PDA

View Full Version : As the U.S. Constitution is Fluid, The Declaration of Independence is Foundational




Uncle Emanuel Watkins
05-21-2011, 05:50 PM
Another writ by Uncle Emanuel Watkins.
An example of how interpretation is meant to be always changing and fluid in matters concerning the U.S. Constitution is how power is expressed today by the judicial branch of the U.S. Supreme Court. As that particular branch of power started off without knowing what was intended of it, my argument is that the Supreme Court today is exercizing its power irresponsibility in regards to the people's best interest. As the legislative branch of the U.S. Congress has to be the most powerful branch in regards to what should be deemed constitutional or not, the Supreme Court's functioning ruling over those questions is in contempt of the people and their Civil Purpose.
Rather than the Supreme Court judge the issue of constitutionality, the U.S. House of Representatives should be handling that responsibility.
Like all power, the powers of the U.S. Constitution were left dynamic and fluid for the sake of the people and their Civil Purpose which means the U.S. Supreme Court should be sitting in judgment of whether each representative of the House and each senator of the Senate are representing properly the people of their districts and their states respectively. Any internal systems determined by the House and Senate are a conflict of interest and should be deemed against the Civil Purpose of the people. So, ultimately, the system of the House and the Senate should be determined based on what is in the best interests of the people in regards to whether their internal organizations and functions violate the people's Civil Purpose.
In other words, The U.S. Constitution is left intentionally fluid in regards to the people's Civil Purpose with this being what is in the best interests of the disadvantaged.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
05-23-2011, 10:07 PM
Revision, rewrite, and bump.
If the authoritory structure within a flock of sheep is sufficient to fend for itself, one might be curious about the authority expressed by the shepherd. Indeed, the shepherd at times will abandon the flock to seek out a weak, lost member of it. While the flock of sheep are left vulnerable during this time, the shepherd understands predatory nature and how it always seeks out to kill the weakest member. In redeeming this weakest member and bringing it back into the flock, the shepherd has defied gravity robbing from its predatory nature while bringing forth a profit in life. This newness brings forth smiles and happiness which is the people's Civil Purpose.

Chester Copperpot
05-23-2011, 10:24 PM
all 3 branches can individually deem what is and what isn't constitutional...

malkusm
05-23-2011, 10:30 PM
Related to this, I had a question a few weeks ago.....

As justification for their raids of online poker websites a few weeks ago, the Department of Justice cited the websites to be in violation of the 1961 Federal Wire Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Wire_Act). This act was written around 30 years before the Internet existed. So, if Federal law written 30 years prior to an invention is valid to regulate the invention, why is the Constitution -- a much more basic, simply-worded set of laws and principles -- considered to be "outdated"?

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
05-23-2011, 10:52 PM
Related to this, I had a question a few weeks ago.....

As justification for their raids of online poker websites a few weeks ago, the Department of Justice cited the websites to be in violation of the 1961 Federal Wire Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Wire_Act). This act was written around 30 years before the Internet existed. So, if Federal law written 30 years prior to an invention is valid to regulate the invention, why is the Constitution -- a much more basic, simply-worded set of laws and principles -- considered to be "outdated"?

As the two party system was implemented to make the Federal government work better, the Federal government, in turn, was intended to serve the people at best as a "more perfect union." When our Founders created a more perfect union, they were thinking in terms of not perfection but something better than the tyranny that existed prior to that. So, in essence, the Federal government today serves our nation as a "necessary tyranny."
While the development of the two party system was done so to serve the best interests of the necessary tyranny ruling over our nation, the advent of the American Movement returns people to The Declaration of Independence. It is during times when our nation is returning by way of American Movements to our Civil Purpose declared in the Declaration of Independence that The U.S. Constitution works as it was originally intended.
You see, our Founding Fathers didn't create the American Movements with this philosophical culture developing since the time they established both The Declaration of Independence and The U.S. Constitution.