Ron Paul about to be on Sean Hannity Radio Show

[TNforPaul45]

Just FYI. Someone post a tube when you get it...

[low preference guy]

stream: http://player.streamtheworld.com/_players/citadel/?sid=5864

Does anyone know what time is Ron supposed to be on?

[low preference guy]

I just heard Hannity say "the interesting thing is" about some random topic. It's catching on.

[emazur]

I wish I had recorded the part where Hannity said he would never "bear false witness" about someone (Paul segment hasn't yet aired as I type this). We could totally smack him in the face with that

[payme_rick]

In Hannity-speak, this tube needs to be the antithesis of all other tubes and must be posted with great specificity!

[sratiug]

How does anyone listen to this jackass?

[sailingaway]

Hannity often uses his radio show to 'screen' his tv show. He might be asking about Ron's social security / medicare thing. Is it still coming on? I'm hearing about an idiot wedding. In England maybe?

[zacharyrow]

Hannity often uses his radio show to 'screen' his tv show. He might be asking about Ron's social security / medicare thing. Is it still coming on? I'm hearing about an idiot wedding. In England maybe?

He said just a minute ago "Ron Paul coming up later in the show" boo.

[sailingaway]

Are the rest of you hearing a discussion of women obeying their husbands?

[notsure]

It's a 3 hour show. I just heard Ron mentioned, he said he'll be on later.
Here's the call in number if anyone ever thought about calling in. 1.800.941.7326

[notsure]

Are the rest of you hearing a discussion of women obeying their husbands?

Yep. Now about birth certificates.

[payme_rick]

This dude is a ruhtard!

[thedude]

is he schooling listeners on inflation and the Federal Reserve? this is hannity?

[White Bear Lake]

I don't see how Hannity has got so big, he simply doesn't have that much talent. Rush pisses me off but I can see how he atleast has a huge amount of radio talent. Hannity just repeats slogans and doesn't go deep into anything.

[LisaNY]

is he schooling listeners on inflation and the Federal Reserve? this is hannity?

I know!!!!

[bobbyw24]

Hannity said that when the Fed prints money without abandon, we get high inflation

[sailingaway]

They just said Ron coming up.

[Working Poor]

is he schooling listeners on inflation and the federal reserve? This is hannity?

lol!!!

[specsaregood]

Hannity said that when the Fed prints money without abandon, we get high inflation

Dr. Paul changed the debate last go around...no doubt about it.

[bobbyw24]

Dr. Paul changed the debate last go around...no doubt about it.

That's right. Dr. Paul said he does not want power, but influence and he has got the latter now--not doubt

[pacelli]

ok. ron coming up, lets go for crying out loud. My area is under a tornado WARNING. They're telling our county to shelter in place RIGHT NOW.

[trey4sports]

ok. ron coming up, lets go for crying out loud. My area is under a tornado WARNING. They're telling our county to shelter in place RIGHT NOW.

Don't dare take shelter if you're the tube guy.

tubez > shelter

[TomtheTinker]

was it on yet?

[Fermli]

oh god Lamont Hill is on. can't bear to listen.

nah Paul hasn't been on yet.

[stefank]

delete

[thedude]

oh for the love of god... and they're going to have Paul on after this garbage? hannity is probably holding back the evil cackle

[pacelli]

they're having ron on after this racial debate to basically ensure that nobody is listening. this is fucked up.

[specsaregood]

oh for the love of god... and they're going to have Paul on after this garbage? hannity is probably holding back the evil cackle

This is pretty much par for the course on Hannity's show nowadays. I can't believe people listen to him.

[LisaNY]

I'm glad he's having Ron on his show though. I might send him a 'thank you' email.

[JamesButabi]

Ugh this is torture lol. Honestly I cant believe shows like these have a larger following than a show like FreeTalkLive. Its only a matter of time before that trend changes

[stefank]

ron paul on the top of the hour

[zacharyrow]

Top of the hour Paul will be on.

[thedude]

they're having ron on after this racial debate to basically ensure that nobody is listening. this is fucked up.

I am one of them...

Somebody tube it!

[payme_rick]

I almost do not want to listen to him talk to Ron because I know a good chunk of it will be "now congressman paul, what do your supporters have against little ole me?"

Just STFU about that already, geez...

I want Ron to say "Sean, be a man and let it go, I'm here to take care of business! Next question..."

[specsaregood]

I almost do not want to listen to him talk to Ron because I know a good chunk of it will be "now congressman paul, what do your supporters have against little ole me?"

Just STFU about that already, geez...

I want Ron to say "Sean, be a man and let it go, I'm here to take care of business! Next question..."

Yeah, in a way I hope we get the same Dr. Paul as was on the young turks. But maybe he is going to reserve that aggressive style for msnbc hosts. :)

[freshjiva]

I almost do not want to listen to him talk to Ron because I know a good chunk of it will be "now congressman paul, what do your supporters have against little ole me?"

Just STFU about that already, geez...

I want Ron to say "Sean, be a man and let it go, I'm here to take care of business! Next question..."

$50 says he'll mention it at least once.

[sailingaway]

I almost do not want to listen to him talk to Ron because I know a good chunk of it will be "now congressman paul, what do your supporters have against little ole me?"

Just STFU about that already, geez...

I want Ron to say "Sean, be a man and let it go, I'm here to take care of business! Next question..."

I'm not sure he will since he just confronted Ron on that on tv and Ron eventually said 'were you hurt?' and Hannity immediately changed the subject.

[specsaregood]

$50 says he'll mention it at least once.

Attention Paul people if you are reading and he mentions the snowballs.

Tell Hannity: that was last time, this time we are gonna pick up momentum and "snowball" all the way to the nomination!

[JCF]

Every time he has Rand on he brings up the Snowball incident, it's fucking annoying because anytime I talk to about Ron with Hannity listeners they always bring that up as some wedge against Ron.
--

Hannity always waits to have big name interviews, I guess it maximizes ratings/profits to have certain interviews during certain times of the day.

