PDA

View Full Version : Mitt Romney Donors...SPREAD AROUND!




No Free Beer
07-15-2011, 08:36 PM
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/Q2/C00431171/A_EMPLOYER_C00431171.html

Go figure...

Provided by "Seth" from RPF...

Seth
07-15-2011, 08:37 PM
113k from Morgan Stanley and a bunch from other bankers...

CaseyJones
07-15-2011, 08:42 PM
mua ha ha ha look at all the banksters!

d1sCo
07-15-2011, 08:44 PM
If we can get a list together I will make up a quick flyer people can use to show some of the more embarrassing donors on the list for Romney. That way we can show people what a big phoney he is.

Probably wont mention Ron Paul on the flyer though, as he doesn't like to get mixed up in that kind of thing.

sailingaway
07-15-2011, 08:44 PM
Ron Paul = the thinking man's candidate

Mitt Romney = the Banker's candidate




Probably wont mention Ron Paul on the flyer though, as he doesn't like to get mixed up in that kind of thing.

Good idea.

Telkandore
07-15-2011, 08:45 PM
235k from Gold Man Sacks.

RonPaulRules
07-15-2011, 08:46 PM
Make a video of all the banks that donated to Romney.

Seth
07-15-2011, 08:50 PM
Homemaker $2,120,162.38
retired $1,556,259.24
self-employed $1,536,473.11
information requested per best efforts $1,152,216.00
goldman sach & co. $235,750.00
credit suisse $156,000.00
student $127,730.12
morgan stanley $113,700.00
pricewater house coopers llp $65,750.00
vivint $60,500.00
sullivan & cromwell llp $54,750.00
the villages $45,000.00
no employer was supplied $41,750.00
marriott internatinal inc. $41,087.78
bain & company $38,000.00
unemployed $35,850.00
ropes & gray llp $33,500.00
bain capital $31,000.00
perella weinberg partners $31,000.00
u.b.s. Financial $31,000.00
j.p. Morgan chase $29,750.00
kirkland & ellis llp $27,625.00
h.i.g. Capital $27,500.00
merrill lynch $25,700.00
skullcandy inc. $22,500.00
kohlberg kravis roberts & co. $21,000.00
harbour group $20,000.00
related companies $20,000.00
the blackstone group $20,000.00
barclays capital $19,000.00
affiliated managers group $18,000.00
general atlantic $17,500.00
hig capital $17,500.00
citi $17,250.00
bank of america $16,000.00
deutsche bank $15,250.00

RonPaul101.com
07-15-2011, 08:51 PM
What are the corporate limits? Are there any?

Wow, look at all the banks....

Seth
07-15-2011, 08:52 PM
That's not one person. It's the total of all people who listed that as their occupation.

Strange that he got $2.1 mil from "homemakers". Ron Paul got $0 from "homemakers".

realtonygoodwin
07-15-2011, 08:54 PM
everyone who donated who listed HOMEMAKER is added together and placed under that category. That is not one person donating that much. Same with all the others. Bank of America donated $16,000? More like, all the people who donated to Romney who work at BoA added up to $16,000.

Teaser Rate
07-15-2011, 08:59 PM
Attacking Romney because the employees of certain firms donated to his campaign is no different than the negative press Ron Paul received last election because a few Stormfront members donated to his campaign.

There are many good ways to go after Romney, this isn't one of them.

VoluntaryAmerican
07-15-2011, 09:01 PM
Mitt's Bankster Pals:

MERRILL LYNCH $25,700.00
GOLDMAN SACH & CO. $235,750.00
MORGAN STANLEY $113,700.00
WELLS FARGO approx. $29,000

Seth
07-15-2011, 09:01 PM
Well the hundreds of thousands from bankers is a big difference from the largest amount donated from a single employer to Ron Paul. Here is Paul's:

NONE $455,044.42
SELF $383,421.07
REQUESTED $53,191.84
SELF EMPLOYED $41,419.00
SELF-EMPLOYED $37,084.38
US ARMY $11,057.44
UNEMPLOYED $9,971.65
RETIRED $8,577.20
ENTERGY $6,000.00
GOOGLE $5,372.40
MAXIR CORP $5,000.00
ZIVITY $5,000.00
CMI GOLD & SILVER INC $4,500.00

VoluntaryAmerican
07-15-2011, 09:03 PM
Attacking Romney because the employees of certain firms donated to his campaign is no different than the negative press Ron Paul received last election because a few Stormfront members donated to his campaign.

There are many good ways to go after Romney, this isn't one of them.

MERRILL LYNCH $25,700.00
GOLDMAN SACH & CO. $235,750.00
MORGAN STANLEY $113,700.00
WELLS FARGO approx. $29,000

Your telling me that they are committing a conspiracy and this is not to be criticized?

specsaregood
07-15-2011, 09:05 PM
Who the hells this??
HOMEMAKER $2,120,162.38

That is from the wives of the banksters.

Teaser Rate
07-15-2011, 09:06 PM
MERRILL LYNCH $25,700.00
GOLDMAN SACH & CO. $235,750.00
MORGAN STANLEY $113,700.00
WELLS FARGO approx. $29,000

Your telling me that they are committing a conspiracy and this is not to be criticized?

