PDA

View Full Version : First credit crunch traced back to Roman republic




Marenco
04-10-2011, 02:31 AM
An old but interesting article.

''The budget should be balanced, the treasury refilled, public debt reduced, the arrogance of officialdom tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands curtailed, lest Rome become bankrupt.''

– Cicero, Roman statesman


Politicians searching for historical precedents for the current financial turmoil should start looking a bit further back after an Oxford University historian discovered what he believes is the world's first credit crunch in 88BC.

The good news is that Philip Kay knows how the Romans got themselves into financial bother. The bad news is no one knows how they got themselves out of it.

"The essential similarity between what happened 21 centuries ago and what is happening in today's UK economy is that a massive increase in monetary liquidity culminated with problems in another country causing a credit crisis at home. In both cases distance and over-optimism obscured the risk," said Kay, a supernumerary fellow at Wolfson College.

The monetary historian is giving a lecture today in which he will reveal how Cicero, the Roman orator, gave a speech in 66BC in which he alluded to the credit crunch. Cicero was arguing that Pompey the Great should be given military command against Mithridates VI, king of Pontus on the Black sea coast of what is now Turkey. He reminded his audience of events in 88BC, when the same Mithridates invaded the Roman province of Asia, on the western coast of Turkey. Cicero claimed the invasion caused the loss of so much Roman money that credit was destroyed in Rome itself.

The orator told his audience: "Defend the republic from this danger and believe me when I tell you - what you see for yourselves - that this system of monies, which operates at Rome in the Forum, is bound up in, and is linked with, those Asian monies; the loss of one inevitably undermines the other and causes its collapse."

Kay said the words were "remarkable" for their contemporary tone. "Substitute US sub-prime for 'the Asian monies' and the UK banking system for 'the system of monies which operates in the Roman Forum' and it could have been written about the current credit crisis," said Kay.

"In second-century and early first-century BC Rome, increased inflows of bullion combined with an expansion in the availability of credit to produce a massive growth in Rome's money supply. This increase in the supply and availability of money in turn resulted both in a major increase in Roman economic activity and, eventually, in the credit crisis which Cicero describes."

So how did they get themselves out of such a pickle? "There's very little information about what happened over the next 20 years I'm afraid," said Kay. "We just don't know."

Certainly historians know that Sulla became dictator of the Roman republic after the credit crunch, but Kay said the two events were unrelated.

Kay, who has a background in investment banking and fund management, will deliver his lecture in Oxford. The lecture is organised by the Oxford Roman Economy Project.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/28/credit-crunch-roman-republic-lecture

acptulsa
04-10-2011, 05:23 AM
Bread, circuses and Roman Exceptionalism.

Icymudpuppy
04-10-2011, 10:34 AM
They had a financial collapse.

The first triumvirate of Pompey, Crassus, and Julius Caeser and the second triumvirate of Antony, Lepidus, and Octavius directed the Republic toward a dictatorial empire in the intervening years.

Augustus (Octavius) Caesar became the first absolute monarch in Roman history in 27BC.

Icymudpuppy
04-10-2011, 10:38 AM
Bread, circuses and Roman Exceptionalism.

That was much later. At the time of the referenced credit crunch, Rome had not yet secured it's position in the middle east, had not conquered much Germanic and Gaul territory at all, and was in fact spending a lot of money defending it's semi-independent client states on its borders against the barbarian raiders. It also had recently suffered a massive slave revolt in 73-71BC led by Spartacus.

nate895
04-10-2011, 11:10 AM
Augustus (Octavius) Caesar became the first absolute monarch in Roman history in 27BC.

The Roman Emperors did not become true absolute monarchs for centuries thereafter. The emperors still needed at least toleration from the Senate. If the Senate was united against an emperor, that emperor was sure to be removed. It took a lot for that to happen, but it did happen on several occasions.

Lucille
04-10-2011, 02:02 PM
Martin Armstrong is always a great read on history...repeating:

The Third Century Monetary Collapse:
http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/How-ALL-Systems-Can-Collapse-Overnight-709.pdf

Anatomy of a Debt Crisis (That Appears Only Julius Caesar Understood):
http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Anatomy-of-a-Debt-CrisisThat-Appears-Only-Julius-Caesar-Ever-Understood-6309.pdf

More here: http://www.martinarmstrong.org/continued.htm , or here: http://www.scribd.com/kzuur58 , and now that he's out of prison, here: http://armstrongeconomics.com/writings/, his latest: http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Hello%20World%2004-06-2011.pdf

acptulsa
04-10-2011, 02:11 PM
...and now that he's out of prison...

Good news!

Next nadir in confidence is mid-June, by his pi system...

Lucille
04-10-2011, 02:32 PM
Good news!

Next nadir in confidence is mid-June, by his pi system...

I was truly afraid he wouldn't make it out alive! Can't wait for his book.

Gird your loins!


He noted back then that the Sovereign Debt Crisis would appear around 2007.15 and go into 2011.45 (Jun 13-14, 2011 (http://goldandsilverlinings.com/?p=541) which will be an interesting time to watch).

He believes the actual collapse will begin with the peak of the next short term wave in 2015.75 and the worst will be between then and 2020.05.

From his latest: It has been a hard battle just to write. We tend to think that we live in a country that is free and we have all these rights. Nothing could be further from the truth. For you see, they turned the constitution upside down. Instead of you having rights, you have to prove they exist. The government does whatever it damn well pleases whenever. It is your burden to prove you have any rights at all and whatever action they then claim violates the constitution. This is why THEY appoint the judges for they hold the keys to everything.

ETA: Every time he calls for a modern day Cincinnatus to become dictator for a year to fix this mess, the only one I can think of who could be trusted with that kind of power is RP, but the thing is, he would never do it!