PDA

View Full Version : Are neocons blackmailing Obama?




doodle
04-20-2011, 11:02 AM
Are neocon/war lobbies blackmailing Obama?

Why suddenly now Birther book is top headline now on Drudge and a high profile neocon allied candidate has made birther issue central piece of his campaign with media giving it lot of coverage?

Obama is not exactly cutting down wars, unless it is to pressure him against supporting Palestinian State that is supposed to be created by Sept 11. Drudge has interesting history, his web site was put on the map with headline feature of Monica Lewinsky scandal just when it seemed that Clinton was getting close to brokering a mideast peace deal between Rabin ( who was murdered later by an Israeli extremist) and Arafat.



Facts about Monica Lewinsky: “Drudge Report”, as discussed in Matt ...
Facts about Monica Lewinsky: “Drudge Report”, In early 1998 Drudge's name became a household word. By January Newsweek had prepared an article on Bill ...
http://www.britannica.com/facts/5/1039707/Monica-Lewinsky-as-discussed-in-Matt-Drudge-American-journalist

Matt Drudge: world's most powerful journalist - Telegraph
telegraph.co.uk
Feb 28, 2008 ... Matt Drudge is arguably the single most powerful journalist in the world ... presidency by breaking news of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1580164/Matt-Drudge-worlds-most-powerful-journalist.html


"most powerful " is over hype, more like widely read sensationalist internet gossip "journalist".

FrankRep
04-20-2011, 11:05 AM
More Proof, Less Speculation please.

Krugerrand
04-20-2011, 11:06 AM
Personally, I think it's because the puppet masters have decided that their puppet won't get re-elected. So, they're setting up a scenario under which a Democratic challenger can come in an take the nomination for 2012.

sorry FR - I can offer no proof .... it's pure speculation on my part.

FrankRep
04-20-2011, 11:15 AM
Time to "throw the rascals out" and elect new rascals.




The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.

- Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/tragedy-and-hope.html) (1966)

specsaregood
04-20-2011, 11:19 AM
The author of said book isn't pro-war or a neocon.

doodle
04-20-2011, 11:25 AM
More Proof, Less Speculation please.

It's a question raised based on circumstantial events.

This "birther" stuff has been around since before Obama became President, media was dismissing them as "kooky" conspiracy theories, Suddenly MSM & neocon/democratic linked news sites are treating as a legitimate story going softball on Trump and it being given new life. Did anything change suddenly?


Buchanan calls out own network for promoting birther issue

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/19/buchanan-calls-out-own-network-for-promoting-birther-issue-msnbc-is-transfixed-with-it/#ixzz1K5NFNQI4

Cowlesy
04-20-2011, 11:29 AM
The author of said book isn't pro-war or a neocon.

Agree, although, not really against foreign intervention from what I can tell.

FrankRep
04-20-2011, 11:36 AM
Agree, although, not really against foreign intervention from what I can tell.

Not a Neocon.


Dr. Jerome Corsi and Ron Paul both endorsed Chuck Baldwin, of the Constitution Party, for President.


Dr. Jerome Corsi Endorsed Chuck Baldwin ON Larry King Live!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K27vCwSdJo

Ron Paul Endorses Chuck Baldwin for President
http://www.ronpaul.com/2008-09-23/ron-paul-endorses-chuck-baldwin-for-president/

Krugerrand
04-20-2011, 11:38 AM
This was my 2012 prediction:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?282907-Your-2012-predictions

Ron Paul takes a huge lead in the GOP primary. As RP's victory becomes obvious, the DEMs realize that Obama will lose against Ron Paul. Suddenly new and indisputable evidence pops up out of nowhere that Obama is ineligible to be president. Biden rides out the term after Obama's resignation. Howard Dean crawls out of the woodwork as the leading DEM candidate and wins the DEM primary.

Ron Paul takes on John Mackey as his running mate and they defeat a Dean-Clinton ticket by a landslide.

I see a very real possibility that Obama will be declared un-re-electable by the Democratic Party and a new puppet lined up to take his place.

doodle
04-20-2011, 11:40 AM
The author of said book isn't pro-war or a neocon.

Well the author didn't make his book a top feature on a high traffic political gossip site like Drudge. Just like Trump didn't force media to give his claims lot of coverage without challanging shaky claims as they used to before election.

sofia
04-20-2011, 02:08 PM
OP has cracked the code!

The B.C. issue is definitely a neo-con operation...just like the Lewisnky blow job was.

There are two factions of the NWO....one The Bildeberger-Soros faction, is more concerned with World Government....and the other - the Zionist factions,,,is most concerned with Israel dominating the Middle East.

This is an internal mob war.....and the Neo-Cons wont quit until Obama (or a successor) invades Syria and Iran and allows Israel to start conquering.

FrankRep
04-20-2011, 02:29 PM
OP has cracked the code!

The B.C. issue is definitely a neo-con operation..

Show me some proof first.

BTW, Dr. Jerome Corsi (author) is not a Neocon.

acptulsa
04-20-2011, 02:48 PM
I still favor the notion that Trump is there to split the anti-Obama vote. Why else would he announce an independent run in the general election before he even tries to get the nomination? Why would we need a less simple, rational, and elegant solution to the puzzle?

anaconda
04-20-2011, 04:26 PM
Personally, I think it's because the puppet masters have decided that their puppet won't get re-elected. So, they're setting up a scenario under which a Democratic challenger can come in an take the nomination for 2012.

sorry FR - I can offer no proof .... it's pure speculation on my part.

I have often thought that Obama might pull an LBJ and say something to the effect of: "For the good of the country that I love and honor, and in the interests of coming together and moving forward, I have decided to not seek, nor shall I accept, your nomination as President for a second term." Or something like that. If the polls justify this by around May or June then I think it is certainly possible.