Investment bankers make lots of money and have a high stake in the political process, as such they're going to be at the top of most campaigns' donation lists.

Seth
07-15-2011, 09:12 PM
Actually, no other candidate is getting even close to the amount as Romney is from the bankers. He also has way more money from "homemakers" than Obama who raised far more than anyone. Obama only has around 300k from homemakers.

VoluntaryAmerican
07-15-2011, 09:17 PM
Investment bankers make lots of money and have a high stake in the political process, as such they're going to be at the top of most campaigns' donation lists.

Your right, Mitt promised some favors, bankers pay some money. The American way.

Teaser Rate
07-15-2011, 09:17 PM
Actually, no other candidate is getting even close to the amount as Romney is from the bankers. He also has way more money from "homemakers" than Obama who raised far more than anyone. Obama only has around 300k from homemakers.

Saying that Romney is a shill for the banking sector because bankers donated to his campaign makes as much sense as saying that Ron Paul is a shill for white nationalism because white supremacists donated to his campaign.

VoluntaryAmerican
07-15-2011, 09:24 PM
Saying that Romney is a shill for the banking sector because bankers donated to his campaign makes as much sense as saying that Ron Paul is a shill for white nationalism because white supremacists donated to his campaign.

The white supremacist sector did not support Ron Paul, it was one independent group. That simple fact breaks your logic.

Seth
07-15-2011, 09:24 PM
Not even comparable. If all of Paul's top donors were racist organizations you might have a point...

amy31416
07-15-2011, 09:45 PM
Actually, no other candidate is getting even close to the amount as Romney is from the bankers. He also has way more money from "homemakers" than Obama who raised far more than anyone. Obama only has around 300k from homemakers.

Couldn't that be from the many, many "wives" in Utah?

Lafayette
07-15-2011, 09:50 PM
Donated to Dr Paul...

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA $301.20

WTF?!

Carehn
07-15-2011, 10:26 PM
Strange that he got $2.1 mil from "homemakers". Ron Paul got $0 from "homemakers".

lada mormon homemakers

Seth
07-15-2011, 10:31 PM
lada mormon homemakers

Lots of banker's wives too. :p

Sola_Fide
07-15-2011, 10:34 PM
The bankers have their candidate.... wow...

ForLiberty2012
07-15-2011, 11:12 PM
Top donor are homemakers??? What??? How does one candidate get 2mil+ from "Homemarker" and the other get nothing from them? Please explain that one.

and Goldman Sachs 200k for romney.... 0 for Ron Paul.

harikaried
07-15-2011, 11:44 PM
Homemaker $2,120,162.38You can look through the individual donation listings for the homemakers.
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00431171/736177/sa/17A

I wonder why such a focus on real estate.

Teaser Rate
07-16-2011, 12:16 AM
The white supremacist sector did not support Ron Paul, it was one independent group. That simple fact breaks your logic.


Not even comparable. If all of Paul's top donors were racist organizations you might have a point...

Special pleading.


The bankers have their candidate.... wow...

I'm so sick of the stereotype that bankers are somehow a united front trying to hijack the government for their own benefit. I'll have you know that bankers are as diverse in their beliefs as any other group of people and many of them happen to be libertarians.

Banker is not a dirty word.

Slutter McGee
07-16-2011, 12:35 AM
Special pleading.



I'm so sick of the stereotype that bankers are somehow a united front trying to hijack the government for their own benefit. I'll have you know that bankers are as diverse in their beliefs as any other group of people and many of them happen to be libertarians.

Banker is not a dirty word.

Thank you so much. I don't like the government partnership with the huge banks, just like everyone else here. But to turn the word "banker" into a dirty name is a diservice.

Sincerely,

A Person Who Speaks With Bankers Everyday For My Job

dcdreamboat
07-16-2011, 05:54 AM
I don't have a problem with bankers, my problem is with CENTRAL bankers.

LisaNY
07-16-2011, 06:07 AM
fwiw I work for one of those firms on that list - and my $$'s going to the Champion of the Constitution!!

Sola_Fide
07-16-2011, 06:16 AM
Special pleading.



I'm so sick of the stereotype that bankers are somehow a united front trying to hijack the government for their own benefit. I'll have you know that bankers are as diverse in their beliefs as any other group of people and many of them happen to be libertarians.

Banker is not a dirty word.


LoL. Why are you so sensitive about that word?
Banks are not necessarily evil, and bankers are not necessarily evil. But when you mix in government, there's where the mischief begins. I know that what I'm saying is just not computing to you...I realize that. You still think that government can somehow be reformed without monetary reform. I don't know why you think this, but I guess you do.

We come from two different worlds. You think central planning is a good thing. I don't.

PastaRocket848
07-16-2011, 09:18 AM
I think investment banker or "banker" is a bad term now because the general public has been effected by their actions in a negative way. Of course not every investment banker took long-shots with people's 401k's, but many did. On a deeper level, the whole financial "industry" is a root cause of the decrease in actual output and production of real goods in the economy. Ron always talks about our #1 export being dollar bills. there's more gain in moving a few numbers in a computer than inventing something we can sell. So, I think people justifiably hate the system, but they shouldn't blame the guy doing his job making a living for it.