TSA checking diapers

[Anti Federalist]

Pictures can speak a thousand words.

What is this one saying?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/lb9nk.jpg

[acptulsa]

That they're indoctrinating the children well. And that molestation from the very people who won't even allow photos to be distributed of what they do is, well, more than a little hypocritical. To use the mildest term I can think of.

So, if they find contraband in the diaper, do they do anything about it? I think we need to feed our babies very, very well just prior to boarding airplanes as a standard thing. When you have a cadre of 'professional' molesters with the government's blessing, I can't imagine a better way to defend your children.

[madengr]

Hmm, that was taken an MCI (Kansas City). It's actually not TSA, but First Line Security (http://www.firstlinets.com/). One of the few airports with non-government screeners, however, same blue shirted assholes. Probably the same asshole that took my electronics Leatherman last month.

[Anti Federalist]

Hmm, that was taken an MCI (Kansas City). It's actually not TSA, but First Line Security (http://www.firstlinets.com/). One of the few airports with non-government security, however, same assholes in a blue suit.

Nice find, thanks for the update and additional info.

I suppose it doesn't really matter though.

Private security has to follow the exact same TSA "policies".

[aGameOfThrones]

Checking for dirty bombs, obviously. I feel safe!

[aGameOfThrones]

Pictures can speak a thousand words.

What is this one saying?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/lb9nk.jpg

A mundane teaching a future mundane how to submit?

[acptulsa]

If the government commits a crime, iis it a crime? The Constitution says yes. Nixon said no.

And people wonder why we want to preserve, protect and defend that document.

[Anti Federalist]

If the government commits a crime, iis it a crime? The Constitution says yes. Nixon said no.

And people wonder why we want to preserve, protect and defend that document.

A maxim that government has clearly taken to heart.

The massive federal monolith commits a slew of felonies a day, with nary a blink of an eye.

What's so unsettling is that it has convinced the people, thoroughly, completely and without question, that such action is right and true and "just".

[sailingaway]

This is where you have to train your kid....

[Anti Federalist]

A mundane teaching a future mundane how to submit?

They hate us for our freedoms?

[KCIndy]

Pictures can speak a thousand words.

What is this one saying?



Same Shit. Different Day.

[aGameOfThrones]

They hate us for our freedoms?

Of course. They love us for our "safety" measures?

[acptulsa]

Of course. They love us for our "safety" measures?

Well, it certainly makes the grass a lot less greener on our side of the fence.

[CaliforniaMom]

Look at their sick smiles... disgusting.

[Krugerrand]

He Won't Touch Your Junk
Ron Paul for President 2012

[Brian4Liberty]

They will also be referring people whose children have full diapers or diaper rash to Child Protective Services...

[Lucille]

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001339119/TSA_Nazi_Logo2_small1_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wDdNiYA4zwY/TOP0Q51_zHI/AAAAAAAAFwo/Hc3OErIqqbk/s1600/nazi%2Bchecking%2Bunderwear.jpg

[awake]

http://i55.tinypic.com/j7w7ma.jpg

[MelissaWV]

Here's the thing. This won't shock anyone that supports the TSA because, frankly, if you're going to assume people are carrying bombs... you should check everywhere. A baby's diaper would be a great place to hide components to a weapon. A fake limp or even an implant could be rigged to blow us all to kingdom come. A pair of dentures (I don't know why people are still allowed to wear them on flights if everything else is banned) could conceal any number of chemical components in hollow teeth which could be mixed once aboard.

If you're going to have goons trying to "assure safety," then this is automatically part of that process, so folks are going to shrug and say it's important to be safe.

[heavenlyboy34]

wow...getting more Orwellian by the day around here. :eek:

[Vessol]

http://i56.tinypic.com/29esnpf.jpg

Fucking awesome.

Shared.

[nolvorite]

It makes no damn sense man thats retarded

[Vessol]

It makes no damn sense man thats retarded

Watch your mouth mundane.

Those terrorists could strike anywhere at anytime.

I'm sure they found a lot of evidence at Osama's compound that gave away the evil plot of hiding nanobombs in children's poop.

They just can't release that info because it will incite the terrorists.

[Lucille]

That's awesome, Awake, but wouldn't that be serfdom?

[heavenlyboy34]

That's awesome, Awake, but wouldn't that be serfdom?

yep. Bad spell-checker! Bad!

