PDA

View Full Version : House Passes FY 2012 Agriculture Spending Bill that Spends More than FY 2011




tsai3904
06-16-2011, 07:57 PM
http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=247105


House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers today commended the House for passing H.R. 2112, the Fiscal Year 2012 Agriculture Appropriations Bill. The legislation funds the various programs within the Department of Agriculture and related agencies, and totals $125.5 billion in both discretionary and mandatory funding, a reduction of more than $7 billion from the President’s request. The bill reduces discretionary spending by $2.7 billion from last year’s level – a cut of more than $5 billion from the President’s request. The bill passed on a vote of 217-203.

Although the press release states that the bill reduces discretionary spending from last year's level by $2.7 billion, it fails to reveal that non-discretionary spending increases from last year's level by $3 billion (source here (http://appropriations.house.gov/UploadedFiles/6.13.11_FY_12_Agriculture_Conference_Summary.pdf) (pdf)).

The Republicans will come out saying that they cut discretionary spending and cut spending compared to the President's budget, but in the end, the bill increases spending year over year.

According to Justin Amash here (http://www.facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/211645898874824), the bill "spends taxpayer dollars on such projects as the breastfeeding performance awards".

I didn't believe it at first so I had to look up the text of the bill, and sure enough it's there:

not less than $75,000,000 shall be used for breastfeeding peer counselors and other related activities, and not less than $7,500,000 shall be used for breastfeeding performance awards

The best part of the bill comes from the fact that each bill must state where in the Constitution the House gets the authority to pass the bill. As the sponsor of the bill, Rep. Jack Kingston states,

"clause 1 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution (the spending power) provides: ‘‘The Congress shall have the Power . . . to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States. . . .’’

So now the Republicans are also using the common defense and general welfare clause to justify their actions.

Only 19 Republicans voted against this bill, including Ron Paul, Justin Amash, Walter Jones, and Jeff Flake. Vote results here (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2011-459).

tsai3904
06-16-2011, 11:04 PM
Also included in the Agriculture Appropriations Bill is an amendment offered by Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) that would prohibit the use of $147 million that is sent to the Brazil Cotton Institute.

The background on this is that Brazil challenged our domestic subsidies to cotton farmers and prevailed in the WTO. Instead of eliminating the subsidies, we reached an agreement with the Brazilian government to send $147 million to their Brazil Cotton Institute.

The irony is that more Democrats voted to end this "bribe" to Brazil than Republicans. The Republicans argued that if we didn't send Brazil the $147 million, Brazil would enact harmful trade policies. Basically, the Republicans want to subsidize domestic cotton farmers and pay Brazil to keep them happy.

95 Republicans voted in favor to end the payments to Brazil while 141 voted against it. Vote results here (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2011-439).

Looking into these bills, it's hard to have any hope that we'll be able to dig out of the mess we're in ($1.6 trillion deficits, $14 trillion debt, and who knows how many trillions in unfunded liabilities).