PDA

View Full Version : If Bin Ladin's dead, we must demand an immediate end to the War on Terror




BarryDonegan
05-01-2011, 08:53 PM
If this isn't ended now, it will never end. This could be a high watermark in American confidence.

The stakes are high. We must push now to end these wars.

doodle
05-01-2011, 08:57 PM
They will claim that war on terror catalyst was not OBL but our foreign policy, so since we still have same FP, the rationale for never endong global war on terror is still intact.

Sola_Fide
05-01-2011, 08:58 PM
Did we kill Osama or did he die of something else?

Matt Collins
05-01-2011, 09:01 PM
CNN was rambling on about how "this isn't the end to terrorism, just one faction of it, in fact we need to heighten our awareness....and expect some blowback from many elements around the world who consider him a hero"

Michael Landon
05-01-2011, 09:03 PM
CNN was rambling on about how "this isn't the end to terrorism, just one faction of it, in fact we need to heighten our awareness....and expect some blowback from many elements around the world who consider him a hero"

"Blowback? There's no such thing. They'll attack us, not because of bin Laden's death but, because they hate our freedoms." - Neo-Cons

- ML

Vessol
05-01-2011, 09:04 PM
CNN just said live that they are raising the national security level.

low preference guy
05-01-2011, 09:04 PM
Did we kill Osama or did he die of something else?

Update (AP): Fox News says he was killed in a missile strike last week and that they’ve been waiting on an announcement until they had DNA confirmation from the remains that it was him. If there was ever a question of discontinuing drone attacks in Pakistan, there won’t be after this.

BarryDonegan
05-01-2011, 09:04 PM
CNN was rambling on about how "this isn't the end to terrorism, just one faction of it, in fact we need to heighten our awareness....and expect some blowback from many elements around the world who consider him a hero"

I agree that this argument they are using will be pushed forward and will work, but only for a little while unless we really are attacked. In just a short amount of time, the rest of the American people will begin to wonder why we are still over in these engagements if Bin Ladin is dead. They won't even be able to use that argument anymore.

IMO, now is the time to start talking about how it needs to end as we are a few weeks away from these wars making even less sense.

Peace&Freedom
05-01-2011, 09:12 PM
Osama died in Dec. 2001, they've needed him for years to prop up the 9-11 false flag basis for the WOT, but now realize they can't trot out the same old file footage out for another 10 years---so it's time to finally play the Osama card to save Barry's Presidency. "OBAMA GOT OSAMA," here come the headlines and T-shirts. Most of all, hear comes another tidal wave of usage of terror as an emotional shield to push for more security, war and omni-surveillance, this time to help protect us from "al Qaeda taking revenge" this 9-11 over the death of Osama. Barry's timing is precise. He's using the news cycle to shut people up and put them back to sleep, just as the GOP debates start, lest they be persuaded by Paul to rethink the Empire.

emazur
05-01-2011, 09:27 PM
We should demand it, but it's not going to happen. Remember how Bush said he wasn't worried about bin Laden anymore? How often since the '08 election have you heard ANYONE saying we need to get bin Laden? It happens, but not very often. (+REP for the first person to bring me a quote, if it exists, from Obama prior to today saying he wasn't concerned about hunting bin Laden). Here's something Wayne Allyn Root wrote in '09 (http://www.rootforamerica.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry091203-154412):

If we are going to fight this war, we had better be able to answer the simple question: “Why are we in Afghanistan?” While watching the NBC Evenings News on Wednesday night, I heard two very disturbing statements by 4-star General Stanley McCrystal, the commanding general of our war efforts in Afghanistan. First he stated we were there “not to conquer, not for glory, not for money…but rather to help the Afghan people shape their future.” Is that why we're there? Silly me. I thought we were there to punish and destroy our enemies in the war on terrorism. Even our generals are now recruited into Obama's politically-correct world.

Afghanistan stopped being a bin Laden ~ Al Qaeda hunting mission long ago, it is and will continue to be a nation-building mission (and least that will be the U.S. government's front).

tangent4ronpaul
05-01-2011, 09:36 PM
CNN just said live that they are raising the national security level.

ok - now we have 2 levels elevated and attack eminent. In the latter case, they are supposed to tell us where it is expected and what we should do. Remember - no more color codes?

