PDA

View Full Version : TIME Begins Rigging "Baracketology" Poll




Warrior_of_Freedom
06-27-2011, 04:34 PM
It went from this http://i51.tinypic.com/2q2pvu8.png
to this http://i55.tinypic.com/2ztdc95.png
They forgot to keep the same Graph design when rigging it. Shame on them. I bet Mitt Romney will pass Ron Paul conveniently before they publish the poll.

Note: here the rigging is discussed, apparently they changed the poll results for a short while to make it look like Mitt Romney has even a bigger piece of the pie. http://www.dailypaul.com/168642/time-bracketology-poll-rigged

I urge anyone that has a subscription to this magazine to call up and cancel, being specific on why you are cancelling.
I have about 20 snapshots of the poll results and I haven't seen Paul's % go up ONCE.

Also note how close Paul's and Romney's colors are. Another member pointed this out a week ago.


link to the poll htt p://www.time.com/time/gopbracket/

Warrior_of_Freedom
06-28-2011, 03:49 AM
bump

Sentinelrv
06-28-2011, 05:06 AM
Are you sure it's not just that they've been adding in the mail-in votes. I would think that would boost Romney's total more, since older people don't use the internet as much and wouldn't vote in the online poll. It would only make sense that more support for Romney would show up later on when the mail-in votes started showing up at Time's office.

sailingaway
06-28-2011, 09:35 AM
Are you sure it's not just that they've been adding in the mail-in votes. I would think that would boost Romney's total more, since older people don't use the internet as much and wouldn't vote in the online poll. It would only make sense that more support for Romney would show up later on when the mail-in votes started showing up at Time's office.

I just bought the magazine so I can mail in. I encourage people to use the print and mail option. I am sure people brain dead enough to subscribe to Time are unlikely to pick a decent candidate.

(I subscribed to it some time ago, but I hadn't figured out news wasn't in Time and the Wall Street Journal yet.)