what the “Dirty Dozen Committee” has cooked up, and have an up or down vote on proposed legislation which has never been made a bill.


Now, why are our “conservative” talk show hosts [Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Schnitt, Mark Levin, Dennis Prager, Bill O'rielly, Mike Gallagher, Doc Thompson, Lee Rodgers, Neal Boortz, Mike Huckabee, Tammy Bruce, Monica Crowley, Herman Cain …. etc.] not outraged over this tyrannical attempt to ignore the process by which a proposed bill may originate in the House?


JWK

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation___ Declaration of Independence

Brian4Liberty
08-06-2011, 10:45 AM
My take, off the top of my head on the day it was proposed:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?304758-Well-they-just-handed-us-one-hell-of-a-message-...&p=3417413&viewfull=1#post3417413




There are two separate bodies in Congress. Official mergers of the two may not be Constitutional. Isn't the House of Representatives supposed to create the Bills, and then the Senate is the smaller, elite Body that also deliberates and votes on them?

Other issues with this:

- It is an attack on junior members of Congress like Rand Paul and Mike Lee, and the Tea Party in general. They want to take away their input and ability to do anything.

- If a smaller group coming up with a plan is such a good idea, then why was the bipartisan "National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform" (Debt Commission) ignored by everyone, especially by Obama who initiated it in the first place?

- Is it Constitutional (or correct) to write the Democrat/Republican duopoly into law? Are the Democrats and Republicans established somewhere in the Constitution as the official Parties?

- States Rights: Which States will lose representation by not having any members on this Super-Congress?

RideTheDirt
08-06-2011, 12:51 PM
Yes, it is unconstitutional

johnwk
08-06-2011, 03:39 PM
Yes, it is unconstitutional

Then I strongly urge concerned Americans to immediately focus their attention on this subversive Dirty Dozen Committee and Congress' attack upon our system of government before it becomes standard procedure, and ends the people’s Representatives from being able to object to particular provisions in the “making of law” prior to it becoming law by an up or down vote.

Regards,

JWK


Our federal government personifies a living creature, a predator: it grows, it multiplies, it protects itself, it feeds on those it can defeat, and does everything to expand its powers and flourish, even at the expense of enslaving a nation’s entire population.

Teaser Rate
08-06-2011, 05:07 PM
Are committees illegal? Nearly every bill ever passed was written by a committee and are then, subject to aproval, released to the entire House or Senate to vote on and if they both pass it, it goes to the President to sign or veto. The committee cannot create any legislation without further aproval. Ron Paul sits on committees which have created legislation.

This.


According to some around here, the Federal Government's very existence is unconstitutional.

johnwk
08-07-2011, 06:31 PM
Our Washington Establishment takes the meaning of tyranny to a new height with its proposed Dirty Dozen Committee. While the Washington Establishment allows 45 percent of our nation’s population to be free from paying income taxes in return for their vote, the Establishment now proposes to exclude the vast majority of existing Taxpayers’ their representation on the Dirty Dozen Committee who will be making law affecting the American Tax Payer’s lives, liberty and diminishing property they own.


How much more abuse will the American Tax Payers allow themselves to be subjected to before they rise up and forcefully deal with the scum sucking parasites in Washington who have caused our nation’s economic misery, but live large with their blown dried hair, fancy suits, top of the shelf taxpayer finance health care, not to mention their naughty nightlife ventures in Georgetown?


Do these parasites, and especially Boehner and Reid, think Tea Party Activists are unaware of the reason behind their Dirty Dozen Committee? Which is obviously to exclude Tea Party members in Congress their voice and vote in making law to cut government spending.


Bottom line is, the Dirty Dozen Committee is an unmitigated despotic assault upon our founding fathers battle cry…no taxation without representation, to which ought to be added … no representation without taxation!


And as to Obama and his blathering over “fair share” and all must have skin in the game, our wise founding fathers put a fair share formula in our Constitution:



States’ population

---------------------------- X SUM TO BE RAISED = STATE’S SHARE

Total U.S. Population




I say it’s not only time to drain the swamp in Washington, but to punish those now in Washington who have caused our nation’s economic miseries with laws not in harmony with our Constitution, and who now wish to exclude the American Taxpayer’s representation on the Dirty Dozen Committee, silencing their voice in how to cut government spending.



JWK



Health care by consent of the governed (Article 5) our amendment process --- tyranny by a PROGRESSIVE (http://republicmainstreet.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/members-of-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-is-your-representative-a-member/) majority vote in Congress!

Pro-Life Libertarian
08-07-2011, 06:35 PM
Bad idea? Yes

Illegal? No

johnwk
08-07-2011, 07:30 PM
Bad idea? Yes

Illegal? No

I do not share you opinion about it not being illegal.



Our Constitution commands by its very language that All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. I see no mention of “committees” in that wording. And, the Constitution goes on to define the precise membership which constitutes either House. At this time there are 435 members if the House and 100 members in the Senate, and it is they who have been granted the sole authority over all legislative powers.


Our Constitution goes on to make an allowance for a smaller number of members of Congress “to do business“ under Article 1, Section 5, but the provision is crystal clear on the minimum number of House and Senate members which must be present for either house to do business. The minimum number set by the Constitution for either House to do business is a majority of its members which constitutes a “Quorum”. That would be 51 Senators for the Senate to do business and 218 Representatives for the House to do business.

Also under Article 1, Section V each House may determine the Rules of its “Proceedings“, but this is not a grant of authority to ignore the above mentioned constitutional provisions which vests all legislative power in a Congress of the united States, defines Congress as being two Houses, a House of Representatives and a Senate, and further defines the membership of each house and specifically requires a minimum of either House membership must be present “to do business“.

The Dirty Dozen Committee idea cooked up by the Washington Establishment’s inside crowd is a clever attempt to concentrate their power and dominate the law making authority by denying representation in the committee to all but six States, and deny the input in the making of law to all Congressional Districts but six, when the making of law by the proposed Dirty Dozen Committee will affect the lives, liberties and property of the people in each of the united States and in each Congressional District in the united States. This my friends is the very definition of tyranny!


JWK