[georgiaboy]

I'm not sure he will since he just confronted Ron on that on tv and Ron eventually said 'were you hurt?' and Hannity immediately changed the subject.

beat me to it. loved that line.

[payme_rick]

Yeah, in a way I hope we get the same Dr. Paul as was on the young turks. But maybe he is going to reserve that aggressive style for msnbc hosts. :)

Lol...

Either way I hope he does well here because Sean can throw you off... Not because he's truely brilliant, but because he won't shut up...

[pacelli]

come on shammity.

[georgiaboy]

Every time he has Rand on he brings up the Snowball incident, it's fucking annoying because anytime I talk to about Ron with Hannity listeners they always bring that up as some wedge against Ron.
--

Hannity always waits to have big name interviews, I guess it maximizes ratings/profits to have certain interviews during certain times of the day.

Let's not forget the snowballs were in direct response to Sean's marginalizing Ron's massive text poll wins at the televised debates where Sean was supposed to be reporting and analyzing, in some sort of "fair and balanced" way.

[georgiaboy]

Let's see, Sean marginalizes the most conservative and best candidate for president to come around in years, throwing the election to Obama, and he and his minions complain about snowballs? ok.

[VBRonPaulFan]

Let's not forget the snowballs were in direct response to Sean's marginalizing Ron's massive text poll wins at the televised debates where Sean was supposed to be reporting and analyzing, in some sort of "fair and balanced" way.

yeah, what he did was f'd up and he deserved more than snowballs. he basically said that 'paulites' were flooding the polls and to ignore RP's results because it wasn't realistic.... jackass.

[LisaNY]

uugggh he's still going on about jeremiah wright and sharia law.

[Chieppa1]

$20 this about Israel/Muslims.

[cdc482]

This is pure torture. How can anyone listen to Hannity or believe he is a genuine person?

[trey4sports]

This is pure torture. How can anyone listen to Hannity or believe he is a genuine person?

hes a genuine douchebag

[TNforPaul45]

I'm guessing Ron will be on the show at the top at the hour like previous poster said.

Good thing about that is that Ron will be on at 5pm eastern, which is rush hour for the East Coast. Millions of people listening to Awn Shannity in traffic, will hear Ron.

Not bad.

[VBRonPaulFan]

that dude is seriously scared of muslims. i wonder if he pees himself a little bit when he walks close to someone with dark skin? in his world, obviously everyone from the middle east is strapped down with explosives on the daily.

[cdc482]

I almost do not want to listen to him talk to Ron because I know a good chunk of it will be "now congressman paul, what do your supporters have against little ole me?"

Just STFU about that already, geez...

I want Ron to say "Sean, be a man and let it go, I'm here to take care of business! Next question..."

nice. I think it'd be quite an accomplishment to not punch him in the face after what he just said, "black liberation theology, marxism, the devil, democrats, obama, EVIL!"

[Fermli]

an hour ago the conversation was on the same subject. what is this...

[cdc482]

Lol. Just found out about the snowball incident.
Yes, it's wrong. Yes, the RP campaign should stand against it, and stop it from happening in the future.
But whoever did it, WAY TO GO!

[tangent4ronpaul]

What's the snowball incident.

We pelted Hannity with snowballs in Iowa because he was treating Paul like shit. There should be some youtubes of it

Maybe it was NH and the youtube seems to be gone

[zerosdontcount]

Still not on yet? I just tuned in...

[Cowlesy]

Sean, we get it, Jeremiah Wright sucks. Seriously man, you need to sow seeds of doubt about what Obama really believes in your audience? Pretty sure they all hate him already as it stands.




zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[pacelli]

I feel like sean hannity is a fucking time murderer. They kill your time.. just a little bit... minute, by minute.

[Lucille]

If Hannity brings up sharia law again, I hope RP reminds him that the wars he loves so much built two Islamic states (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/260178/building-afghan-sharia-state-andrew-c-mccarthy) with Constitutions based on sharia law (http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w164.html).

[Sola_Fide]

Who can listen to this trash on a daily basis?

[Agorism]

Has Ron been up yet?

[stefank]

hes about to

[zerosdontcount]

You guys, get your mom 100 balloons for 19.99

[Agorism]

You listened to Sean Hannity. Therefor you're been...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

[sailingaway]

You guys, get your mom 100 balloons for 19.99

and make sure she obeys your dad (earlier hannity topic when I tuned in)

[cdc482]

OMFG guys,
Sean Hannity can get us 100 BLOOMS IN A VASE FOR 19.99!! And they are guaranteed to stay fresh! And for 10 bucks more, we get chocolate!
Where does he get these amazing connections for super deals!?

EDIT: I just threw up a little when he said to your mom, from me.

[jrice]

Don't think so... He's up next...

[JamesButabi]

RP coming up in 1 min

[JK/SEA]

i gotta take a dump...brb

[sailingaway]

Gates is being pushed into retirement? Or was working for first Bush than Obama just an impossible experience to top?

[Agorism]

link again?

[cdc482]

http://player.streamtheworld.com/_players/citadel/?sid=5864

[sailingaway]

link again?

lazy...

[Perry]

I've never heard so many F*cking commercials in my entire life.

[COpatriot]

Jesus this is awful.

[JK/SEA]

geezus...still ads?...

where's my snowball?....

[JCF]

The fucking snowballs.

[WilliamC]

Here we go...

[TNforPaul45]

Ah I get back to the computer and I hear "Snowballs."

Hannity grow some balls and quit asking about Snowballs

[cdc482]

What's the number? I wanna call him.

[Fermli]

Ron Paul is on NOW !

http://player.streamtheworld.com/_players/citadel/?sid=5864

[COpatriot]

And we're on

[cdc482]

Ron paul

haha snowballs

[Lucille]

Oh bruddah. The snowballs again.

