CIA website goes down, hackers claim responsibility

[hillbilly123069]

I wonder what that does for their surveylence of us.
http://beta.news.yahoo.com/cia-website-goes-down-hackers-claim-responsibility-002426685.html

[hillbilly123069]

I'm trying to stay updated on this story. I think they locked it down
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/16/us-cia-hackers-idUSTRE75E6JC20110616

[FrankRep]

US Agency Calls for New Cybersecurity Standards
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/229792/us_agency_calls_for_new_cybersecurity_standards.ht ml

H.R. 4061: Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2010
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4061

[acptulsa]

I wonder what that does for their surveillaence of us

Not much. Pity they didn't hack the NSA.

[MikeStanart]

Great, more justification for Big Brother to go Orwellian all over our asses.

[FrankRep]

Not much. Pity they didn't hack the NSA.

The government feels the same way.

[pcosmar]

Great, more justification for Big Brother to go Orwellian all over our asses.

They were already doing that. And have been accelerating there efforts.

This is a response of people that do not accept it and are actively resisting.

This is going to become a question over who CONTROLS the Web. People or Government.
Freedom or Authoritarianism.

If they shut down the web, they cut their own communications and profits.
Hackers built the web, Hackers run the web.
Either everyone uses it or NO One does.

[specsaregood]

This is the same group that supposedly hacked the senate internal servers earlier this week.

It's more and more looking like a govt frontgroup to me.

[KingRobbStark]

In the cyber world the government stands no chance regardless of any laws it may impose.

[pcosmar]

This is the same group that supposedly hacked the senate internal servers earlier this week.

It's more and more looking like a govt frontgroup to me.

They are also the ones that took down HBGary and exposed a government connected (illegal) Bot Net.

[FrankRep]

In the cyber world the government stands no chance regardless of any laws it may impose.

http://files.sharenator.com/challenge_accepted_RE_Dragkyre_Vs_Nightmare_Our_mi necraft_Challenge-s325x265-177836.png

[oyarde]

I wonder what that does for their surveylence of us.
http://beta.news.yahoo.com/cia-website-goes-down-hackers-claim-responsibility-002426685.html

That stuff works in the old Indian Territory ? :)

[specsaregood]

They are also the ones that took down HBGary and exposed a government connected (illegal) Bot Net.

True enough.

[belian78]

A friend posted on his FB about this. Apparently this group angered someone named 'jester' (spelled in leet speek) and he is now going after this group.

Reading the comments made me feel ignorant because I had no idea what they were talking about. LOL

[pcosmar]

http://files.sharenator.com/challenge_accepted_RE_Dragkyre_Vs_Nightmare_Our_mi necraft_Challenge-s325x265-177836.png

:confused:

What do you mean by that? Are you in favor of Government control of the internet?

[FrankRep]

:confused:

What do you mean by that? Are you in favor of Government control of the internet?

He just challenged the government to regulate the Internet. The government accepted that challenge. It's humor.

[pcosmar]

A friend posted on his FB about this. Apparently this group angered someone named 'jester' (spelled in leet speek) and he is now going after this group.

Reading the comments made me feel ignorant because I had no idea what they were talking about. LOL
"Jester" is Government sponsored Hacker. (yes they do have some)

[FrankRep]

"Jester" is Government sponsored Hacker. (yes they do have some)

Yep.

Federal Government Has Recruited One-Fourth of U.S. Hackers as Informants (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/7818-fed-govt-has-recruited-one-fourth-of-us-hackers-as-informants)

[pcosmar]

He just challenged the government to regulate the Internet. The government accepted that challenge. It's humor.

Clue.
The government is already regulating up the internet if you hadn't noticed. And have been proposing more and more controls for years.
Do you think "Net Neutrality" is about internet freedom or internet control.

Freedom of Information or Control of information?

[FrankRep]

Clue.
The government is already regulating up the internet if you hadn't noticed. And have been proposing more and more controls for years.
Do you think "Net Neutrality" is about internet freedom or internet control.
I'm anti-Net Neutrality and the government wants More Control of the Internet.

[pcosmar]

I'm anti-Net Neutrality and the government wants More Control of the Internet.

As Am I.
I'm rooting for the Freedom Fighters.
Yes, the odds are against them. but I believe they are the "good guys" here.

