So first Pakistan denies knowing UBL was there, now they condemn us?

[AndrewD]

"Pakistan criticized the American raid that killed Osama bin Laden as an "unauthorized unilateral action" and warned Washington on Tuesday not to launch similar operations in the future."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110503/ap_on_bi_ge/as_pakistan_bin_laden


Pakistan has been playing two sides of the coin this entire time, and we Americans (actually Hillary and her goons) are the laughing stock. They have been accepting billions from us, and you think the Taliban weren't paying them to hide away UBL? Of course they were. Collecting from both sides. Our foreign aid policy is shameful.

[ExPatPaki]

I really doubt the Taliban was paying Pakistan to hide OBL. If Pakistan was hiding OBL, they did it on their own accord.

[Noob]

All the drone attacks on them is more than enough for them to condemn America.

[pcosmar]

Pakistan has been playing two sides of the coin this entire time, and we Americans (actually Hillary and her goons) are the laughing stock. They have been accepting billions from us, and you think the Taliban weren't paying them to hide away UBL? Of course they were. Collecting from both sides. Our foreign aid policy is shameful.
:confused:
WTF
The CIA has been fucking with Pakistan for some time.
We just murdered a bunch of women and children inside one of their cities.

I have no idea who was killed. But doubt it was OBL.

They have very good reason to be pissed.

[doodle]

Highly dount Musharaf or other top leaders knew if some elements in ISI did help him, it's somewhat splitered still even if most of Afghan jihad supporters had been isolated by Pakistanis from ISI. There maybe a motive to milk billions in military aid to keep the war on terror going as long as possible but don't think our agencies would be that oblivious to the nature of at times startined cooperation between the two agencies. Lately it has been more starined with Obama ordered drone attacks killing many civilians in border areas.

I was reading earlier their President's piece in today's Wapo, he did seem bit crazy when he was hitting on Sarah Palin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkFnaFyylQ8) while back, but his view on this seems somewhat credible:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pakistan-did-its-part/2011/05/02/AFHxmybF_story.html?hpid=z6

[jmdrake]

Methinks Pakistan should through caution to the wind and spill the beans on what the CIA knew and provide documentation.

[ExPatPaki]

I was reading earlier their President's piece in today's Wapo, he did seem bit crazy when he was hitting on Sarah Palin while back, but his view on this seems somewhat credible:


He is quite the scumbag for hitting on Palin less than 6 months after his wife's assassination. Of course, she just giggled like a dumb school girl when this ugly sleazeball hit on her.

[ExPatPaki]

Shut Up, Rachel

There’s no evidence Pakistan shielded Osama bin Laden (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/05/03/shut-up-rachel/)


The most ridiculous part of her rant, however, was when she started talking about the history of US-Pakistan relations, and the connection of both governments to al-Qaeda. Sure, she said, we aided bin Laden in the 1980s, sending him weapons in order to fight the Soviets – but who, she asked, was the “middle man”? We didn’t deal directly with al-Qaeda, but through a third party. And who was that party? It was – aha! – Pakistan!

So there! That “proves” it! The Pakistanis are evil, treacherous snakes-in-the-grass because … they followed our instructions to the letter.

[Brian4Liberty]

Shut Up, Rachel

There’s no evidence Pakistan shielded Osama bin Laden (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/05/03/shut-up-rachel/)

Good article. It's not out of the realm of possibilities that very few people knew about Bin Laden hiding there. Actually it's a likely explanation. It's also quite possible that if we had let Pakistan Intelligence in on this raid before hand, that the information would have found it's way to Bin Laden and allowed him to escape.