View Full Version : Looks like Bildeberger Slick Rick Perry is inching closer to running
sofia
07-20-2011, 12:51 PM
It will be Bildeberger vs Bildeberger
http://www.khou.com/news/texas-news/Anita-Perry-encourages-husband-to-run-for-president-125893574.html
fisharmor
07-20-2011, 12:53 PM
I'll make a million dollar bet that the YouTube or Twitter audiences won't be permitted to ask stuff like "Gov. Perry, if you become president, will you illegally force my daughter to take totally unnecessary vaccinations manufactured by your campaign donors?"
Napoleon's Shadow
07-20-2011, 12:57 PM
FoxNews says that Rick Perry has a Tea Party problem:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/19/no-tea-party-for-perry-as-weighs-nomination-bid/
stu2002
07-20-2011, 12:58 PM
Texas Gov. Perry Bilderberg’s Ace in the Hole?
By James P. Tucker Jr.
Is Texas Gov. Rick Perry the Bilderberg group’s Republican candidate-in-waiting in the 2012 presidential race? The shadowy globalist group is scheduled to meet secretly behind locked doors over the weekend of June 9-12 in St. Moritz, Switzerland, and AFP will be on location to cover it.
It is not without precedent to tap state governors for broader vistas. Bill Clinton at one time was the obscure governor of Arkansas—a land with strong Rockefeller influence since the days of Gov. Winthrop Rockefeller. As governor, Clinton attended his first Bilderberg meeting in 1991 and was elected president about a year later.
Like Clinton, Perry has attended a Bilderberg meeting. In June 2007 Perry attended the Bilderberg confab in Istanbul, Turkey, making the mandatory promise of secrecy and to follow orders. At the time, Perry was chastised in the newly aroused independent press.
Speculation that Perry is the Bilderberg group’s ace card was prompted by the current political climate, which can largely be gleaned from the fact that Perry is a longtime, unwavering supporter of the NAFTA Superhighway and related infrastructure projects. These pave the way for the Bilderberg-supported North American Union (NAU) proposal that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
The word is that Bilderberg is concerned about the boring field of Republican presidential candidates. One of the current GOP candidates, former Georgia Rep. Newt Gingrich, once told AFP, eyeball to eyeball, that he never had participated and never would participate in Bilderberg or Trilateral Commission meetings, although Gingrich is still a fervent globalist, nonetheless.
President Obama, as AFP has reported, is a tool of Bilderberg. He had been sought out at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly, Va., just before winning the 2008 Democratic nomination. While receiving his instructions from Bilderberg, the dutiful Obama appeared to be bobbing for apples.
But just owning the Democratic nominee won’t do, as Bilderberg likes to own both horses in a two horse race for the White House.
Bilderberg’s GOP favorite, such as he is, is starchy Mitt Romney, but the former Massachusetts governor keeps tripping over his mouth trying to explain his health reform positions. As governor, he imposed the kind of topdown mandatory healthcare reform that Bilderberg likes. As a presidential candidate, Romney is suddenly trying to explain how he opposes it. So, he is unlikely to be nominated. The rest of the field is also weak, but any nominee could be elected if the country remains in recession—something Bilderberg has engineered.
So enter Perry to “save the day” for internationalism.
banner_newsletter
In 2007, when confronted by the local press on his return from Turkey, Perry insisted that the Bilderberg boys do good work and Americans should be grateful.
But Perry appeared confused when asked about the Logan Act, which outlaws meetings of government officials with private citizens to make public policy unless they are held in public, not behind locked and guarded doors as is the case at the annual Bilderberg meetings.
Foes of the Logan Act argue that it passed in 1789, so it’s “out of date.” To this, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) responds that unless it’s repealed, it remains the law. And it has been amended and strengthened over the years, including in the 20th century.
Paul has called for a criminal investigation into Perry’s Bilderberg trip. “This information about him going over there and violating the Logan Act and getting involved . . . I’m just impressed that that’s in the ordinary media—I think that’s encouraging, too,” he said on a talk radio show, adding that Perry’s attendance was “a sign that he’s involved in the international conspiracy.”
Perry has repeatedly denied that he is running for president, but several campaigns have been put forth to draft the three term Texas governor. In addition, Perry keeps pushing himself as a Bilderberg wild card. At Republican events, he has described the type of nominee the GOP needs (like himself) without naming himself.