Isn't it odd that this wouldn't have happened a week ago - I mean the terrorists surely know he died a week ago. If they were going to do something in retaliation, wouldn't have been then? For that matter, overseas news outlets should have picked up on the news, like al jazeera - and we hear nothing till now?

This does not add up.

we are definitely being lied to about something.

oh fuck - poetic drewel from Obama about the towers falling and smoke coming up from the pentagon - VOMIT!

-t

RP Supporter
05-01-2011, 09:40 PM
Well, on the plus side, does anyone think this might make some Republicans stay out of the race? Huckabee especially seemed to be 50/50. He's probably less likely to run now that Obama will look unbeatable. At least in the short term.

Bin Laden's death may mean the Republican field is overall weaker, which can only help Paul.

Matt Collins
05-01-2011, 09:45 PM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x93/sonicspikesalbum/Obama/n7940483_42408487_3633.jpg

Sola_Fide
05-01-2011, 09:49 PM
Did we shoot him in the head or blow him up with a missle?

low preference guy
05-01-2011, 09:50 PM
Did we shoot him in the head or blow him up with a missle?

he was shot in the head apparently

stefank
05-01-2011, 09:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI

thetruthhurtsthefed
05-02-2011, 01:03 AM
The war on terror is too profitable. First thing out of Obummer's mouth was ...we must continue to be vigilant....translation: were gonna keep pumping the oil in Iraq and harvesting the poppies in the Afghanistan and our troops will guard them

cdc482
05-02-2011, 01:49 AM
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Osama-is-Dead-End-the-Wars/121003037978358

Teaser Rate
05-02-2011, 06:02 AM
Osama died in Dec. 2001, they've needed him for years to prop up the 9-11 false flag basis for the WOT, but now realize they can't trot out the same old file footage out for another 10 years---so it's time to finally play the Osama card to save Barry's Presidency. "OBAMA GOT OSAMA," here come the headlines and T-shirts. Most of all, hear comes another tidal wave of usage of terror as an emotional shield to push for more security, war and omni-surveillance, this time to help protect us from "al Qaeda taking revenge" this 9-11 over the death of Osama. Barry's timing is precise. He's using the news cycle to shut people up and put them back to sleep, just as the GOP debates start, lest they be persuaded by Paul to rethink the Empire.

I was really hoping that actually killing him ourselves would finally end the retarded conspiracy theories which claim he's been dead for 10 years.

tangent4ronpaul
05-02-2011, 06:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI

Somhow I think the local Comunity College that we might be tabling at might just object to that clip.... but I REALLY LIKE IT!

bobbyw24
05-02-2011, 06:17 AM
Now that we have killed Osama Bin Laden, can we end the "War on Terror," bring our troops back from the Middle East. Let's do things that help Americans and not big corporations; things like ending The Fed, abolishing the IRS and repealing the PATRIOT Act.

rawful
05-02-2011, 06:19 AM
Some talking head on one of the networks just said "this is just the beginning" of the War on Terror. I want to leave this planet.

smithtg
05-02-2011, 06:21 AM
The "war on terror" is indefinite and will always be. Just like in 1984. l listened to the lamestream media this morning on the radio - subliminal messages everywhere

My favorite - I wrote this down word for word to not lose the 'value'

"REMINDER - the war on terror is not over"

yes word for word, I am starting a new thread on just that phrase because that is what the sheeple hear and will be taught to believe because few of them can think for themselves

another -

"american embassies on high alert for anti-American violance"

and its a sad day when our president can say this and be cheered

"Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people." - President Obama May 1, 2011

What is so great about going overseas and killing someone?

Live_Free_Or_Die
05-02-2011, 06:40 AM
nt

smithtg
05-02-2011, 06:42 AM
new headline. Security measures beefed 'up' - if the war on terror was over, you could have the freedoms you used to have 15 years ago

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/02/security-measures-beefed-new-york-airports-wtc-site/

thedude
05-02-2011, 06:44 AM
I am in complete agreement. The mission accomplished bring the troops home messages need to go viral immediately. The stakes are very high.

Osama Bin Laden is DEAD, bring home the troops
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Osama-Bin-Laden-is-DEAD-bring-home-the-troops/197274156982096

Sign up!

vita3
05-02-2011, 06:48 AM
The "war on terror" was always going to be perptual

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

Joseph
05-02-2011, 07:04 AM
I feel like deja-vu, This is like the third time they have cried Bin Laden's death.