[cdc482]

Nice answer Ron

[WilliamC]

Sean is a child whining about snowballs

[JK/SEA]

there it is...snowball in 15 seconds

[LisaNY]

oh for fucks sake sean GET OVER IT!

[JamesButabi]

lol couldnt go one sentence without mentioning the snowballs.

[zerosdontcount]

HAHA sean you stupid hoser, nobody cares about your snowball stories.

[Lucille]

Because Republicans today hate civil liberties.

[dbill27]

What's the number? I wanna call him.

1.800.941.7326

[cdc482]

Hannity is trying to sway his listeners, "He's not one of us. He's a libertarian."
Just like the MSNBC guy saying Ron "hates" America.

[low preference guy]

snowballs!

[johnrocks]

Well ain't this my damn luck, I've been listening to that boring ass show for two fucking hours just for the site to freeze up on me at this very moment in time! Sometimes I seriously hate computers!!!

[Jeremy]

Who cares that he keeps bringing up the snowballs. It's funny. Just don't throw them at him again.

[Lucille]

Exactly. Today's GOP "conserves" all of their progressive counterparts "achievements."

[Anti Federalist]

This thread is seriously making me LolZ

[specsaregood]

HAH! Dr. Paul says he is not an anarchist.

[WilliamC]

sean is giving Ron plenty of time at least

[tangent4ronpaul]

Well ain't this my damn luck, I've been listening to that boring ass show for two fucking hours just for the site to freeze up on me at this very moment in time! Sometimes I seriously hate computers!!!

same here - twice... it's those dang paultards - I tell ya! Must have all connected at once :D

[cdc482]

I'd go for an open boarders guy. Maybe one day you'll meet someone whose lived here for 20+ years, has a family, 2 girls, and a house. According to his boss, he has been one of the best workers at his job for over 20 years. He got picked up by immigration. His crime: being born in a poor country and working to make a living. That happened to a guy I know this morning.

[Jeremy]

Great interview so far.

[jrice]

Is it just me.... or is this interview going very well???

[IndianaPolitico]

He is doing quite well, he hit on how liberals want to intervene in people's lives. (A not so subtle jab at Hannity.)

[tangent4ronpaul]

Who cares that he keeps bringing up the snowballs. It's funny. Just don't throw them at him again.

OH COME ON! - it's become a tradition! :D

[low preference guy]

HAH! Dr. Paul says he is not an anarchist.

Haha. I heard that! Paraphrasing:


The anarchists want no government, which I'm not!

[TNforPaul45]

Talking about Blowback now.

[iamse7en]

Endorse him, Sean! Endorse him! Now!

Lol. I keed, I keed. Endorsement would sink his candidacy. :P

[dbill27]

Seans been sucking up to Ron lately.

[iamse7en]

Here we go. BLOWBACK.

[TNforPaul45]

Ron Paul is getting REALLY REALLY good at framing his message into a Neo-Con viewpoint. He is allowing for some of their main points while plugging them into our viewpoint overall.

Whoever has been talking with him and helping him come to this technique, I owe you a Mr. Pibb!!!

Brilliant! You can gain the "establishment"'s respect and still not give up our ideals!

Ron said it best "You and I can work together Sean"

[dbill27]

Blame bad policies!!!!

[cdc482]

Nice Ron. Imagine it from their perspective.

[IndianaPolitico]

Ron just hit the nail on the head, he just said in regards to terrorism, you don't blame America, you don't blame American citizens, you blame bad policies! Great point.

[jrice]

HA... Foreign policy... spoke to soon

[Lucille]

All Hannity ever does is repeat the same talking points, over and over and over...

[cdc482]

Sean totally just changed the subject, like "Oh, I'm losing this debate, let me change to something I know I can win the hearts of my listeners on..."

[dbill27]

I know we think Ron's killing it, but the majority of sean's fans think Ron's striking out right now on foreign policy

[jrice]

Woodrow Wilson hahah BAM!

Awesome

[cdc482]

How the hell can you compare a couple hundred extremist Muslims with no army, country, or goal of world domination to Nazis!?!?!

[Lucille]

Ron already acknowledged the irrationality of the Islamicists! Hannity is completely ignoring his argument about what motivates others to join them.

[Lucille]

Hehehehe.... Woodrow Wilson.

[TNforPaul45]

Uh oh...this interview is going south fast.

[dbill27]

Hannity endorses Wilson!! New Headline!

[johnrocks]

lol, he just pwned Hannity on Woodrow Wilson,roflmao.

[IndianaPolitico]

Oh yeah! Ron just asked Sean, "Is Woodrow Wilson a hero of yours?" Poor Sean, Ron is running circles around him!

[cdc482]

"every so kind to Muslims?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"

[iamse7en]

Yes. Albright. Perfect, Ron.

[Bruno]

Keep breaking it down for those not listening. Thanks!!

[TNforPaul45]

"I gotta run! I gotta run!"

[JCLibertarian]

I'd go for an open boarders guy. Maybe one day you'll meet someone whose lived here for 20+ years, has a family, 2 girls, and a house. According to his boss, he has been one of the best workers at his job for over 20 years. He got picked up by immigration. His crime: being born in a poor country and working to make a living. That happened to a guy I know this morning.

But he took our der. Those jobs belong uus. Only a liberal would believe in right of contract and giving a business the right to hire who they want. This is americuh god-damnit, and these illegals threaten the free market by threatening the solvency of the welfare state.

[TNforPaul45]

And we just lost Sean lol

[sailingaway]

I know we think Ron's killing it, but the majority of sean's fans think Ron's striking out right now on foreign policy

Probably. hannity spent all the time on his TV show with Ron sending out whistles to his base about 'this is why we don't like him, remember'? He doesn't have to say all the things he said so many times before.

[Rothbardian Girl]

I hope someone is recording this. :D

[cdc482]

Never wanted Sean.

[low preference guy]

It was just one topic: blowback

[Sola_Fide]

Oh yeah! Ron just asked Sean, "Is Woodrow Wilson a hero of yours?" Poor Sean, Ron is running circles around him!