[awake]

That's awesome, Awake, but wouldn't that be serfdom?
opps...lol...edit coming

[Bruno]

Would also like to see that pic with serfdom not mispelified.

[Anti Federalist]

That's awesome, Awake, but wouldn't that be serfdom?

+1 it is, awesome and "serfdom".

[Anti Federalist]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wDdNiYA4zwY/TOP0Q51_zHI/AAAAAAAAFwo/Hc3OErIqqbk/s1600/nazi%2Bchecking%2Bunderwear.jpg

"They search the woman's private body parts, forcing her husband and children to watch."

Image saved.

Oh, RPF, expect to see that picture again.

[awake]

362

[Anti Federalist]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=362&d=1304982762

+rep

[Bruno]

Excellent. Shared on fb. Thanks!

[Anti Federalist]

No doubt, and I'm sure that's where the vast majority of people "are" in their thinking on this.

Conditioned to be "safe" above everything else, they will, quite literally, blanch at nothing if it is sold to them as furthering that goal.

I'm convinced that cops could roast infants on a BBQ in front of the police station and nobody would say a word, if they were convinced it was to "keep them safe".

That's why government surveillance cameras will be ubiquitous in the coming years, even in places where they are not now, including inside your home.


Here's the thing. This won't shock anyone that supports the TSA because, frankly, if you're going to assume people are carrying bombs... you should check everywhere. A baby's diaper would be a great place to hide components to a weapon. A fake limp or even an implant could be rigged to blow us all to kingdom come. A pair of dentures (I don't know why people are still allowed to wear them on flights if everything else is banned) could conceal any number of chemical components in hollow teeth which could be mixed once aboard.

If you're going to have goons trying to "assure safety," then this is automatically part of that process, so folks are going to shrug and say it's important to be safe.

[NewRightLibertarian]

No doubt, and I'm sure that's where the vast majority of people "are" in their thinking on this.

Conditioned to be "safe" above everything else, they will, quite literally, blanch at nothing if it is sold to them as furthering that goal.

I'm convinced that cops could roast infants on a BBQ in front of the police station and nobody would say a word, if they were convinced it was to "keep them safe".

That's why government surveillance cameras will be ubiquitous in the coming years, even in places where they are not now, including inside your home.

They'd do it if they could get away with it. They want power and control, they are ruthless and they will stop at nothing. Molesting children is just the start

[Anti Federalist]

They'd do it if they could get away with it. They want power and control, they are ruthless and they will stop at nothing. Molesting children is just the start

Bing - fucking - go.

[heavenlyboy34]

No doubt, and I'm sure that's where the vast majority of people "are" in their thinking on this.

Conditioned to be "safe" above everything else, they will, quite literally, blanch at nothing if it is sold to them as furthering that goal.

I'm convinced that cops could roast infants on a BBQ in front of the police station and nobody would say a word, if they were convinced it was to "keep them safe".

That's why government surveillance cameras will be ubiquitous in the coming years, even in places where they are not now, including inside your home.

I don't doubt it at all. I was on another board earlier that is inhabited by great hordes of Boobus Americanus. A fellow wrote today in regards to complaints about ever-more-intrusive surveilance statism: "i never understood why this is an issue with some people... if you have nothing to hide, why is it an issue?" It was an EPIC facepalm moment.

[TruckinMike]

I don't worry about terrorist like all of you --- Every since I purchased my anti-AL-CIAda amulet (by wamo) I haven't been attacked even once. No truck hijackings, no lot lizard terroristic threats, nothing. NADA! Yep, you to can sleep good at night for only $29.95... or three easy payments of only $15.95. And if you order today you'll get the free bonus space alien live trap (bait not included). So act now and Call 1-800-I'm-dumb

http://ny-image1.etsy.com/il_570xN.238937021.jpg

[heavenlyboy34]

I don't worry about terrorist like all of you --- Every since I purchased my anti-AL-CIAda amulet (by wamo) I haven't been attacked even once. No truck hijackings, no lot lizard terroristic threats, nothing. NADA! Yep, you to can sleep good at night for only $29.95... or three easy payments of only $15.95. And if you order today you'll get the free bonus space alien live trap (bait not included). So act now and Call 1-800-I'm-dumb

http://ny-image1.etsy.com/il_570xN.238937021.jpg
Did you forget the /sarcasm tag, or are you just insane?