The Bilderberg backed NAU that he supports would erase the boundaries between Mexico, the United States and Canada. The plan is to expand the “union” throughout the Western Hemisphere, resulting in an “American Union,” similar to the European Union that is draining Europe dry of its former prosperity, with Switzerland— the location of the 2011 Bilderberg meeting—faring better because it’s neither an EU nor a NATO member.
His support of the Trans Texas Corridor within the state’s boundaries has been unflinching, since that is Texas’s part of the greater NAFTA Superhighway network to connect the NAU nations physically.
Bilderberg, true to form, wants the U.S. recession to continue throughout 2012 and for oil prices to remain high and increase further. This could make Obama a one-term president. But at this point it appears Bilderberg’s “other horse” is headed for the stable, to be groomed as their ace in the hole.
AFP editor James P. Tucker Jr. is a veteran journalist who spent many years as a member of the “elite” media in Washington. Since 1975 he has won widespread recognition, here and abroad, for his pursuit of on-the-scene stories reporting the intrigues of global power blocs such as the Bilderberg Group. Tucker is the author of Jim Tucker’s Bilderberg Diary: One Man’s 25-Year Battle to Shine the Light on the World Shadow Government. Bound in an attractive full-color softcover and containing 272 pages—loaded with photos, many never published before—the book recounts Tucker’s experiences over the last quarter century at Bilderberg meetings. $25 from AFP. No charge for S&H in U.S.
Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.
Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .
Sign up for our free e-newsletter here - get a free gift just for signing up!
(Issue # 23, June 6, 2011)
Send this page to a friend! (click here)
Please make a donation to American Free Press
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
bobbyw24
07-20-2011, 01:05 PM
I like that they incorporated Ron Paul, but did the good doctor really say this?
Foes of the Logan Act argue that it passed in 1789, so it’s “out of date.” To this, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) responds that unless it’s repealed, it remains the law. And it has been amended and strengthened over the years, including in the 20th century.
Paul has called for a criminal investigation into Perry’s Bilderberg trip. “This information about him going over there and violating the Logan Act and getting involved . . . I’m just impressed that that’s in the ordinary media—I think that’s encouraging, too,” he said on a talk radio show, adding that Perry’s attendance was “a sign that he’s involved in the international conspiracy.”
bobbyw24
07-20-2011, 08:07 PM
I like that they incorporated Ron Paul, but did the good doctor really say this?
Foes of the Logan Act argue that it passed in 1789, so it’s “out of date.” To this, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) responds that unless it’s repealed, it remains the law. And it has been amended and strengthened over the years, including in the 20th century.
Paul has called for a criminal investigation into Perry’s Bilderberg trip. “This information about him going over there and violating the Logan Act and getting involved . . . I’m just impressed that that’s in the ordinary media—I think that’s encouraging, too,” he said on a talk radio show, adding that Perry’s attendance was “a sign that he’s involved in the international conspiracy.”
Anyone?
Brad Zink
07-20-2011, 08:38 PM
Article published June 1, 2007:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/010607internationalconspiracy.htm
Romulus
07-20-2011, 08:39 PM
RP is ready for Rick 'gov gardisil' Perry..!
RonPaulGetsIt
07-20-2011, 08:48 PM
besides the gardasil he tried to ram thru the NAFTA superhighway...trans texas corridor they called it.
total power elite puppet. He does what they tell him to.
Brett85
07-20-2011, 08:49 PM
The media have already annointed Rick Perry as the new frontrunner in the race, and he hasn't even announced yet. Bill O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg also announced that Marco Rubio will indeed be the Vice Presidential nominee for the Republicans. It's amazing that these media people are able to see into the future.
Anti Federalist
07-20-2011, 09:23 PM
Anyone?
Ron Paul: Perry's Bilderberg Attendance Proof Governor Part Of "International Conspiracy"
Agrees that Perry should be investigated for potentially violating the Logan Act
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, June 1, 2007
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/010607internationalconspiracy.htm
Texas Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul has added his voice to those who believe Texas Governor Rick Perry should be investigated for a criminal violation of the Logan Act after he jetted off to meet with foreign elites yesterday at the Bilderberg Group conference in Istanbul.
Perry's trip to Turkey is a clear violation of the Logan Act which states that "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."
Since Perry has not received authorization from Congress, the U.S. government or the American people to meet with Bilderberg luminaries, where policy that impacts the world is secretly discussed in a wholly undemocratic fashion, his visit represents a criminal act.
Speaking on the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul agreed that Perry should be investigated for a potential violation of the Logan Act.