Pwnt

[sailingaway]

If I use the word 'geopolitical' do I get to 'win' too?

I think Ron didn't make the cut to the tv show.... if that was a screening....

Ron wants to reach Hannity's listeners, but Hannity isn't the same interviewer with Ron that he is with other Republicans.

[Lucille]

Hannity admits al Qaeda declared war on us, but totally ignored their reasons. Not once did they say they hate us for our freedoms.

The 14th anniversary of a war we refuse to understand (http://non-intervention.com/556/the-14th-anniversary-of-a-war-we-refuse-to-understand/)

I don't want to take the last word but....I'm going to take the last word.

[iamse7en]

Ron did a great job. Bravo, Dr. Paul. We love you!

[IndianaPolitico]

"I've got to run!" It doesn't suprise me Sean..... Everytime you begin to lose the argument, you change the subject, or just plain stop the interview.

[pacelli]

It was just one topic: blowback

Yep. Could have saved everyone about 4 hours worth of waiting around by saying they'd be arguing about blowback.

I hope Ron's 2012 campaign doesn't focus on arguing about blowback.

[JK/SEA]

Well Sean, hows it feel to run into a buzz saw?...lol

[Aldanga]

I believe that the way Ron framed the debate and presented his ideas will make those open to the philosophy of liberty start to question their current views. It was things like this that eventually brought me over.

B+ to Hannity. A to Ron.

[JCLibertarian]

How the hell can you compare a couple hundred extremist Muslims with no army, country, or goal of world domination to Nazis!?!?!

Because neither wanted to nor were capable of taking over America.

[TNforPaul45]

Ron did a great job, but he needs to be more careful about his vocalizations and "groans" when he hears something that he disagrees with. He comes off, to the average listening, sounding a bit snide and cocky. We know he's right, but when people go on the emotional defensive, they will often stand up for something that is wrong in order to seek out the feeling of being right.

[zacharyrow]

Ron is getting better :]

[sailingaway]

Fox is running the debate on May 5. I suspect this interview is going to color the questions.

[trey4sports]

I thought it was a sign that Sean is really really scared of us. He feels the tides shifting

[Romulus]

yes he knows we are growing and here to stay.. we might be 'their' only chance to stop obama (gasp!)

Ha that was great.. 'gotta run'

[TXcarlosTX]

The change in tone from neo-conservative radio host is shocking. The Ron Paul Revolution is changing minds one listener at a time.

[Sola_Fide]

Fox is running the debate on May 5. I suspect this interview is going to color the questions.

You know it will.

[iamse7en]

So, if going into Libya is bad policy, and could backfire, causing harm to America and her troops... Sean, are you blaming America? You unpatriotic bastard!

[Agorism]

Hannity always attacks at what he perceives as the person's weakest point in this case foreign policy.

[Lucille]

Is anyone still listening? I closed it but I have no doubt the screeners will let every negative call though that comes in.

[specsaregood]

im listening cuz i have a feeling he is gonna talk smack.

[Occam's Banana]

Keep breaking it down for those not listening. Thanks!!

Yes, thanks!

The only thing better than listening to a Ron Paul interview is ...

... NOT having to listen to Ron Paul being interviewed by a blowhard like Hannity!
(because you can follow the blow-by-blow on RPFs) :D

[zacharyrow]

I know the calls will be bad, but I'm listening anyways.

[Lucille]

I opened it back up. I must be a masochist.

[Sola_Fide]

We should do a Hannityforum bomb right now.

[ssantoro]

Hannity has been taken down. I bet he spent all week thinking he could win a debate with RP. He became annoyed at the end when he finaly realized he had been taken to the wood shed.

[dbill27]

We should do a Hannityforum bomb right now.


Hannity has a forum?

[Anti Federalist]

And we just lost Sean lol

We never, ever, ever "had" Shamity.

[Cowlesy]

I thought the interview was fine. Sean has always been a neoconservative on foreign policy. He only sees us "saving" people, he will never see those we kill (who he likely thinks deserved it).

He could have been a total assbag, but he was very civil.

Coulda been worse.

[sailingaway]

I thought the interview was fine. Sean has always been a neoconservative on foreign policy. He only sees us "saving" people, he will never see those we kill (who he likely thinks deserved it).

He could have been a total assbag, but he was very civil.

Coulda been worse.

Yeah, but they host the first debate.

[Fermli]

Ron must have referenced 5+ historical examples while Hannity used zero.

Well done Ron!

[thedude]

I thought the interview was fine. Sean has always been a neoconservative on foreign policy. He only sees us "saving" people, he will never see those we kill (who he likely thinks deserved it).

He could have been a total assbag, but he was very civil.

Coulda been worse.

Agreed... I think that is main difference that separates us from folks like hannity. we see unnecessary death, provocation, and wasted money... they see saving lives.

[Sola_Fide]

Hannity has a forum?

If you ever want to get a few minutes of fun, go there.

[specsaregood]

We never, ever, ever "had" Shamity.

And we can never get Mr. 9/11. The guy who's radio show premiered nationwide on 9/10 and has literally made his career off of 9/11 and the WOT.

[specsaregood]

If you ever want to get a few minutes of fun, go there.

Back in 2007 they burned ron paul supporters at the stake on that forum. The head mod was absolutely slanderous to Dr. Paul.

[dbill27]

First caller likeS RON!!

[Lucille]

Wow. A positive call about Paul. He must have slipped in under the radar.

[Cowlesy]

Who is the guy talking now? What a fruitball.

[specsaregood]

NICE!! the first caller, "I really like the guy Ron Paul you had on, I wouldn't mind seeing him as President. I think he would get to the truth on a lot of issues like the Federal Reserve."

[specsaregood]

LOL, Hannity hung up on the guy as soon as he said, "Council on Foreign Relations". lol

[stefank]

he just cut the first caller off

[SWATH]

What the heck I heard "Council on Foreign Relations" and the call was immediately dropped and the next caller was already talking.

