PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul Is Winning




smtwngrl
10-29-2007, 11:55 AM
http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=141787

terlinguatx
10-29-2007, 12:00 PM
...

Nate K
10-29-2007, 12:15 PM
start sending praise emails to the writer

Zydeco
10-29-2007, 12:17 PM
Notice how intellectually bankrupt the attacks are: Ron Paul takes donations from neo-nazis, Ron Paul puts pork into appropriations bills, etc.

We're gonna win this!

OceanMachine7
10-29-2007, 12:21 PM
He makes a great point about the "yard sign" indicator being a better sign of support than "scientific polls". Here in Maryland in 2002, Ehrlich was trailing Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in the polls but his bumper stickers were everywhere and he cruised to victory.

conner_condor
10-29-2007, 12:31 PM
We can see the cake now, but we can't back off till we get it in our mouths. Landslide this election to make sure they will not fuck with Ron Paul without knowing there will be a blowback never seen before in this country if something happens to our President.

Recovering Socialist
10-29-2007, 12:43 PM
RON PAUL **IS** WINNING
He is winning our country back by talking about issues that are important. He is pulling the debate his direction. He is wrapping himself in the constitution and bill of rights and making other so-called conservatives look like....well you know...the emperor with no clothes.

He is bringing intelligence to the debate, a debate that had candidates trying to out due each other in supporting torture. :(

Yes Ron Paul is winning the intellectual debate!

McCain is right, America is a right of center country. Ron Paul is the only right of center candidate to promise the troops home immediately. He is a unique product.

But its time to stop talking about the gold standard and pulling troops out of S Korea. Keep it simple, because winning the election is not about winning the "intellectual arguement" probably it could be, after we put learning and civics lessons back into our schools.

-Patrick Rogers

Liberty
10-29-2007, 12:45 PM
He makes a great point about the "yard sign" indicator being a better sign of support than "scientific polls". Here in Maryland in 2002, Ehrlich was trailing Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in the polls but his bumper stickers were everywhere and he cruised to victory.

Include Ron's successful fundraising and something doesn't add up about these polls. Are they trying to create a perception that he can't win, so potential new supporters shy away or is it due to low name recognition?

Zydeco
10-29-2007, 12:46 PM
But its time to stop talking about the gold standard

Well, can we talk about the collapsing dollar? Dollar Index now at 76 and change, which is off 40% from 2000, when it was over 120. That's right -- a $10 bill in 2001 is now worth six f-ing dollars.

THAT we should talk about.

Zydeco
10-29-2007, 12:48 PM
Include Ron's successful fundraising and something doesn't add up about these polls. Are they trying to create a perception that he can't win, so potential new supporters shy away or is it due to low name recognition?

Yes, what's wrong with the polls is that they're bogus. If you think "rigged" is too strong a word then I won't use it (that's for you, Brad), but explain to me what utility exists in, for example, the latest FOX News polls, which puts Giuliani at 31% and Ron Paul at 1%.

Giuliani has 31 times more support than Ron Paul. Who are you going to believe, a "scientific poll" or your own lying eyes?

conner_condor
10-29-2007, 01:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4

PatriotG
10-29-2007, 01:55 PM
This was originally on the Constitution Party's (http://www.constitutionparty.com/) website:

Is The Vote Rigged? Effort To Expose Computer Vote Fraud Leads To Lawsuit. (http://www.restoretherepublic.org/?p=25)

We posted it on ours also.

Just trying to spread the word

RP in 2008

PatriotG

Recovering Socialist
10-29-2007, 02:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4

What an eye opener!

Jordan
10-29-2007, 02:07 PM
Not to discredit this news, but I think usadaily is just putting out RP articles for our traffic.

Its working too.

Recovering Socialist
10-29-2007, 02:11 PM
But its time to stop talking about the gold standard

Well, can we talk about the collapsing dollar? Dollar Index now at 76 and change, which is off 40% from 2000, when it was over 120. That's right -- a $10 bill in 2001 is now worth six f-ing dollars.

THAT we should talk about.

My point isn't to knock his platform, my point is to keep it simple since most people do not understand how a gold standard will help. I used the goldstandard as only an example.
People love change, but worry about uncertainty, I think balancing the budget and bringing troops home are changes people feel confident about. Scrapping the federal reserve, going on the gold standard, ending social security, and trying to over turn Roe vs Wade may be weaker points for him to make in a 30 sec spot.

I want to be clear about my support, if we can give a near-monkey like Bush a chance to run the country we can give a American (almost)hero like Ron too.

-Patrick Rogers

Primbs
10-29-2007, 02:20 PM
He makes a great point about the "yard sign" indicator being a better sign of support than "scientific polls". Here in Maryland in 2002, Ehrlich was trailing Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in the polls but his bumper stickers were everywhere and he cruised to victory.

That was the first time in thirty years a Republican had won the governor's office.

Los Angeles had a 5 to 1 ratio of dems to reps and Riordan in 1993 ran a campaign the used 30,000 to forty thousand signs along with direct mail and a strong grassroots campaign. A thirty second spot on LA TV is prohibitive.

Riordan won the primary after an exit poll on TV showed him losing. The television station pulled that poll down by about 8:30 P.M., but this poll had people in stunned disbelief because all indications were that Riordan would win.

PatriotG
10-29-2007, 02:41 PM
"I want to be clear about my support, if we can give a near-monkey like Bush a chance to run the country we can give a American (almost)hero like Ron too."

Here Here !!!

PatriotG

Restore The Republic.Org (http://www.restoretherepublic.org)

smtwngrl
10-29-2007, 03:45 PM
He makes a great point about the "yard sign" indicator being a better sign of support than "scientific polls". Here in Maryland in 2002, Ehrlich was trailing Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in the polls but his bumper stickers were everywhere and he cruised to victory.

Wow, that's great to know! I'm glad you mentioned it. :D

Broadlighter
10-29-2007, 04:07 PM
What was so surprising about Senator Dodd’s appearance yesterday was his statement that “…the first thing I would do on January 20th, 2009… is restore the Constitution. I’m very worried about where we’re headed… ” When was the last time we heard a Democrat state he wants to restore the Constitution! Does that make Dodd a Jeffersonian Democrat? Is Dodd a Ron Paul Democrat who wants to restore limited government and a noninterventionist foreign policy? Not quite.

Isn't this a bit of irony. Last I remember Chris Dodd was advocating MANDATORY CIVIL SERVICE for post High School or College grads. Where in the Constitution is that supported?

Is it any wonder younger voters are attracted to Ron Paul? Hillary wants to force 20-somethings to get health insurance. Dodd wants compulsory civil service for the same population.

I'm almost 50, but if I were 18-24, I'd be spreading this message to my peers as quickly as possible. Sure, these Dems want to end the war, but that doesn't mean their willing forego enslaving you.

Peterjar
10-29-2007, 04:22 PM
Hate to be a drag but...Unless we win this thing hands down, by 10 percentage points at least, they are just going to steal it like the last two. We need to start raising awareness about election fraud.