PDA

View Full Version : Obama wants Japan failed reactors to be built on Texas Coast! READ!




american.swan
03-14-2011, 03:19 PM
Tokyo Electric to Build US Nuclear Plants
The no-BS info on Japan's disastrous nuclear operators

Monday, March 14, 2011
for Truthout/Buzzflash

by Greg Palast

Texas plants planned by Tokyo Electric. Image:NINA
I need to speak to you, not as a reporter, but in my former capacity as lead investigator in several government nuclear plant fraud and racketeering investigations.

I don't know the law in Japan, so I can't tell you if Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) can plead insanity to the homicides about to happen.

But what will Obama plead? The Administration, just months ago, asked Congress to provide a $4 billion loan guarantee for two new nuclear reactors to be built and operated on the Gulf Coast of Texas — by Tokyo Electric Power and local partners. As if the Gulf hasn't suffered enough.

Here are the facts about Tokyo Electric and the industry you haven't heard on CNN:

The failure of emergency systems at Japan's nuclear plants comes as no surprise to those of us who have worked in the field.

Nuclear plants the world over must be certified for what is called "SQ" or "Seismic Qualification." That is, the owners swear that all components are designed for the maximum conceivable shaking event, be it from an earthquake or an exploding Christmas card from Al Qaeda.

The most inexpensive way to meet your SQ is to lie. The industry does it all the time. The government team I worked with caught them once, in 1988, at the Shoreham plant in New York. Correcting the SQ problem at Shoreham would have cost a cool billion, so engineers were told to change the tests from 'failed' to 'passed.'

The company that put in the false safety report? Stone & Webster, now the nuclear unit of Shaw Construction which will work with Tokyo Electric to build the Texas plant, Lord help us.

There's more.

Last night I heard CNN reporters repeat the official line that the tsunami disabled the pumps needed to cool the reactors, implying that water unexpectedly got into the diesel generators that run the pumps.

These safety back-up systems are the 'EDGs' in nuke-speak: Emergency Diesel Generators. That they didn't work in an emergency is like a fire department telling us they couldn't save a building because "it was on fire."

What dim bulbs designed this system? One of the reactors dancing with death at Fukushima Station 1 was built by Toshiba. Toshiba was also an architect of the emergency diesel system.

Now be afraid. Obama's $4 billion bail-out-in-the-making is called the South Texas Project. It's been sold as a red-white-and-blue way to make power domestically with a reactor from Westinghouse, a great American brand. However, the reactor will be made substantially in Japan by the company that bought the US brand name, Westinghouse — Toshiba.

I once had a Toshiba computer. I only had to send it in once for warranty work. However, it's kind of hard to mail back a reactor with the warranty slip inside the box if the fuel rods are melted and sinking halfway to the earth's core.

TEPCO and Toshiba don't know what my son learned in 8th grade science class: tsunamis follow Pacific Rim earthquakes. So these companies are real stupid, eh? Maybe. More likely is that the diesels and related systems wouldn't have worked on a fine, dry afternoon.

Back in the day, when we checked the emergency back-up diesels in America, a mind-blowing number flunked. At the New York nuke, for example, the builders swore under oath that their three diesel engines were ready for an emergency. They'd been tested. The tests were faked, the diesels run for just a short time at low speed. When the diesels were put through a real test under emergency-like conditions, the crankshaft on the first one snapped in about an hour, then the second and third. We nicknamed the diesels, "Snap, Crackle and Pop."

(Note: Moments after I wrote that sentence, word came that two of three diesels failed at the Tokai Station as well.)

In the US, we supposedly fixed our diesels after much complaining by the industry. But in Japan, no one tells Tokyo Electric to do anything the Emperor of Electricity doesn't want to do.

I get lots of confidential notes from nuclear industry insiders. One engineer, a big name in the field, is especially concerned that Obama waved the come-hither check to Toshiba and Tokyo Electric to lure them to America. The US has a long history of whistleblowers willing to put themselves on the line to save the public. In our racketeering case in New York, the government only found out about the seismic test fraud because two courageous engineers, Gordon Dick and John Daly, gave our team the documentary evidence.

In Japan, it's simply not done. The culture does not allow the salary-men, who work all their their lives for one company, to drop the dime.