What was he saying about the CFR I kind of tuned out for second?

[specsaregood]

What the heck I heard "Council on Foreign Relations" and the call was immediately dropped and the next caller was already talking.

Yeah, they must have not been prepared with the delay button. lol A truth virus cell slipped through.

[Anti Federalist]

Back in 2007 they burned ron paul supporters at the stake on that forum. The head mod was absolutely slanderous to Dr. Paul.

Ask Johnrocks, he has a gazillion posts over there.

Lee Kington was the head mod, he's been there forever and still there I think.

<<<proudly banned numerous times

[ClayTrainor]

lol, I just came in at the tail end of that.

Hannity: "How about I just tell the truth"

Ron Paul: "when?"

Hannity: "All the time"

Ron paul: "Hahahahahah"

Hannity: "Okay, I gotta let you go, You're a waste of my time"

Edit: Ron Paul didn't say that, apparently it was someone trolling hannity. My bad.

[Lucille]

yeah, they must have not been prepared with the delay button. Lol a truth virus cell slipped through.

lol...

[Anti Federalist]

And we can never get Mr. 9/11. The guy who's radio show premiered nationwide on 9/10 and has literally made his career off of 9/11 and the WOT.

That's right it did, I had completly forgotten about that.

[Wren]

lol, I just came in at the tail end of that.

Hannity: "How about I just tell the truth"

Ron Paul: "when?"

Hannity: "All the time"

Ron paul: "Hahahahahah"

Hannity: "Okay, I gotta let you go, You're a waste of my time"

Dude, that wasn't RP lmao. That was a liberal guy calling in to troll hannity :p

[Anti Federalist]

lol, I just came in at the tail end of that.

Hannity: "How about I just tell the truth"

Ron Paul: "when?"

Hannity: "All the time"

Ron paul: "Hahahahahah"

Hannity: "Okay, I gotta let you go, You're a waste of my time"

Did he really say that?

That's worth an iceball if he did.

ETA - NVM

[ClayTrainor]

Dude, that wasn't RP lmao. That was a liberal guy calling in to troll hannity :p

Really? lol. Well, he sounded just like RP. My bad, lol.

[JCF]

I don't think it's beneficial for Hannity to have anti-Paul callers to call in, because in will eventually lead to Hannity being a defender of Paul, whereas when a pro-paul guy calls in he can ALWAYS go on the offensive against Paul. Hannity always plays the defender of republicans, and I always hear his listeners parrot the same crap he does the same exact way.

The subconscious mind of the listener picks up this defensive/offensive mentality... If he always plays offensive against Paul, so will the listeners, if he always defends republicans, so will the listeners (as many of them tend to do).

[Lucille]

I had to turn it off. I feel dumber just listening to Hannity.

[daviddee]

...

[FortisKID]

Its on youtube :P


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHMZJYIpu60

[Kregisen]

3. That our military has not been in any worthwhile battle... since the American revolution.


WWII wasn't?????

[Lucille]

Let's send Sean one of these:

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSNgxjNgQih83x7rdknhpTErJCwtRkjf lRxFW_VKb4or5Xjn6ot

From,
The snowball-wielding Paulians.

[ClayTrainor]

WWII wasn't?????


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke2hloDrb1c

[Cutlerzzz]

WWII wasn't?????
While the German and Japanese governments were evil, the United States did not need to get involved. US intervention in WWI played a large role in the creation of Nazi Germany, while much earlier intervention in Japan played a role in creating Imperial Japan. Furthermore, the United States was involved in the war before Pearl Harbor. The US placed crippling sanctions on Japan to try and force them to end their war in China(ironically, it would have been in Japan's best interest to have stopped their aggression), was already fighting a Naval War with Germany, and was supplying Britain and China. Pearl Harbor was a classic example of blowback, though that is not to say that Japan was not wrong in what they did.

Then if you look at the aftermath, with 1/3rd of the worlds population living under communism not long after the war was over, much of the rest of the world in chaos, and US forces stationed around the world for the next 65 years, I would say that the United States was not better off and the world may not have been either.

[Acala]

WWII wasn't?????

You mean the war to make the world safe for Soviet and Maoist communism? That war? The war that resulted in a permanent global deployment of the US military? That one?

[Kregisen]

The US placed crippling sanctions on Japan to try and force them to end their war in China(ironically, it would have been in Japan's best interest to have stopped their aggression), was already fighting a Naval War with Germany, and was supplying Britain and China. Pearl Harbor was a classic example of blowback, though that is not to say that Japan was not wrong in what they did.

Yes I'm well aware of WWII history...the statement I quoted said WWII wasn't a worthwhile battle. Yes it was. I'm not saying we didn't egg on Japan to do something drastic, but once we were attacked, of course it was worthwhile to attack back. Are you seriously saying we should have done nothing after being attacked?


Then if you look at the aftermath, with 1/3rd of the worlds population living under communism not long after the war was over, much of the rest of the world in chaos, and US forces stationed around the world for the next 65 years, I would say that the United States was not better off and the world may not have been either.

Now that's a completely separate issue. Hawaii became a U.S. state in 1959 and then Obama was born there in 1961...if you don't want Obama as president, do you also believe Hawaii shouldn't have become a U.S. state?

[Anti Federalist]

You mean the war to make the world safe for Soviet and Maoist communism? That war? The war that resulted in a permanent global deployment of the US military? That one?

Not to mention the tens, possibly hundreds, of millions of war dead, many of them non-combatants, both during and after the war.

[Anti Federalist]

Are you seriously saying we should have done nothing after being attacked?

I can't speak for the OP in this sidebar, but I'm not.

All I'm saying is the "inside job" that was Pearl Harbor did just what it was supposed to do.

It made us respond in the only way possible, a full, land, air and naval war on two fronts.

Which was the goal all along.

[JCLibertarian]

Pearl Harbor was a classic example of blowback, though that is not to say that Japan was not wrong in what they did.