"This information about him going over there and violating the Logan Act and getting involved - I'm just impressed that that's in the ordinary media - I think that's encouraging too," said the Congressman.
Paul said that Perry's attendance was "A sign that he's involved in the international conspiracy."
Perry's press secretary declined to give a statement when we called and denied any knowledge of the Logan Act, yet seemed to be fully aware of it in claiming Bilderberg was a private meeting. Since the Logan Act also bars private citizens from negotiating with foreign officials, Perry is still violating the law.
Archives of the 31 May 2007 show (I do not know what hour of the show he was on):
http://archives2007.gcnlive.com/Archives2007/May2007/ajam2adf4/0531071.mp3
http://archives2007.gcnlive.com/Archives2007/May2007/ajam2adf4/0531072.mp3
http://archives2007.gcnlive.com/Archives2007/May2007/ajam2adf4/0531073.mp3
parocks
07-20-2011, 10:28 PM
Bilderberg’s GOP favorite, such as he is, is starchy Mitt Romney, but the former Massachusetts governor keeps tripping over his mouth trying to explain his health reform positions. As governor, he imposed the kind of topdown mandatory healthcare reform that Bilderberg likes. As a presidential candidate, Romney is suddenly trying to explain how he opposes it. So, he is unlikely to be nominated. The rest of the field is also weak, but any nominee could be elected if the country remains in recession—something Bilderberg has engineered.
I don't know why the author necessarily assumes that Romney is a Bilderberg favorite. Yes, Romneycare. But compared to attending the Bilderberg meeting, Gardasil, and Trans-Texas Corridor, I'd say that what we're seeing is Bilderberg is hyping, in Perry, their candidate.
Perry is not an ordinary RINO.
parocks
07-20-2011, 10:32 PM
I say we throw out "rules about how to treat other candidates" when we're dealing with Perry.
Every candidate is a candidate who we must beat in order to win.
But they're not all involved in the international conspiracy.
Whether RP wins or loses, we'd prefer that our Nominee not be involved in the international conspiracy.
parocks
07-20-2011, 10:33 PM
I don't trust Rubio either, but I haven't done much research.
Nastynate
07-21-2011, 01:07 AM
I don't trust Rubio either, but I haven't done much research.
Rubio is a snake in the grass, he hasn't been exposed yet because he hasn't been in the Senate that long but he'll show his true colors. He already has a few times with the Patriot act as an example. Also the king like status he seems to have obtained on Fox news. I didn't know much about him coming into the 2010 election so I tuned into his winning speech in Florida when he won the nomination and Jeb Bush introduced him which threw up all sorts of flags in my book.
A Texas showdown is what we have here, folks! *spits*
headhawg7
07-21-2011, 01:56 AM
The media have already annointed Rick Perry as the new frontrunner in the race, and he hasn't even announced yet. Bill O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg also announced that Marco Rubio will indeed be the Vice Presidential nominee for the Republicans. It's amazing that these media people are able to see into the future.
You are right....it's simply amazing. Unless Paul is elected nothing will change. If voters were to only watch campaign ads and debates and NOTHING else they would see Paul is the clear cut choice. He would embarrass Obama and Perry in a debate. The problem is the news outlets will continue to bash Paul and label him an extremist and a kook. Obama will benefit from having the MSM, 95% of print, MSNBC and NPR on his side. Perry will benefit from Fox and 95% of talk radio. Paul will benefit from napolitano on FBN and website such as this one.
Paul is the only republican that has ANY chance to get some democrats to switch sides in the election because of his views on social issues. He will also get a large majority of independents. The independents will break from Obama unless Perry wins the nomination. Perry will have ZERO chance at getting any current democrats to switch sides. If the republican party as a whole were serious about winning they would nominate Paul. They won't and I believe Obama will win again in 2012 if Perry is the republican nominee.
wgadget
07-21-2011, 07:11 AM
It will be Bildeberger vs Bildeberger
http://www.khou.com/news/texas-news/Anita-Perry-encourages-husband-to-run-for-president-125893574.html
And how does this differ from the norm?
Lucille
07-21-2011, 10:04 AM
The neoclowns are desperate and clueless. There is no way Perry would win, considering he is surrounding himself with GWB's Wilsonian warmongers. The people are sick of endless wars.
hxxp://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2011/07/21/rumsfeld-secretly-plotting-texas-takeover/
Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld helped organize Rick Perry’s foreign policy and national security briefing in Austin last Wednesday, Rumsfeld’s staff confirmed today.