[Marenco]

http://www.libertystickers.com/static/images/productimage-picture-orwell-said-this-would-happen-663.gif

[RonPaulGetsIt]

We need to abolish the TSA and let the free market decide how much security we need. People who want crazy invasive procedures cen fly those airlines. Everyone else can choose the regular metal detector route...or whatever they decide. get the govt out of it.

http://www.freemarketfan.com/2010/11/free-market-in-air-security.html

[Anti Federalist]

I don't doubt it at all. I was on another board earlier that is inhabited by great hordes of Boobus Americanus. A fellow wrote today in regards to complaints about ever-more-intrusive surveilance statism: "i never understood why this is an issue with some people... if you have nothing to hide, why is it an issue?" It was an EPIC facepalm moment.

That is mental illness that cannot be "educated" away.

[Anti Federalist]

ROFL rep


I don't worry about terrorist like all of you --- Every since I purchased my anti-AL-CIAda amulet (by wamo) I haven't been attacked even once. No truck hijackings, no lot lizard terroristic threats, nothing. NADA! Yep, you to can sleep good at night for only $29.95... or three easy payments of only $15.95. And if you order today you'll get the free bonus space alien live trap (bait not included). So act now and Call 1-800-I'm-dumb

http://ny-image1.etsy.com/il_570xN.238937021.jpg

[Anti Federalist]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wDdNiYA4zwY/TOP0Q51_zHI/AAAAAAAAFwo/Hc3OErIqqbk/s1600/nazi%2Bchecking%2Bunderwear.jpg

http://view1.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/10266130/tsa-screens-passengers/tsa-screens-passengers.jpg?size=380&imageId=10266130

[UtahApocalypse]

My response on FB:


If we are concerned that the terrorists may stuff a babies diaper with something then we are already past the point of ANY safety measures. I fully expect the rectal and vaginal exams to begin this year.

[heavenlyboy34]

That is mental illness that cannot be "educated" away.

Yeah, I learned that the hard way. No rational arguments (no matter how sound), appeals to morality/justice, citing laws or the Constitution works with these sorts of people. It's like talking/writing to a fucking brick wall.

[Chester Copperpot]

Theyre checking that kid for smelly bombs

[jkr]

2 2 far

[Marenco]

http://media.nationaljournal.com/?controllerName=image&action=get&id=2275&width=990&height=

[kahless]

I hope they are changing their gloves especially before checking the babies diaper. They could be exposing the baby to all kinds of bacteria.

If they are handling a thousand people all over and then want to do the same to me I even want them to change their gloves before checking me. I wonder what the reaction will be. Hopefully they are not going to stop me from flying if I ask.

Maybe I should drive instead.

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiIg3yIYmCE&feature=grec_index

[Lucille]

Here's the thing. This won't shock anyone that supports the TSA because, frankly, if you're going to assume people are carrying bombs... you should check everywhere. A baby's diaper would be a great place to hide components to a weapon. A fake limp or even an implant could be rigged to blow us all to kingdom come. A pair of dentures (I don't know why people are still allowed to wear them on flights if everything else is banned) could conceal any number of chemical components in hollow teeth which could be mixed once aboard.

If you're going to have goons trying to "assure safety," then this is automatically part of that process, so folks are going to shrug and say it's important to be safe.

Good call, at least for some quivering weasels (http://www.fredoneverything.net/Bob.shtml) at HotAir (http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2011/05/10/i-do-not-believe-that-an-8-month-old-constitutes-a-security-threat/).

[doodle]

Being little babies and kids is no longer the fun it used to be once.

[heavenlyboy34]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiig3yiymce&feature=grec_index
lmfao!!! :d:d

[heavenlyboy34]

Being little babies and kids is no longer the fun it used to be once.

It's been that way for at least a decade or so, IIRC. I think my generation was the last to recall simple pleasures like drinking out of the garden hose, playing in the dirt and mud, climbing trees, etc. :(

[specsaregood]

What's so unsettling is that it has convinced the people, thoroughly, completely and without question, that such action is right and true and "just".

I posted this in another thread, but this is just as good a place to post it:


..The Oliners conducted over 700 interviews with survivors of Nazi occupied Europe -- both "rescuers" (those who actively rescued victims of Nazi persecution) and "non-rescuers" (those who were either passive in the face of the persecution or actively involved in it). The study revealed profound differences in the upbringing of the two groups -- in both the language and practices the parents used to teach their values.