So we were in Pakistan unconstitutionally and 10 years later we kill Bin Laden with small force, the way Ron Paul said it should have been done in the first place.

So I guess we had no reason to be in Afghanistan after all, does this mean we'll leave? Probably not, and does this mean we'll leave Pakistan too? Probably not. What about our bases in Iraq? There probably going to stay.

Where else do we have aggressive drones or troops or bombings?

vita3
05-02-2011, 07:05 AM
What a great long weeked for the rubes of the World.

Osama has been killed & "buried @ sea" & they had the cherished memories of the Royal Wedding.. all in 72 hours!

JohnGalt1225
05-02-2011, 07:16 AM
This is frustrating. Facebook is plastered with patriotard statuses and messages. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm not a "truther" (all the way anyway, I mean I do think something shady went on maybe but I'm not hardcore about it) and I'm not a "birther." But this HAS to be a set up. It just doesn't add up. It was way too convenient of timing.

pacelli
05-02-2011, 07:19 AM
Yep, no need for the TSA or the fusion centers anymore.

stefank
05-02-2011, 07:30 AM
http://johndennisreport.com/war-on-terror/how-much-of-the-war-was-necessary-to-catch-osama good article

mczerone
05-02-2011, 07:52 AM
Why was killing Osama even a priority?

Obviously the Pentagon knew that announcing the death would only fan the flames of the "terrorists", and lead to a more violent outcome than letting an old man (who was not implicated in the 9/11 attacks) die alone in the Pakistani hills.

Oh, and the Drudge is running the headline that "Muslim Brotherhood is calling for the end of the war on terror" - so apparently we're already siding with the terrorists in calling for peace.

jmdrake
05-02-2011, 09:21 AM
If this isn't ended now, it will never end. This could be a high watermark in American confidence.

The stakes are high. We must push now to end these wars.

Bump because you're one of the few that gets it. The "cry in our beer crowd because it hurts us" or the "let's not say anything because that might hurt us" crowd don't.

smithtg
05-02-2011, 10:52 AM
foxnews is ready....


http://www.foxnews.com/images/root_images/050211_REVENGE_20110502_114136.jpg

Matt Collins
05-02-2011, 11:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhXt4BjLL0g

Peace&Freedom
05-02-2011, 11:50 AM
I was really hoping that actually killing him ourselves would finally end the retarded conspiracy theories which claim he's been dead for 10 years.

Claim? it was reported by Fox News at the time. Bhutto (before her assassination) plainly stated he was dead years ago, as various US and other government officials (Steve Pieczenik et al) also admitted 9 times over the years. Since the body being claimed to be Osama has already been disposed of at sea, so no one can independently check, are you going to challenge the government's retarded claim? For further reference:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TeYyHt3JZ4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnychOXj9Tg

http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/15-01-2008/103426-benazir_bhutto_osama-0/

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts302.html

cdc482
05-02-2011, 11:54 AM
Osama died in Dec. 2001, they've needed him for years to prop up the 9-11 false flag basis for the WOT, but now realize they can't trot out the same old file footage out for another 10 years---so it's time to finally play the Osama card to save Barry's Presidency. "OBAMA GOT OSAMA," here come the headlines and T-shirts. Most of all, hear comes another tidal wave of usage of terror as an emotional shield to push for more security, war and omni-surveillance, this time to help protect us from "al Qaeda taking revenge" this 9-11 over the death of Osama. Barry's timing is precise. He's using the news cycle to shut people up and put them back to sleep, just as the GOP debates start, lest they be persuaded by Paul to rethink the Empire.


That's exactly how I interpreted it. It's right before the election. Americans are always unlikely to vote out the incumbent in a time of war. Now this...
It's politics for 2012.

Maximilian American
05-02-2011, 03:09 PM
bump

heavenlyboy34
05-02-2011, 03:14 PM
claim? It was reported by fox news at the time. Bhutto (before her assassination) plainly stated he was dead years ago, as various us and other government officials (steve pachinick et al) also admitted 9 times over the years. Since the body being claimed to be osama has already been disposed of at sea, so no one can independently check, are you going to challenge the government's retarded claim? For further reference:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4teyyht3jz4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unychoxj9tg

http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/15-01-2008/103426-benazir_bhutto_osama-0/

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts302.html
ftw!!!