Perry’s aides have been tight-lipped about the gathering, which National Review reported included former Rumsfeld aides Doug Feith, Daniel Fata, and William Luti, as well as the magazine’s Andrew McCarthy and others . But I’m told Rumsfeld helped steer Perry’s staff to the low-key advisory group, and his detainee adviser Cully Stimson was also invited, but couldn’t attend.
sofia
07-21-2011, 12:19 PM
I don't trust Rubio either, but I haven't done much research.
Rubio attended the Aspen Institute Fellowship program with Trey Grayson...Jack Conway...and Paul Ryan
Aspen is a Soros / Rockefeller funded commie think tank that promotes "bi=partisanship"
Brian4Liberty
07-21-2011, 12:46 PM
It will be Bildeberger vs Bildeberger
And how does this differ from the norm?
Lol! You took the words out of my mouth. Nothing out of the norm here.
Lucille
07-21-2011, 01:05 PM
I don't trust Rubio either, but I haven't done much research.
Vox Day hits the nail on the head (http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/06/are-neocons-are-losing-red-faction.html):
One unmentioned factor here is that Rand Paul is an native American. Marco Rubio is not. He may have grown up in the United States, but he is a Cuban raised in a community that has been agitating for the USA to overthrow the Castro regime for decades. So, it should come as little surprise that Rubio is so content to ignore the American national interest in favor of the latest neocon cause du jour. Because neocons, regardless of their background, have limited allegiance to the national interest, they see the nation primarily as a means rather than an end.
As I have pointed out in the past, it was always mistaken to conflate neoconservatism with Jews and the Israel First lobby. They are merely the most obvious example of what would be more accurately be described as Neoconnery, (there is nothing conservative about it), and is a concept that is as old as the Roman Republic. Back then, when Rome ruled over the Mediterranean just as America rules over the Atlantic and Pacific, foreign nobles would come to Rome and offer promises of allegiance, troops, and gold in return for a Rome-supported crown. These Friends of Rome were the neocons of their day.
On the one hand, it is encouraging that even the moderate conservatives are beginning to respond to the geostrategic and financial realism of the Red Faction's libertarians. On the other, it is depressing that even bankruptcy isn't enough to slow down those like Rubio, who talks a good game but appears to see America as little more than a tool to serve foreign interests.
And again on Perry:
Rick Perry is the 3rd Bush (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=323053)
The problem is that Perry is a faux conservative who is very much cut from the same globalist cloth as George W. Bush. He isn't a Republican so much as he is an opportunistic member of the bi-factional ruling party; he was the Texas campaign chairman for Al Gore's presidential campaign in 1988. No wonder the "conservative" media love him; it appears that about three-quarters of them are recent converts from the Democratic Party themselves. One reason the Republican Party and the conservative media never make any rightward progress is that both are heavily influenced by former Democrats and liberals who claim to have seen the light, but are always focused on pragmatic compromises rather than principled stands.
Gov. Perry has been a decent governor. Like another ex-Democratic governor, Ronald Reagan, he is good on taxes and bad on borrowing. However, his track record on parental rights and corporate corruption is an awful one, as can be seen by his 2007 executive order requiring $360 Gardasil vaccinations for all Texas girls over the age of 11. Nor did he lift a finger to stop his own State Department of Family and Protective Services when it ran wild in 2008 and kidnapped 468 children on the basis of a single false accusation made by a crazy woman in Colorado. I am not aware of Perry troubling to discipline any of his criminally wayward employees after the fact, either.
This does not mean Rick Perry cannot defeat Obama. Any Republican who wins the nomination has an excellent chance to win the presidential election in 2012. The problem is that a Perry victory would be a pyrrhic one that could be even more damaging to the nation, and to the Republican Party, than George W. Bush's two victories were. Despite his past success, Perry's gubernatorial record indicates that he is totally unequipped to deal with the challenge of an economy that has been artificially, and temporarily, propped up by a $4.1 trillion (82.9 percent) increase in federal debt over the last 11 quarters.
[...]
Economics always trumps mere politics, and the present economic exigencies are too extreme to risk yet another Republican borrow-and-spender. Gov. Perry is a formidable politician, and it is understandable that he looks attractive to those who are desperate to avoid the continuation of the Barry Soetoro charade. America doesn't need another superficial leader who will tell Americans what they want to hear. They need a doctor who is stalwart enough to prescribe for them the bitter medicine they desperately need to take.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.