Non-rescuers were twenty-one times more likely than rescuers to have grown up in families that emphasized obedience -- being given rules that were to be followed without question -- while rescuers were over three times more likely than non-rescuers to identify "reasoning" as an element of their moral education. "Explained," the authors note, "is the word most rescuers favored" in describing their parents' way of communicating rules and ethical concepts.

[doodle]

He Won't Touch Your Junk
Ron Paul for President 2012

Sounds promising.

[Anti Federalist]

I posted this in another thread, but this is just as good a place to post it:


Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
..The Oliners conducted over 700 interviews with survivors of Nazi occupied Europe -- both "rescuers" (those who actively rescued victims of Nazi persecution) and "non-rescuers" (those who were either passive in the face of the persecution or actively involved in it). The study revealed profound differences in the upbringing of the two groups -- in both the language and practices the parents used to teach their values.

Non-rescuers were twenty-one times more likely than rescuers to have grown up in families that emphasized obedience -- being given rules that were to be followed without question -- while rescuers were over three times more likely than non-rescuers to identify "reasoning" as an element of their moral education. "Explained," the authors note, "is the word most rescuers favored" in describing their parents' way of communicating rules and ethical concepts.



That is interesting information, thanks for posting.

[doodle]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wDdNiYA4zwY/TOP0Q51_zHI/AAAAAAAAFwo/Hc3OErIqqbk/s1600/nazi%2Bchecking%2Bunderwear.jpg

Incredible.

[Anti Federalist]

Incredible.

They hate us for our freedom.

[Mani]

I don't doubt it at all. I was on another board earlier that is inhabited by great hordes of Boobus Americanus. A fellow wrote today in regards to complaints about ever-more-intrusive surveilance statism: "i never understood why this is an issue with some people... if you have nothing to hide, why is it an issue?" It was an EPIC facepalm moment.

I don't know what the answer is to this problem, because THIS IS A VERY COMMON THOUGHT PROCESS!!!!

I've heard it many times. If you have nothing to hide, what's the big deal????

I used to listen to this conservative talk show host from tampa, he used to always defend the patriot act and anything else that showed complete disregard for the 4th amendment and this was what he said over and over again. He would be on the radio talking while thousands and thousands of people are listening and he used to laugh off anyone who disagreed with the Patriot Act or TSA or any other STATIST weapon.

Schmitt or something was his name. Fucking NEOCON.

[Anti Federalist]

I don't know what the answer is to this problem, because THIS IS A VERY COMMON THOUGHT PROCESS!!!!

I've heard it many times. If you have nothing to hide, what's the big deal????

I used to listen to this conservative talk show host from tampa, he used to always defend the patriot act and anything else that showed complete disregard for the 4th amendment and this was what he said over and over again. He would be on the radio talking while thousands and thousands of people are listening and he used to laugh off anyone who disagreed with the Patriot Act or TSA or any other STATIST weapon.

Schmitt or something was his name. Fucking NEOCON.

That's right, I'm not doing anything wrong, so you have no right to look.

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

That's right, I'm not doing anything wrong, so you have no right to look.

Silly simpleton! This is Napoleon's America. You are guilty until proven INNOCENT. Don't you know anything!?

[MelissaWV]

Your wife has nothing to hide. Why is she wearing clothing?

Your mother has nothing to hide. She should spread her legs to ensure she isn't "the tampon bomber."

Your father has nothing to hide. He should get more familiar with a TSA agent than with his proctologist.

Your child has nothing to hide. You should tell them to stop crying when some stranger frisks them, searches through their toys, and tries to act "friendly" (but do not be surprised if your child is willing to go with strangers in their daily life, even into the fabled "free candy" van).

You have nothing to hide. Please give up. Bend and spread, and keep your family in line.

[aGameOfThrones]

Your wife has nothing to hide. Why is she wearing clothing?

Your mother has nothing to hide. She should spread her legs to ensure she isn't "the tampon bomber."

Your father has nothing to hide. He should get more familiar with a TSA agent than with his proctologist.

Your child has nothing to hide. You should tell them to stop crying when some stranger frisks them, searches through their toys, and tries to act "friendly" (but do not be surprised if your child is willing to go with strangers in their daily life, even into the fabled "free candy" van).

You have nothing to hide. Please give up. Bend and spread, and keep your family in line.

Seems reasonable :p