PDA

View Full Version : McConnell: All 47 GOP Senators Co-Sponsor New Balanced Budget Amendment




randomname
03-31-2011, 01:17 PM
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.) will announce on Thursday afternoon that all 47 Republican Senators have co-sponsored a “consensus Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” HUMAN EVENTS has learned exclusively. This year’s budget deficit is projected to be $1.6 trillion, and the national debt is currently $14.1 trillion.

The key provisions of the new balanced budget amendment (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42496) (BBA) are: Congress must pass a balanced budget; the President has to submit a balanced budget; spending is capped at 18% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP); “supermajority” vote (two-thirds of House and Senate) to raise taxes; and “new supermajority” vote (three-fifths of House and Senate) to raise the debt ceiling.

“We’ve been fighting to cut spending in the near-term and that’s why we’ll soon be proposing a balanced budget amendment. American families have to balance their budgets. So should their elected representatives in Washington. It’s not too much to expect that lawmakers spend no more than they take in,” McConnell said on the Senate floor Thursday morning.

Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, amendments require passage by two-thirds of the House and the Senate and ratification by three-quarters (34) of the states. The House passed a BBA in 1995. In 1997, a Senate BBA failed to pass by only one vote. The 1997 BBA was supported by 11 Democrats, four of whom are still in the Senate: Max Baucus (Mont.), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Herb Kohl (Wisc.), and Mary Landrieu (La.).

Senate Republicans have been divided for months between two different versions of the BBA, one co-sponsored by Sens. Orrin Hatch (Utah) and John Cornyn (Texas) and the other co-sponsored by Sens. Jon Kyl (Ariz.) and Mike Lee (Utah). There were 33 Republicans who supported the Hatch-Cornyn amendment, and 17 supported an amendment by Lee and Kyl. Other Senators had specific concerns about provisions in both versions of the BBA.

Two weeks ago, Senators Hatch, Cornyn, Lee, Kyl, and Pat Toomey (Penn.) announced a press conference to unveil their versions of the BBA. McConnell told them to call off the press conference until they had a united Republican conference in support of one final legislation.

Then, McConnell asked the principals in the BBA debate to go back and negotiate a unified version that took into account all the requests from members of the caucus. The final version which they are announcing on Thursday is co-sponsored by every Senate Republican.

The specific provisions of the consensus Senate BBA were obtained exclusively by HUMAN EVENTS. They are as follows:

1) Presidential Requirement to Submit a Balanced Budget: Prior to each fiscal year, the President must transmit to Congress a balanced budget that limits outlays to 18 percent of GDP.

2) Requirement to Pass a Balanced Budget: With the following limited exceptions, Congress must pass a balanced budget.

* Requires 2/3 of both Houses for a specific deficit for a fiscal year.

* Requires a majority of Congress for a specific deficit for a fiscal year during a declared war.

* Requires 3/5 of Congress for a specific deficit for a fiscal year during a military conflict declared to be “an imminent and serious military threat to national security” and the deficit must be limited to “outlays…made necessary by the identified conflict.”

3) 18 Percent Spending Cap: With the following limited exceptions, Congress must limit outlays to 18 percent of GDP.

* Requires 2/3 of both Houses for a specific excess above 18 percent for a fiscal year.

* Requires a majority of Congress for a specific excess above 18 percent for a fiscal year during a declared war.

* Requires 3/5 of Congress for a specific excess above 18 percent for a fiscal year during a military conflict declared to be “an imminent and serious military threat to national security” and the excess be limited to “outlays…made necessary by the identified conflict.”

4) Supermajority for Tax Increases: Establishes a new supermajority requirement for net tax and rate increases.

* Requires 2/3 of both Houses for any bill “that imposes a new tax or increases the statutory rate of any tax or the aggregate amount of revenue.”

* Excludes increases in revenue resulting from tax cuts.

5) Supermajority to Raise the Debt Limit: Establishes a new supermajority requirement for an increase in the debt limit.

* Requires 3/5 of both Houses to increase the debt limit.

* Requires a majority of Congress for a fiscal year during a declared war.

6) Congressional Enforcement and Use of Estimates: Provides for congressional enforcement and the use of estimates.

7) Limits on Courts: Prohibits courts from ordering revenue increases to enforce.

8) Effective Date: Becomes effective the fifth fiscal year after ratification.

The Republicans need 20 Democrats to reach the 67 vote threshold for passage. But, McConnell said this morning on the Senate floor that, “Democrats are already lining up against it.” The Senate voted on a non-binding amendment for a BBA, sponsored by Lee that got a vote of 58-40, picking up 11 Democrat votes. If that test vote would be an accurate measure for vote counting, then only nine more Democrats are needed to pass a BBA this year.

