PDA

View Full Version : New bill upgrades unauthorized Internet streaming to a felony




aGameOfThrones
05-16-2011, 06:27 PM
Two months ago, US Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Victoria Espinel produced her wishlist of changes to US law. One item in particular caught our interest—the suggestion that the online streaming of copyrighted content be bumped up to a full-scale felony. Late last week, Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced just such a bill.

The text of S. 978 isn't yet available from the official THOMAS system, but Klobuchar's office sent us a copy of the brief bill. Under current law, "reproducing" and "distributing" copyrighted works are felony charges and cover P2P transfers and Web downloads. But streaming is a "public performance" rather than a "distribution"—and holding a public performance without a proper license is not a felony. S. 978 adds "public performance" to the felony list.

Online streamers can now face up to five years in prison and a fine in cases where:

They show 10 or more "public performances" by electronic means in any 180-day period and

The total retail value of those performances tops $2,500 or the cost of licensing such performances is greater than $5,000

Movie makers and theater owners support the bill.*


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/new-bill-upgrades-unauthorized-internet-streaming-to-a-felony.ars

TCE
05-16-2011, 06:30 PM
Wait a minute, is this streaming or uploading them onto the web? Basically, does this apply to those viewing the stream or those uploading the stream? It appears to be the latter, although I can see how criminalizing the posting of videos would prevent people from viewing them...

aGameOfThrones
05-16-2011, 06:48 PM
Wait a minute, is this streaming or uploading them onto the web? Basically, does this apply to those viewing the stream or those uploading the stream? It appears to be the latter, although I can see how criminalizing the posting of videos would prevent people from viewing them...


Viewing from the looks of it. Maybe it's operators.