Yea, Japan is evil for attacking a US Government Naval base, I mean, it isn't like US Government weapons weren't already killing Japanese Government troops or something:rolleyes:. Totally unprovoked.

[specsaregood]

Is everybody in agreement that we are seeing a different Dr. Paul this time? Much more willing to throw some punches?

[Cutlerzzz]

Yes I'm well aware of WWII history...the statement I quoted said WWII wasn't a worthwhile battle. Yes it was. I'm not saying we didn't egg on Japan to do something drastic, but once we were attacked, of course it was worthwhile to attack back. Are you seriously saying we should have done nothing after being attacked?

If you want to start history on December 7th 1941, then it was entirely justified. But history has been going on for much longer. WWII only happened because the United States did not follow a non interventionist foreign policy.


Now that's a completely separate issue. Hawaii became a U.S. state in 1959 and then Obama was born there in 1961...if you don't want Obama as president, do you also believe Hawaii shouldn't have become a U.S. state
I'm saying that the United States did not need to supply the Soviet Union and other despotic regimes to win the war once the United States became(unfortunately) involved. Had the US not done that the Iron Curtain is not taking half of Europe with it. To ignore and the cause and effect of a war and only look at it from December 7th 1941-August 15th 1945 is silly.

[georgiaboy]

!Thread of the Day Award!

[JCLibertarian]

Yes I'm well aware of WWII history...the statement I quoted said WWII wasn't a worthwhile battle. Yes it was. I'm not saying we didn't egg on Japan to do something drastic, but once we were attacked, of course it was worthwhile to attack back. Are you seriously saying we should have done nothing after being attacked?



Now that's a completely separate issue. Hawaii became a U.S. state in 1959 and then Obama was born there in 1961...if you don't want Obama as president, do you also believe Hawaii shouldn't have become a U.S. state?
Well first, stop using we, you weren't their, so stop acting like you were attacked. Secondly, I love your enthusiasm for war, though I doubt you would have shared it if you were forcefully conscripted into it and had to fight it yourself. Third, if it was such a worthwhile cause, Americans wouldn't have had to had been enslaved to fight it; if people viewed it as a threat to their security or to the security of those they care about, they would go on their own. It is pretty audacious and un-libertarian to commit others against their will to your fights. What America should have done is addressed why the underlying causes of why the Japanese attack happened and corrected them.

[low preference guy]

Is everybody in agreement that we are seeing a different Dr. Paul this time? Much more willing to throw some punches?

absolutely. i was surprised at how aggressive he was in his interview with cenk yesterday.

[Cutlerzzz]

Yea, Japan is evil for attacking a US Government Naval base, I mean, it isn't like US Government weapons weren't already killing Japanese Government troops or something:rolleyes:. Totally unprovoked.
So I guess that the Chinese were not justified in defending themselves against their Japanese liberators. :rolleyes:

Let's take a look at what Pearl Harbor brought Japan: 3 million dead, the complete destruction of their country, and foreign occupation to this day. I would say that Japan would have been much better off ending their warmongering and adopting a non interventionist foreign policy. Having other countries put sanctions against Japan and supply their enemies was blowback. I would hope that you agree with this, and are not arguing that Japan was ever right at any point in time during WWII.

[specsaregood]

absolutely. i was surprised at how aggressive he was in his interview with cenk yesterday.

exactly, he called cenk out for misleading, linked hannity with woodrow wilson and told spitzer that he represented the status quo.
He is calling em out from the get-go. I think this is what people want to see/hear.

[low preference guy]

exactly, he called cenk out for misleading, linked hannity with woodrow wilson and told spitzer that he represented the status quo.
He is calling em out from the get-go. I think this is what people want to see/hear.

it's like he is letting his "Rand Paul" side come out.

[Aldanga]

I'd say he's revived the passion of his youth.

[The Dark Knight]

the More the Neo Cons keep pushing for war, the more popular our movement becomes! 70% of Americans want us out of the wars! The republicans will not win back the presidency until they return to a sensible foreign policy

[TheBlackPeterSchiff]

haha, Sean Hannity got murked!!

[JCLibertarian]

So I guess that the Chinese were not justified in defending themselves against their Japanese liberators. :rolleyes:

Let's take a look at what Pearl Harbor brought Japan: 3 million dead, the complete destruction of their country, and foreign occupation to this day. I would say that Japan would have been much better off ending their warmongering and adopting a non interventionist foreign policy. Having other countries put sanctions against Japan and supply their enemies was blowback. I would hope that you agree with this, and are not arguing that Japan was ever right at any point in time during WWII.

I never said that, but that is totally different than forcing American citizens through extortion of their wealth to finance the purchasing of weapons to be given to the Chinese to kill Japanese military. America indirectly killed Japanese first, and the Japanese responded by attacking American Military targets. You are distracting from this matter of fact statement.

I don't believe any country was objectively "right", but the notion that Japan attacked unprovoked or that the American Government didn't finance the killing of Japanese Military before they attacked US Military targets is absurd.

[Sola_Fide]

Is everybody in agreement that we are seeing a different Dr. Paul this time? Much more willing to throw some punches?

I like it. It tells me Ron understands the signs of our times.

[S.Shorland]

I wasn't around last time but as a foreigner,I get an overwhelming sense that a potential American President needs to be an alpha male who says how it is and how it's going to be.Sean Hannity was tentatively asking Ron to 'come on over to our side' but he stated his position well and in fact I think he should arrange a private meeting with Hannity to see if there is any closer meeting of minds possible,

[KramerDSP]

exactly, he called cenk out for misleading, linked hannity with woodrow wilson and told spitzer that he represented the status quo.
He is calling em out from the get-go. I think this is what people want to see/hear.

Amen! People are tired of politicians that sing and dance and spew words like the pied piper. RP is calling everybody out and he has nothing to lose.

