PDA

View Full Version : Tom Woods agrees to debate Mark Levin [MOD NOTE: Levin never agreed]



emazur
03-27-2011, 07:56 PM
Can't confirm this but thought people would be interested. I don't see Tom Woods losing a debate to anybody
http://www.dailypaul.com/160519/breaking-news-tom-woods-accepts-invitation-to-debate-mark-levin

It has been confirmed from a trustworthy source that Tom Woods has accepted an invitation to debate Mark Levin. The location will possibly be in Southern California at the Reagan Library and the topic will be the War Powers Act. However, many of the details are still premature at this point. As of the time of this post, Mark Levin has been contacted about this event and his response is pending.

This would be a really interesting debate! I'll try to add more information about this as I get it.
freshjiva
03-27-2011, 07:58 PM
Wow! If this is true, this one will be epic.

Judge Napolitano should also bring the two together on his show to have such a debate.
Sola_Fide
03-27-2011, 08:01 PM
//
payme_rick
03-27-2011, 08:02 PM
it seems he's accepted an invitation that has also been extended to levin, but not yet accepted by levin... so "tom woods to debate mark levin" seems like a gun-jumping headline..
trey4sports
03-27-2011, 08:05 PM
I posted this facebook convo earlier. A 3rd party has asked TW to accept a debate between he and levin, and Woods accepted. Levin has not publicly accepted the request yet.
Zatch
03-27-2011, 08:11 PM
As of the time of this post, Mark Levin has been contacted about this event and his response is pending.


Um, so Levin hasn't even mentioned or hinted at a debate much less agreed to one.
Zatch
03-27-2011, 08:12 PM
Won't happen.
JK/SEA
03-27-2011, 08:15 PM
Won't happen.

oh, it'll happen, only Woods won't be allowed inside Levins broadcast booth.
acptulsa
03-27-2011, 08:18 PM
Well, I would reiterate that so long as he keeps calling our man Ru Paul we should call him Carl Levin. But now that I see the other Levin is a yellow bellied intellectual lightweight coward without a leg to stand on or a gonad to draw strength from, I guess I shouldn't insult the Democrat that way.
PreDeadMan
03-27-2011, 08:19 PM
Tom Woods will wipe the floor with Levin :)
acptulsa
03-27-2011, 08:28 PM
Tom Woods will wipe the floor with Levin :)

Hear that, Carl--er, Mark? Going to let him talk about you that way? Chicken$#!+.
anaconda
03-27-2011, 08:51 PM
Wow! If this is true, this one will be epic.

Judge Napolitano should also bring the two together on his show to have such a debate.

It would only be epic in the sense that there will never have been such a profound public embarrassment and humiliation of anyone previously.
anaconda
03-27-2011, 08:53 PM
Tom Woods will wipe the floor with Levin :)

Levin knows this and would consequently never agree to such a debate. Unless he's as stupid as he is uneducated. Which would be hard for him to match.
acptulsa
03-27-2011, 08:53 PM
'Will never have been'? Now, never say never. But yes, it will probably be on the scale of:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-7gpgXNWYI
FSP-Rebel
03-27-2011, 09:05 PM
Well, I would reiterate that so long as he keeps calling our man Ru Paul we should call him Carl Levin. But now that I see the other Levin is a yellow bellied intellectual lightweight coward without a leg to stand on or a gonad to draw strength from, I guess I shouldn't insult the Democrat that way.

lol
sailingaway
03-27-2011, 10:05 PM
It would be great if it DOES happen!

You should check out Jack Hunter's video on Levin's statements, if you haven't. It is on a different thread.
angelatc
03-28-2011, 07:53 AM
Well, I would reiterate that so long as he keeps calling our man Ru Paul we should call him Carl Levin. But now that I see the other Levin is a yellow bellied intellectual lightweight coward without a leg to stand on or a gonad to draw strength from, I guess I shouldn't insult the Democrat that way.

Carl Marx Levin?
acptulsa
03-28-2011, 07:56 AM
Vladimir Levin?
The Dark Knight
03-28-2011, 08:31 AM
Vladimir Levin? Yes thats it!
angelatc
03-28-2011, 08:34 AM
Vladimir Levin? Yes thats it!

Ding ding ding!
S.Shorland
03-28-2011, 10:28 AM
It's all over anyway
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/83536.html
If you subscribe to TW's facebook page you get all his business in your newsfeed.

What kind of World is it when people who set themselves up to be intellectuals can't be questioned and refuse to debate?
Matt Collins
03-28-2011, 10:41 AM
From his Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/TheKingDude):


Mark Levin purports to have read the debates of the Great Convention of 1787 and the ratification debates in the states and STILL conclude that the Framers of the Constitution gave explicit war making powers to the "Executive". This is wrong, wrong and wrong and Tom Woods explains it here: and I explain it here: http://www.mikechurch.com/Today-s-Lead-Story/the-phony-arguments-for-presidential-war-powers.html
Matt Collins
03-28-2011, 11:05 AM
null
freshjiva
03-28-2011, 11:19 AM
Mark Levin is playing with fire here.

The neocons in 2012 will begin to understand that to use the Constitution against any of the Liberty message's platform of sound money, no income taxes, nonintervention, and civil liberty is a fools game that will get demolished.
Lucille
03-29-2011, 10:36 AM
New facebook group: Mark Levin is scared to debate Tom Woods (http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_135760059830735)
Matt Collins
03-29-2011, 08:26 PM
Tom Woods was interviewed about Levin on national radio today!





http://www.mikechurch.com/images/stories/Allison/kd_interview_tom_woods.jpg (http://www.mikechurch.com/Public-Transcripts/interview-dr-tom-woods-to-war-powers-controversy.html)

http://www.mikechurch.com/Public-Transcripts/interview-dr-tom-woods-to-war-powers-controversy.html


The audio is on the left hand side of the page on the above link.
Matt Collins
03-30-2011, 08:52 AM
A clip of Tom Woods being interviewed on the Mike Church satellite radio show:





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upMV5ZyoxSw&feature=player_embedded