"Paul Ryan is worse than Bill Clinton" [LP]

[Matt Collins]

http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/libertarians-say-paul-ryan-is-worse-than-bill-clinton

[doodle]

Yes

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?276616-Notorious-neocon-Paul-Ryan-pushed-to-be-new-Republican-quot-star-quot-LOL&p=3077694&viewfull=1#post3077694

At least Clinton was less deceptive.

[BuddyRey]

Something about Paul Ryan just rubs me the wrong way. I always pick up this incredibly unpleasant vibe from him, as though he's going out of his way to put on a sympathetic, doe-eyed expression, like an adult who has to explain something difficult or unpleasant to a very young child or a developmentally-delayed adult. The worst was his "Republican response" to the State of the Union Address. I thought if I kept watching him, his features would slowly morph into those of a Basset Hound with an empty food dish.

[Kludge]

If you can get a straight answer from RonP in private, it will not be very positive. Ryan is not principled -- it's theatrics.

[AGRP]

Paul Ryan is a shill: http://www.thenorthwestreport.com/who-is-paul-ryan-who-is-ron-paul-similar-names-different-voting-record/

[payme_rick]

Yah, Glenn Beck was trying to have phone sex with Ryan on his show this morning... Heard Rick Perry was jealous...

He sure has one helluva name though... two of the greatest Texans known to man: Ron Paul and Nolan Ryan... makes me sick...

[demolama]

Wow I haven't read anything from lp.org since they gutted the party platform in 2006. Overall good piece though... Paul Ryan doesn't give me good vibes

[Brian4Liberty]

Yah, Glenn Beck was trying to have phone sex with Ryan on his show this morning... Heard Rick Perry was jealous...

He sure has one helluva name though... two of the greatest Texans known to man: Ron Paul and Nolan Ryan... makes me sick...

I have run into people who don't know the difference between Paul Ryan and Ron Paul. Then again, you see that kind of thing on Leno when he goes out on the street and questions people.

[Matt Collins]

This is my understanding of Paul Ryan's plan:


- It allows for 10 more years of deficit spending
- It adds between $5-11 TRILLION dollars to the national debt
- It spends a total of $40 TRILLION over the next 10 years
- It will REQUIRE the debt ceiling to be raised
- It's obviously an unbalanced budget (in fact it doesn't fully balance until the year 2040)
- It actually continues to increase spending over the next few years (it merely slows the rate of spending, not actually cutting spending anytime soon)
- It is still bigger than the budget we had under Bill Clinton

Am I right correct???