PDA

View Full Version : California: Judge Upholds Racial Quotas for Highway Contracts




FrankRep
04-09-2011, 01:00 PM
Obama's Postracial America


California: Judge Upholds Racial Quotas for Highway Contracts (http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/34/3449.asp)
Federal judge approves set asides and racial quotas for transportation contracts in California.


The Newspaper
April 8, 2011


A federal judge last week granted the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) the right to discriminate against white business owners and men when awarding contracts. The Pacific Legal Foundation had filed suit against the department on behalf of the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of San Diego, insisting that its racial quota program violated the voter-approved Proposition 209 prohibition on race- and sex-based preferences in public contracting, employment and education. US District Court Judge John Mendez weighed the arguments, denied the Pacific Legal Foundation's motion and granted summary judgment in favor of Caltrans.

"This decision affirms that Caltrans' efforts to level the playing field are constitutionally sound and will ensure that billions of dollars in federal transportation funds continue flowing to California," Caltrans Director Cindy McKim said in a statement Wednesday. "We will continue to reach out to disadvantaged businesses and hope our program serves as a model for other states to follow."

In March 2009, Caltrans announced it would implement a "mandatory race conscious Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/DBE_CRLC.html)" that set aside 6.75 percent of federal-aid project contracts for blacks, Asians and Indians -- but not Hispanics or "subcontinent Asian males." AGC member companies -- the San Diego chapter represents 1300 firms -- complained that under the program, they lost out on business despite offering higher quality services at better prices. A similar program had been struck down as illegal in 2006, but Caltrans officials worked with the Obama administration looking for a way around the law. The US Department of Transportation issued a letter stating that California would lose federal highway funds if it did not implement a quota system. This triggered an escape clause in Proposition 209 that allows discrimination to avoid losing federal money.
...


Full Story:
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/34/3449.asp

MaxPower
04-09-2011, 01:19 PM
So, once they've filled their quota for a given race, may we expect to see signs that read "whites/blacks/latinos need not apply"?

Stary Hickory
04-09-2011, 01:26 PM
The judge is a racist and ought to be removed. Unacceptable. The Judge is actually ruling that by law it is ok to discriminate against someone on the basis of skin. This judge belongs behind bars.

FrankRep
04-09-2011, 01:31 PM
The Pacific Legal Foundation had filed suit against the department on behalf of the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of San Diego, insisting that its racial quota program violated the voter-approved Proposition 209 prohibition on race- and sex-based preferences in public contracting, employment and education.

California Proposition 209 (1996) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_209_%281996%29)


Proposition 209 (also known as the California Civil Rights Initiative) is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit public institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity.
...

Proposition 209 was voted into law on 5 November 1996, with 54 percent of the votes.

specsaregood
04-09-2011, 01:44 PM
California Proposition 209 (1996) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_209_%281996%29)


Proposition 209 (also known as the California Civil Rights Initiative) is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit public institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity.
Proposition 209 was voted into law on 5 November 1996, with 54 percent of the votes.


Your own OP states:


This triggered an escape clause in Proposition 209 that allows discrimination to avoid losing federal money.

So the voters of california approved discrimination in Prop 209 in that situation.

FrankRep
04-09-2011, 01:56 PM
So the voters of California approved discrimination in Prop 209 in that situation.

How dirty.

Discrimination is prohibited in California, but if the Federal Government gives us money to discriminate, it's Allowed.


California Proposition 209 (1996): (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_209_%281996%29)


(e) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the state.

specsaregood
04-09-2011, 01:59 PM
How dirty.
Discrimination is prohibited in California, but if the Federal Government gives us money to discriminate, it's Allowed.


California Proposition 209 (1996): (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_209_%281996%29)


(e) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the state.

Yup "they" sure do like to have their cake and shove it up our rectums eat it too.