sailingaway
07-16-2011, 03:53 PM
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/07/17/us/17TTRAMSEY/17TTRAMSEY-articleInline.jpg
A Texan in Washington Who Hasn’t Gone Native
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/us/17ttramsey.html
just a piece of it:
He’s got a new kind of competition this time around. Mr. Paul spent years sounding like a crackpot or a fringe case, spouting ideas that were outside the boundaries of mainstream Republican thinking. That’s one reason his supporters love him — he’s a fearless iconoclast who sticks with his ideas even when everyone around him is wishing he’d sit down and be quiet. Now, however, many of his ideas have taken root. He’s clearly one of the intellectual uncles of the Tea Party movement, and that bunch clearly has many Republican politicians crying uncle. The problem for Mr. Paul is that many of his ideas have been appropriated by the kinds of mainstream Republicans who used to snort when he talked.
But then at the end it asks 'why him'? Which should be obvious, even from what the article says, but there is no curing stupid.
A Texan in Washington Who Hasn’t Gone Native
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/us/17ttramsey.html
just a piece of it:
He’s got a new kind of competition this time around. Mr. Paul spent years sounding like a crackpot or a fringe case, spouting ideas that were outside the boundaries of mainstream Republican thinking. That’s one reason his supporters love him — he’s a fearless iconoclast who sticks with his ideas even when everyone around him is wishing he’d sit down and be quiet. Now, however, many of his ideas have taken root. He’s clearly one of the intellectual uncles of the Tea Party movement, and that bunch clearly has many Republican politicians crying uncle. The problem for Mr. Paul is that many of his ideas have been appropriated by the kinds of mainstream Republicans who used to snort when he talked.
But then at the end it asks 'why him'? Which should be obvious, even from what the article says, but there is no curing stupid.