PDA

View Full Version : CNN Segment on Libya Intervention Titled "The New World Order"



FrankRep
03-30-2011, 05:13 PM
CNN Segment On Libya Titled "The New World Order" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzTeLvJhPc)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzTeLvJhPc

Speaker: Richard N. Haass (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_N._Haass), the President of the Council on Foreign Relations!


http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/stories2011/10aMarch/2707-egypt1.jpg (http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/tna/subscriptions/1-year-standard-subscription.html)

2011 - Organized Chaos: Behind the Scenes in the Middle East (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/asia-mainmenu-33/6784-organized-chaos-behind-the-scenes-in-the-middle-east)

The Middle East uprisings may have surprised most people in the world, but globalist elites at the Council on Foreign Relations laid the groundwork for the spontaneous events.


http://thenewamerican.com/images/stories/US_News/2516coverstorycfr.jpg

2009: Council On Foreign Relations (http://thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/foreign-policy/1462)

During his presidential campaign, Barack Obama consistently promised Americans “change” and such promises aren’t new to the voting public as was seen with Carter and his Trilateral Commission group, chief among these the CFR. by James Perloff


http://www.shopjbs.org/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d/S/h/Shadows_of_Power_web.jpg (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0882791346)

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0882791346)


Does America have a hidden oligarchy? Is U.S. foreign policy run by a closed shop? What is the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)? It began in 1921 as a front organization for J.P. Morgan and Company. By World War II it had acquired unrivaled influence on American foreign policy. Hundreds of U.S. government administrators and diplomats have been drawn from its ranks - regardless of which party has occupied the White House. But what does the Council on Foreign Relations stand for? Why do the major media avoid discussing it? What has been its impact on America's past - and what is it planning for the future? (2008, 272pp, pb)
TNforPaul45
03-30-2011, 05:16 PM
(Holds hands over ears) It doesn't exist! It doesn't exist! It's a conspiracy theory! It doesn't exist!!
jkr
03-30-2011, 05:57 PM
well...that is kinda in their FACE!
ItsTime
03-30-2011, 05:59 PM
Treason with play by play coverage! USA f-ck yeah!
FrankRep
03-30-2011, 05:59 PM
Just remember, The "New World Order" is just a silly Conspiracy Theory.
Marenco
03-30-2011, 06:14 PM
(Holds hands over ears) It doesn't exist! It doesn't exist! It's a conspiracy theory! It doesn't exist!!

:D

http://www.clker.com/cliparts/Y/J/d/G/O/N/see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no-evil-hi.png
sailingaway
03-30-2011, 06:19 PM
MSDNC is a DNC mouth organ. Fox News tends to be a GOP mouth organ (lately, Fox Business not so much.) CNN seems to try to follow where the independents are.
MN Patriot
03-30-2011, 06:32 PM
The NWO architects are probably testing the waters to see how people respond by taking the NWO out into the open. Since most people are distracted with American Idol, March Madness and Lyndsey Lohan, they could care less about the UN, the IMF, the Fed, etc.

What are we supposed to do? Write to our NWO congressperson?
NewRightLibertarian
03-30-2011, 06:37 PM
The NWO architects are probably testing the waters to see how people respond by taking the NWO out into the open. Since most people are distracted with American Idol, March Madness and Lyndsey Lohan, they could care less about the UN, the IMF, the Fed, etc.

What are we supposed to do? Write to our NWO congressperson?

Exactly. Who are we supposed to alert of this conspiracy? The government? They're putting it in place. The police? They work for the government. You just have to keep informing people about it, and that's why this forum and organizations like JBS are so important.
Zippyjuan
03-30-2011, 07:59 PM
Meh. "New world order" does not necessarily mean One World Government- though it does to some people. Sometimes it simply means a change in the way things have been. Like the fall of the former Soviet Union was said to be the beginning of a New World Order and the end of the Cold War. It is entertaining to see how some people respond to hearing it though. But do carry on!
FrankRep
03-30-2011, 10:44 PM
Hide in Plain Sight (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/84021.html)

LewRockwell.com on CNN's "New World Order" Segment

March 30, 2011
BenIsForRon
03-30-2011, 11:12 PM
Meh. "New world order" does not necessarily mean One World Government- though it does to some people. Sometimes it simply means a change in the way things have been. Like the fall of the former Soviet Union was said to be the beginning of a New World Order and the end of the Cold War. It is entertaining to see how some people respond to hearing it though. But do carry on!

NO!!!!!! You got it wrong man! The NWO is fucking with us, don't you see! They called up the producers at CNN and said "Hey, let's drop a hint for the proles tonight! Let them know who's boss! MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... MWHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

I mean... duh.
doctor jones
03-30-2011, 11:33 PM
Does anyone think it's weird the CFR president is against the war in Libya?
FrankRep
03-30-2011, 11:51 PM
Does anyone think it's weird the CFR president is against the war in Libya?

Richard N. Haass appears to be against the war in Libya because it was poorly planned.


Libya: Too much, too late (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51647.html)

Richard N. Haass
3/21/11


This intervention is ill-advised for a number of reasons. Under almost any scenario, whether Qadhafi’s removal from power, his falling back and holding off as the U.N. resolution requires or his fighting on successfully, something more than the current international military effort —which now involves considerably more than just imposing a no-fly zone — will be required.

But who will maintain order? And who can prevent a continuation of the civil war? The likely answer to these and related questions is military forces from the outside. But forces from where and for how long and with what mission and at what cost? There is little evidence that any of this has been thought through.