bobbyw24
06-22-2011, 06:04 AM
[Thanks romacox for the heads up]
Posted by Ilya Shapiro
Hard cases make bad law, the saying goes. Well, a bizarre case that the Supreme Court decided unanimously today has set a good precedent for the enforcement of residual Tenth Amendment powers.
As I described in December when Cato filed a brief in Bond v. United States:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/of-course-defendants-can-challenge-the-constitutionality-of-laws-under-which-theyre-prosecuted/#utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29
Posted by Ilya Shapiro
Hard cases make bad law, the saying goes. Well, a bizarre case that the Supreme Court decided unanimously today has set a good precedent for the enforcement of residual Tenth Amendment powers.
As I described in December when Cato filed a brief in Bond v. United States:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/of-course-defendants-can-challenge-the-constitutionality-of-laws-under-which-theyre-prosecuted/#utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29