doodle
03-22-2011, 12:22 AM
There should be nothing wrong in itself to be married to "neocons' lawyer in chief". But when the mrs. like the mr. also advocates that President can make key military decisions without congressional approval, one has to say that the cabbage didn't fall far from the tree.
Obama Adviser Cass Sunstein Debates Glenn Greenwald on FISA Vote, Executive Power and Prosecuting White House Officials for War Crimes
LINK (http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/22/obama_adviser_cass_sunstein_debates_glenn)
Military Commissions
In 2002, at the height of controversy over Bush's creation of military commissions without Congressional approval, Sunstein stepped forward to insist that "[u]nder existing law, President George W. Bush has the legal authority to use military commissions" and that "President Bush's choice stands on firm legal ground." Sunstein scorned as "ludicrous" the argument from Law Professor George Fletcher that the Supreme Court would find Bush's military commissions without any legal basis.
If NYT claims are correct, both mr and mrs should be ashamed of their conduct.
Obama Adviser Cass Sunstein Debates Glenn Greenwald on FISA Vote, Executive Power and Prosecuting White House Officials for War Crimes
LINK (http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/22/obama_adviser_cass_sunstein_debates_glenn)
Military Commissions
In 2002, at the height of controversy over Bush's creation of military commissions without Congressional approval, Sunstein stepped forward to insist that "[u]nder existing law, President George W. Bush has the legal authority to use military commissions" and that "President Bush's choice stands on firm legal ground." Sunstein scorned as "ludicrous" the argument from Law Professor George Fletcher that the Supreme Court would find Bush's military commissions without any legal basis.
If NYT claims are correct, both mr and mrs should be ashamed of their conduct.