[Chieppa1]

Ron Paul is winning independents, that's what he's doing. The young people my age that voted for Obama because they hated Bush AND FOXNews. NOT because they liked Obama. Sure, he was cool and African American, but they just hated Bush. Ron making fun of the establishment hacks will work with a crowd. And the best thing we can hope for is "the same old tricks" because Ron is ready this time is sounds/looks like.

[S.Shorland]

I have a strong feeling that we/you are pushing China very hard in the Meditterranean.They had 50 large business deals and 30,000 men there,29,000 of which had to be evacuated.Gaddhafi was the only leader who wouldn't join America's 'africa command' or africom.I think that China's backstop of Spain is their retaliation.The Euro might have been likely to collapse before the Dollar but China are going to spend as much as it takes to make sure the Dollar cracks first.

[sailingaway]

Sean Hannity was tentatively asking Ron to 'come on over to our side' I agree, and were Ron willing to 'give a little' and tone down on the foreign policy change activism, I think Fox might have gone one way down the potential unity GOP trail, and now might be thinking of another course of action.

Ron is who he is, though.

[sailingaway]

Ron Paul is winning independents, that's what he's doing. The young people my age that voted for Obama because they hated Bush AND FOXNews. NOT because they liked Obama. Sure, he was cool and African American, but they just hated Bush. Ron making fun of the establishment hacks will work with a crowd. And the best thing we can hope for is "the same old tricks" because Ron is ready this time is sounds/looks like.

I sure hope they are willing to register GOP, because by the time the general election comes around the die will be cast.

[specsaregood]

I agree, and were Ron willing to 'give a little' and tone down on the foreign policy change activism, I think Fox might have gone one way down the potential unity GOP trail, and now might be thinking of another course of action.

Ron is who he is, though.

And if he had "gave a little" his own supporters would have ate him alive and Fox would have taken it as a weakness and attacked him even harder. Dr. Paul, linking Hannity to woodrow wilson was brilliant as it makes it hard for them to attack him further on it. Especially after Beck did those big Anti-Woodrow-wilson segments.

[sailingaway]

it's like he is letting his "Rand Paul" side come out.

No, he wasn't snarky, he was calling Cenk to task for irresponsibly stirring up division in time of crises, and pointing out a flaw in Spitzer's position, not calling him on using prostitutes.

I love Rand, but they are different people.

[Brett85]

3. That our military has not been in any worthwhile battle... since the American revolution.

WWII and the original war in Afghanistan? We were attacked in both situations.

[Cutlerzzz]

I never said that, but that is totally different than forcing American citizens through extortion of their wealth to finance the purchasing of weapons to be given to the Chinese to kill Japanese military. America indirectly killed Japanese first, and the Japanese responded by attacking American Military targets. You are distracting from this matter of fact statement.

I don't believe any country was objectively "right", but the notion that Japan attacked unprovoked or that the American Government didn't finance the killing of Japanese Military before they attacked US Military targets is absurd.

Some say that the Iranians have given supplies to insurgents in Iraq. If this is the case, does that mean that the United States would be justified in attacking Iran? No, of course not, as the United States is not justified to be in Iraq. Japan would only be right to attack the United States, in this case, if their war with China was justified, which is was not. Three wrongs do not make a right. Pearl Harbor was wrong, just as Japan was wrong in their war in China and the United States was wrong to get involved. Civilians died during Pearl Harbor BTW, which is to be expected given that it was a suprise attack.

Nobody put fourth the notion that Pearl Harbor was unprovoked. In my first post I clearly state that Pearl Harbor was caused by blowback.

[sailingaway]

And if he had "gave a little" his own supporters would have ate him alive and Fox would have taken it as a weakness and attacked him even harder. Dr. Paul, linking Hannity to woodrow wilson was brilliant as it makes it hard for them to attack him further on it. Especially after Beck did those big Anti-Woodrow-wilson segments.

Did you take from what I wrote that I thought he should have given ground to Hannity?

I must have seriously misspoken.

I think Hannity went away with a greater respect, but a more firm disagreement.

I DO think Ron needs to drop the 'one world government' buzzword. We know what he means but it sounds better when he says internationalism and violation of individual country sovreignity imho. I think he has been coached to use it because he didn't used to. I wonder if it is a buzz word Beck used or something?

[specsaregood]

Did you take from what I wrote that I thought he should have given ground to Hannity?
I must have seriously misspoken.


No and you didn't. I was just expounding upon what you said.

I do disagree that if he had gave a little that they would "think Fox might have gone one way down the potential unity GOP trail".
I think they would have taken it as a weakness instead and used it to attack him.

[sailingaway]

could be. I'm just the sort of person who second guesses everything. Useless, really.

[low preference guy]

I do disagree that if he had gave a little that they would "think Fox might have gone one way down the potential unity GOP trail".
I think they would have taken it as a weakness instead and used it to attack him.

agree

[Kregisen]

If you want to start history on December 7th 1941, then it was entirely justified. But history has been going on for much longer. WWII only happened because the United States did not follow a non interventionist foreign policy.

Exactly my point. We can all agree that the U.S. was meddling in other nation's business which created big tensions and resulted in WWII, but again, the person who I responded to said WWII was not worthwhile. Yes it was. Because in the end, no matter who's fault or provoking it was, we were attacked and declared war upon. At that point you don't have a choice but to go to war, then hopefully end it fast and bring your troops home.



I'm saying that the United States did not need to supply the Soviet Union and other despotic regimes to win the war once the United States became(unfortunately) involved. Had the US not done that the Iron Curtain is not taking half of Europe with it. To ignore and the cause and effect of a war and only look at it from December 7th 1941-August 15th 1945 is silly.

Of course, when did I ever say we should have supplied the soviet union? We have to look at it from december 7th 1941 because at that point in time we had a choice to make, either go to war with japan or not after we were attacked.

[Bruno]

Just listened to the two hour delay. Ron kicked Hannity's ass!!! Lmao!

[LisaNY]

way to keep your head in the sand Hannity!