Outside the U.S. Captiol on Thursday, members of the Tea Party protested against excessive government spending by Congress. Leader McConnell went to the Senate floor to defend against attacks on the Tea Party this week by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-N.V.) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D.-N.Y.).

“At a time when the national debt has reached crisis levels, members of the Tea Party are asking that we stop spending more than we take in. In other words, they’re asking that lawmakers in Washington do what any household in America already does: they want us to balance our budget,” said McConnell. “And they do this because they know their history, and that the road to decline is paved with debt.”

http://ht.ly/4qBrA

sailingaway
03-31-2011, 01:39 PM
I want to see the actual text, when it comes to amending the Constitution. Rand/Lee's was fine, but I don't trust the rest of these guys to keep it pure.

Zippyjuan
03-31-2011, 01:41 PM
I would like to see them submit a balanced budget proposal. The proposal calls for spending to be no more than 18% of GDP. Today, with GDP at $14 trillion, that would be a $2.5 trillion budget. In the 2010 budget, $2 trillion was listed as "mandatory spending". That would leave $500 billion for everything else. So far, they have only proposed cutting $20 billion. To reach their "target", they need almost another $1 trillion (or 50 times) more in cuts. Yes, I am cynical that they are serious about wanting to achieve a balanced budget and are just engaging in political posturing. I hope they are serious- but once they get to discussing what to cut, they will fail to do anything significant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_States_federal_budget

Mandatory spending: $2.009 trillion (-20.1%)

$695 billion (+4.9%) – Social Security
$571 billion (−15.2%) – Other mandatory programs
$453 billion (+6.6%) – Medicare
$290 billion (+12.0%) – Medicaid
$164 billion (+18.0%) – Interest on National Debt
$11 billion (+275%) – Potential disaster costs
$0 billion (−100%) – Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
$0 billion (−100%) – Financial stabilization efforts

Discretionary spending: $1.368 trillion (+13.1%)

$663.7 billion (+12.7%) – Department of Defense (including Overseas Contingency Operations)
$78.7 billion (−1.7%) – Department of Health and Human Services
$72.5 billion (+2.8%) – Department of Transportation
$52.5 billion (+10.3%) – Department of Veterans Affairs
$51.7 billion (+40.9%) – Department of State and Other International Programs
$47.5 billion (+18.5%) – Department of Housing and Urban Development
$46.7 billion (+12.8%) – Department of Education
$42.7 billion (+1.2%) – Department of Homeland Security
$26.3 billion (−0.4%) – Department of Energy
$26.0 billion (+8.8%) – Department of Agriculture
$23.9 billion (−6.3%) – Department of Justice
$18.7 billion (+5.1%) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$13.8 billion (+48.4%) – Department of Commerce
$13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of Labor
$13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of the Treasury
$12.0 billion (+6.2%) – Department of the Interior
$10.5 billion (+34.6%) – Environmental Protection Agency
$9.7 billion (+10.2%) – Social Security Administration
$7.0 billion (+1.4%) – National Science Foundation
$5.1 billion (−3.8%) – Corps of Engineers
$5.0 billion (+100%) – National Infrastructure Bank
$1.1 billion (+22.2%) – Corporation for National and Community Service
$0.7 billion (0.0%) – Small Business Administration
$0.6 billion (−14.3%) – General Services Administration
$19.8 billion (+3.7%) – Other Agencies
$105 billion – Other

specsaregood
03-31-2011, 01:52 PM
I would like to see them submit a balanced budget proposal. The proposal calls for spending to be no more than 18% of GDP. Today, with GDP at $14 trillion, that would be a $2.5 trillion budget. In the 2010 budget, $2 trillion was listed as "mandatory spending". That would leave $500 billion for everything else. So far, they have only proposed cutting $20 billion. To reach their "target", they need almost another $1 trillion (or 50 times) more in cuts. Yes, I am cynical that they are serious about wanting to achieve a balanced budget and are just engaging in political posturing. I hope they are serious- but once they get to discussing what to cut, they will fail to do anything significant.


Many people have no self-control with what they eat unless they are "on a diet".
And politicians, well I'd figure it is easier to explain away cuts to your constituents because of the law/balanced budget amendment than voluntarily cutting -- which makes it look like you have no heart and heart and are CHOOSING to take their handouts away rather than HAVE TO.

But yeah, I'm skeptical as well.