[libertygrl]

I'm trying to stay updated on this story. I think they locked it down
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/16/us-cia-hackers-idUSTRE75E6JC20110616

Problem, reaction, solution. I'm just saying there's always that possibility.

[Tyr]

This is the same group that supposedly hacked the senate internal servers earlier this week.

It's more and more looking like a govt frontgroup to me.

This group has supposedly hacked the FBI, in addition to Sony, Xbox and other businesses, supposedly hacked the senate as well as the CIA now, publicly published their NJ phone number on Twitter and registered a website. All while publishing peoples personal info all over the 'net(a dead giveaway). Meanwhile our Government cannot find these guys and the only solution is the internet kill switch and Gov't oversight of the web. Riiiight.

There's little doubt in my mind this is a Government operation and these hackers are sitting in cush offices at Langley while they work. Conspiracy theory? No, common sense. There are too many open holes in the whole deal.

[ItsTime]

This is why the government needs more power over the internet.

[Nastynate]

If the government thinks they can stop hackers by passing laws shows just how little they know about computers and technology.

[One Last Battle!]

Yep.

Federal Government Has Recruited One-Fourth of U.S. Hackers as Informants (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/7818-fed-govt-has-recruited-one-fourth-of-us-hackers-as-informants)

Evidently they picked up the retarded ones.

[acptulsa]

That stuff works in the old Indian Territory ? :)

lulz Yeah, we got a little information technology lyin' around somewheres here...

You forget we're right in the middle of the continent. We aren't just the pipeline hub, we're also crisscrossed with fiber optics.


If the government thinks they can stop hackers by passing laws shows just how little they know about computers and technology.

They aren't ignorant. They're just counting on the majority of voters to be ignorant.

[KingRobbStark]

Evidently they picked up the retarded ones.

hahaha

[squarepusher]

http://www.neowin.net/news/lulzsec-ddos-magnetscom-then-ddos-their-customer-support-line

The group did provide some explanation as to why they attacked the website in a tweet which noted that they [LulzSec] called magnets.com and that they wouldn’t tell them how magnets worked.

[squarepusher]

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6446763/Fuck_FBI_FridayA_a__A__%28FFF%29

. /$$ /$$ /$$$$$$
.| $$ | $$ /$$__ $$
.| $$ /$$ /$$| $$ /$$$$$$$$| $$ \__/ /$$$$$$ /$$$$$$$
.| $$ | $$ | $$| $$|____ /$$/| $$$$$$ /$$__ $$ /$$_____/
.| $$ | $$ | $$| $$ /$$$$/ \____ $$| $$$$$$$$| $$
.| $$ | $$ | $$| $$ /$$__/ /$$ \ $$| $$_____/| $$
.| $$$$$$$$| $$$$$$/| $$ /$$$$$$$$| $$$$$$/| $$$$$$$| $$$$$$.$
.|________/ \______/ |__/|________/ \______/ \_______/ \_______/
//Laughing at your security since 2011!

.-- .-""-.
. ) ( )
. ( ) (
. / )
. (_ _) 0_,-.__
. (_ )_ |_.-._/
. ( ) |lulz..\
. (__) |__--_/
. |'' ``\ |
. | [Lulz] \ | /b/
. | \ ,,,---===?A`\ | ,==y'
. ___,,,,,---==""\ |M] \ | ;|\ |>
. _ _ \ ___,|H,,---==""""bno,
. o O (_) (_) \ / _ AWAW/
. / _(+)_ dMM/
. \@_,,,,,,---==" \ \\|// MW/
.--''''" === d/
. // SET SAIL FOR FAIL!
. ,'_________________________
. \ \ \ \ ,/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
. _____ ,' ~~~ .-""-.~~~~~~ .-""-.
. .-""-. ///==--- /`-._ ..-' -.__..-'
. `-.__..-' =====\\\\\\ V/ .---\.
. ~~~~~~~~~~~~, _',--/_.\ .-""-.
. .-""-.___` -- \| -.__..-


Dear Internets,

It has come to our unfortunate attention that NATO and our good friend Barrack
Osama-Llama 24th-century Obama have recently upped the stakes with regard to hacking.
They now treat hacking as an act of war. So, we just hacked an FBI affiliated website
(Infragard, specifically the Atlanta chapter) and leaked its user base. We also took
complete control over the site and defaced it, check it out if it's still up: http://infragardatlanta.org/

While not very many logins (around 180), we'd like to take the time to point out that all
of them are affiliated with the FBI in some way. Most of them reuse their passwords in other places,
which is heavily frowned upon in the FBI/Infragard handbook and generally everywhere else too.