He can't grasp the concept of blowback because he's too stupid to think critically.

If our policies have nothing to do with inciting terrorism, then why aren't they committing jihad in places like china and canada?

[civusamericanus]

In Hannity-speak, this tube needs to be the antithesis of all other tubes and must be posted with great specificity!
Haha... I was just laughing with my brother about Hannity Speak.

[sailingaway]

Exactly my point. We can all agree that the U.S. was meddling in other nation's business which created big tensions and resulted in WWII, but again, the person who I responded to said WWII was not worthwhile. Yes it was. Because in the end, no matter who's fault or provoking it was, we were attacked and declared war upon. At that point you don't have a choice but to go to war, then hopefully end it fast and bring your troops home.


Of course, when did I ever say we should have supplied the soviet union? We have to look at it from december 7th 1941 because at that point in time we had a choice to make, either go to war with japan or not after we were attacked.

I agree. It isn't like all other nations of the world WERE being noninterventionist or anything. It would be hard to unravel who went first. When you are attacked, though, you go to war.

When you AREN'T......

[Cutlerzzz]

Exactly my point. We can all agree that the U.S. was meddling in other nation's business which created big tensions and resulted in WWII, but again, the person who I responded to said WWII was not worthwhile. Yes it was. Because in the end, no matter who's fault or provoking it was, we were attacked and declared war upon. At that point you don't have a choice but to go to war, then hopefully end it fast and bring your troops home.




Of course, when did I ever say we should have supplied the soviet union? We have to look at it from december 7th 1941 because at that point in time we had a choice to make, either go to war with japan or not after we were attacked.

Well I would agree that after Japan declares war on the US that the United States does not have a choice but to declare back, lol. They could not just stand there and do nothing when they being being shot at.

[Kregisen]

Well first, stop using we, you weren't their, so stop acting like you were attacked.

lol let's be mature here.


Secondly, I love your enthusiasm for war, though I doubt you would have shared it if you were forcefully conscripted into it and had to fight it yourself. Third, if it was such a worthwhile cause, Americans wouldn't have had to had been enslaved to fight it; if people viewed it as a threat to their security or to the security of those they care about, they would go on their own. It is pretty audacious and un-libertarian to commit others against their will to your fights. What America should have done is addressed why the underlying causes of why the Japanese attack happened and corrected them.

lol now you're changing the topic to whether or not we should have a draft. If you want to argue whether or not we should have gone to war with Japan after they attacked us, then do it, but don't quote my posts and completely change the topic, when there are other people I could be replying to.

[civusamericanus]

Here's the radio show from today!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dHKJBlrtmk

[Kregisen]

Well I would agree that after Japan declares war on the US that the United States does not have a choice but to declare back, lol. They could not just stand there and do nothing when they being being shot at.

That's my point. But there's 1 or 2 people in this very thread who disagree lol. This whole thing started when I quoted someone who said the U.S. getting into WWII was not worthwhile.

[sailingaway]

Thing is, Hannity used up all Ron's time discussing the ONE topic his listeners would object to rather than the many topics where Ron has desperately needed solutions his listeners need to hear.

[Sola_Fide]

Thing is, Hannity used up all Ron's time discussing the ONE topic his listeners would object to rather than the many topics where Ron has desperately needed solutions his listeners need to hear.

Exactly. I am not sure if this is good or bad though.

[Bruno]

Hannity: "I agree with 95% of your views so I am going to focus 100% of our time on the other 5%". What a dumbass.

[TortoiseDream]

Hannity is so obsessed with that snowball fight. Facking doochebag.

[Working Poor]

it wasn't so bad to me...

[Kregisen]

I think Ron did extremely well, but like others have said, I wish Hannity would talk more about other issues instead of just foreign policy. It's like interviewing Trump and only talking about universal healthcare or like interviewing Huckabee and only talking about immigration, or interviewing Romney and only talking about Romneycare, gun bans, his flip-flops on abortion, TARP bailout--- oh wait, Romney is a liberal on almost every issue.

[sailingaway]

^^lol!

[tpreitzel]

Sean, so people are born to hate, eh? Can one imagine Sean's vision of hating babies? LoL! Look out world, we have hating babies who'll grow up and spread their hate by dominating the world. Preventing that possibility somehow gives the US the right to kill the hating babies to prevent them from carrying out their diabolical plans of domination. The light never dawns on Sean (Shawn) that external forces mold babies into hating men, e.g. the reckless actions of foreign invaders.... Look out, Sean, Sharia is out to get you wherever you are even while you sleep. You might even have to grow a beard...

[WilliamC]

Simply put, Sean Hannity and his ilk base their foreign policy on fear.

Ron Paul and his ilk base theirs on freedom.

[ItsTime]

Simply put, Sean Hannity and his ilk base their foreign policy on fear.

Ron Paul and his ilk base theirs on freedom.

+1

[Johnnymac]

mmmm, i listened to the first 10 seconds and im already pissed, he keeps bashing ron about the snowballs grrrrrr ..... oh i didnt do anything to you...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh2sBKpLxpQ you did you asshole

[tpreitzel]

Ron tried to expose some of Sean's abnormal fear of Muslims by accurately stating that ALL groups of people contain radical members, but Sean obviously needs a psychiatrist to strip away his paranoia over Shariah.

[Johnnymac]

i hate when he goes ... okay you host the show... like as if guests are not supposed make smart rebuttles and ask questions fucking asshole

[sailingaway]

Ron tried to expose some of Sean's abnormal fear of Muslims by accurately stating that ALL groups of people contain radical members, but Sean obviously needs a psychiatrist to strip away his paranoia over Shariah.

fear of Muslims, nothing, that guy needs help with his irrational fear of snowballs...

[pacelli]

Ron tried to expose some of Sean's abnormal fear of Muslims by accurately stating that ALL groups of people contain radical members, but Sean obviously needs a psychiatrist to strip away his paranoia over Shariah.

Honestly, Hannity is beyond help from even our profession.