One of them, Karim Hijazi, used his Infragard password for his personal gmail, and the gmail of
the company he owns. "Unveillance", a whitehat company that specializes in data breaches and botnets,
was compromised because of Karim's incompetence. We stole all of his personal emails and his company
emails. We also briefly took over, among other things, their servers and their botnet control panel.

After doing so, we contacted Karim and told him what we did. After a few discussions, he offered to
pay us to eliminate his competitors through illegal hacking means in return for our silence. Karim,
a member of an FBI-related website, was willing to give us money and inside info in order to destroy
his opponents in the whitehat world. We even discussed plans for him to give us insider botnet information.

Naturally we were just stringing him along to further expose the corruption of whitehats.
Please find enclosed Karim's full contact details and a log of him talking to us through IRC.
Also, enjoy 924 of his internal company emails - we have his personal gmail too, unreleased.

We call upon journalists and other writers to delve through the emails carefully, as we have
uncovered an operation orchestrated by Unveillance and others to control and assess Libyan
cyberspace through malicious means: the U.S. government is funding the CSFI to attack Libya's
cyber infrastructure. You will find the emails of all 23 people involved in the emails.

Unveillance was also involved in a scheme where they paid an Indian registrar $2000 to
receive 100 domains a month that may be deemed as botnet C&Cs. Shameful ploys by supposed "whitehats".

We accept your threats, NATO. Game on, losers.

Now we are all sons of bitches,

Lulz Security

---

How to open the lulzy emails:
- Sail over here: http://www.mozillamessaging.com/thunderbird/
- Get this thing that changes filetypes: http://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/Download.php
- Grab your booty (the email files) and change their extension to ".eml" using the above tool
- copy/drag into your Thunderbird sailing vessel

Happy plundering!

[Mach]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?297979-Video-A99-OpESR-Communication-2-Ctrl-Alt-Bernanke&highlight=A99+OpESR+Communication


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XySGw-g2tyk

:rolleyes:

;)

:cool:

[FrankRep]

Problem, reaction, solution. I'm just saying there's always that possibility.

No worries. The Government is going to protect us from the big bad hackers.


NSA, Internet Providers Teaming Up To Monitor Web Traffic / Cybersecurity Threats
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?298991-NSA-Internet-Providers-Teaming-Up-To-Monitor-Web-Traffic-Cybersecurity-Threats

[awake]

Jeez.. what are we going to do with out access to the CIA website.

With all of the hacking lately, the measures to try and control the internet are that much easier to implement. In fact, a sustained campaign of internet vandalism is precisely the tactic that will eventually shape public opinion toward government intervention. First create chaos, then offer protection from it - the state is expert in creating its own demand.

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

50 federal reserve notes says the CIA hacked themselves.

[ds21089]

I was thinking that these stories are bogus simply for the government to say "oh look how we're getting hacked..if WE can get hacked, YOU can even easier. Let us regulate your internet for YOUR security"

[FrankRep]

I was thinking that these stories are bogus simply for the government to say "oh look how we're getting hacked..if WE can get hacked, YOU can even easier. Let us regulate your internet for YOUR security"
NSA, Internet Providers Teaming Up To Monitor Web Traffic / Cybersecurity Threats
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?298991-NSA-Internet-Providers-Teaming-Up-To-Monitor-Web-Traffic-Cybersecurity-Threats

[Bruno]

50 federal reserve notes says the CIA hacked themselves.

Did you see squarepusher's post?

[tropicangela]

http://pastebin.com/HZtH523f


Dear Internets,

This is Lulz Security, better known as those evil bastards from twitter. We just hit 1000 tweets, and as such we thought it best to have a little chit-chat with our friends (and foes).

For the past month and a bit, we've been causing mayhem and chaos throughout the Internet, attacking several targets including PBS, Sony, Fox, porn websites, FBI, CIA, the U.S. government, Sony some more, online gaming servers (by request of callers, not by our own choice), Sony again, and of course our good friend Sony.

While we've gained many, many supporters, we do have a mass of enemies, albeit mainly gamers. The main anti-LulzSec argument suggests that we're going to bring down more Internet laws by continuing our public shenanigans, and that our actions are causing clowns with pens to write new rules for you. But what if we just hadn't released anything? What if we were silent? That would mean we would be secretly inside FBI affiliates right now, inside PBS, inside Sony... watching... abusing...

Do you think every hacker announces everything they've hacked? We certainly haven't, and we're damn sure others are playing the silent game. Do you feel safe with your Facebook accounts, your Google Mail accounts, your Skype accounts? What makes you think a hacker isn't silently sitting inside all of these right now, sniping out individual people, or perhaps selling them off? You are a peon to these people. A toy. A string of characters with a value.

This is what you should be fearful of, not us releasing things publicly, but the fact that someone hasn't released something publicly. We're sitting on 200,000 Brink users right now that we never gave out. It might make you feel safe knowing we told you, so that Brink users may change their passwords. What if we hadn't told you? No one would be aware of this theft, and we'd have a fresh 200,000 peons to abuse, completely unaware of a breach.

Yes, yes, there's always the argument that releasing everything in full is just as evil, what with accounts being stolen and abused, but welcome to 2011. This is the lulz lizard era, where we do things just because we find it entertaining. Watching someone's Facebook picture turn into a penis and seeing their sister's shocked response is priceless. Receiving angry emails from the man you just sent 10 dildos to because he can't secure his Amazon password is priceless. You find it funny to watch havoc unfold, and we find it funny to cause it. We release personal data so that equally evil people can entertain us with what they do with it.

Most of you reading this love the idea of wrecking someone else's online experience anonymously. It's appealing and unique, there are no two account hijackings that are the same, no two suddenly enraged girlfriends with the same expression when you admit to killing prostitutes from her boyfriend's recently stolen MSN account, and there's certainly no limit to the lulz lizardry that we all partake in on some level.

And that's all there is to it, that's what appeals to our Internet generation. We're attracted to fast-changing scenarios, we can't stand repetitiveness, and we want our shot of entertainment or we just go and browse something else, like an unimpressed zombie. Nyan-nyan-nyan-nyan-nyan-nyan-nyan-nyan, anyway...

Nobody is truly causing the Internet to slip one way or the other, it's an inevitable outcome for us humans. We find, we nom nom nom, we move onto something else that's yummier. We've been entertaining you 1000 times with 140 characters or less, and we'll continue creating things that are exciting and new until we're brought to justice, which we might well be. But you know, we just don't give a living fuck at this point - you'll forget about us in 3 months' time when there's a new scandal to gawk at, or a new shiny thing to click on via your 2D light-filled rectangle. People who can make things work better within this rectangle have power over others; the whitehats who charge $10,000 for something we could teach you how to do over the course of a weekend, providing you aren't mentally disabled.

This is the Internet, where we screw each other over for a jolt of satisfaction. There are peons and lulz lizards; trolls and victims. There's losers that post shit they think matters, and other losers telling them their shit does not matter. In this situation, we are both of these parties, because we're fully aware that every single person that reached this final sentence just wasted a few moments of their time.

Thank you, bitches.

Lulz Security

[squarepusher]

Lulz Sec, 19 year old kid arrested?

http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/06/21/suspected-lulzsec-mastermind-arrested/

[pcosmar]

Lulz Sec, 19 year old kid arrested?

http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/06/21/suspected-lulzsec-mastermind-arrested/


and has been connected with a number of individuals who are reported to be involved with LulzSec
Grasping at straws and catching low hanging fruit.

or just a report that they are doing something (even if they are wrong)

[tasteless]

Lulz Sec, 19 year old kid arrested?

http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/06/21/suspected-lulzsec-mastermind-arrested/

He just runs the chat channels. Not as important as the media is trying to make him out to be.


"The good news everybody: Ryan has little to do with #LulzSec besides running IRC. All 6 members of @LulzSec are fine and safe." #AntiSec