Not that US law is a wondrous shield: both engineers in the New York case were fired and blacklisted by the industry. Nevertheless, the government (local, state, federal) brought civil racketeering charges against the builders. The jury didn't buy the corporation's excuses and, in the end, the plant was, thankfully, dismantled.

Am I on some kind of xenophobic anti-Nippon crusade? No. In fact, I'm far more frightened by the American operators in the South Texas nuclear project, especially Shaw. Stone & Webster, now the Shaw nuclear division, was also the firm that conspired to fake the EDG tests in New York. (The company's other exploits have been exposed by their former consultant, John Perkins, in his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.)
If the planet wants to shiver, consider this: Toshiba and Shaw have recently signed a deal to become world-wide partners in the construction of nuclear stations.

The other characters involved at the South Texas Plant that Obama is backing should also give you the willies. But as I'm in the middle of investigating the American partners, I'll save that for another day.

So, if we turned to America's own nuclear contractors, would we be safe? Well, two of the melting Japanese reactors, including the one whose building blew sky high, were built by General Electric of the Good Old US of A.

After Texas, you're next. The Obama Administration is planning a total of $56 billion in loans for nuclear reactors all over America.

And now, the homicides:

CNN is only interested in body counts, how many workers burnt by radiation, swept away or lost in the explosion. These plants are now releasing radioactive steam into the atmosphere. Be skeptical about the statements that the "levels are not dangerous." These are the same people who said these meltdowns could never happen. Over years, not days, there may be a thousand people, two thousand, ten thousand who will suffer from cancers induced by this radiation.

In my New York investigation, I had the unhappy job of totaling up post-meltdown "morbidity" rates for the county government. It would be irresponsible for me to estimate the number of cancer deaths that will occur from these releases without further information; but it is just plain criminal for the Tokyo Electric shoguns to say that these releases are not dangerous. Indeed, the fact that residents near the Japanese nuclear plants were not issued iodine pills to keep at the ready shows TEPCO doesn't care who lives and who dies whether in Japan or the USA. The carcinogenic isotopes that are released at Fukushima are already floating to Seattle with effects we simply cannot measure.

Heaven help us. Because Obama won't.

***

Greg Palast is the co-author of Democracy and Regulation, the United Nations ILO guide for public service regulators, with Jerrold Oppenheim and Theo MacGregor. Palast has advised regulators in 26 states and in 12 nations on the regulation of the utility industry.

Palast, whose reports can be seen on BBC Television Newsnight, is a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow for investigative reporting.

specsaregood
03-14-2011, 03:26 PM
American.Swan, so you worked on a government team?

kahless
03-14-2011, 03:28 PM
American-swan, can you format that post to make it more easily readable.

CaliforniaMom
03-14-2011, 03:37 PM
So, do you think the radiation released from Japan is a danger to the west coast of the US?

noxagol
03-14-2011, 03:49 PM
Wall of text crits your for over 9000

Fox McCloud
03-14-2011, 03:52 PM
http://www.gregpalast.com/no-bs-info-on-japan-nuclearobama-invites-tokyo-electric-to-build-us-nukes-with-taxpayer-funds/ the source seems to have an agenda...seems a bit dubious to me.

the nuclear problems experienced in Japan, right now, are being way overhyped.

EndDaFed
03-14-2011, 03:55 PM
Stop posting crazy e-mails that were sent to you.

AFPVet
03-14-2011, 04:00 PM
Thanks :)

raiha
03-14-2011, 04:44 PM
It is written by Geg Palast not American Swan lol.
Skulduggery and corruption is alive and well in the world and always will be. Tokyo Electric must have sinking feelings in stomach if the article is true. Palast does tend to know about these things. So what we need to know is whether the Japanese govt is complicit or not (if the story is true)

american.swan
03-14-2011, 05:33 PM
Sorry guys and gals, I posted that from my blackberry in a hurry. Palast is usually right. Remember "Don't Tase me bro". I've read two Palast books. The guy goes after GOP and DNC admins. He seems to be friends with the dude who wrote "confessions of an Economic Hitman" too. Worth reading his emails if you ask me.

pcosmar
03-14-2011, 05:39 PM
I doubt that they would be building 40 year old reactors or even copying designs that have been outdated that long.

Still it would be nice if there were American manufacturers, and jobs for people here.

anaconda
03-14-2011, 05:49 PM
http://www.gregpalast.com/no-bs-info-on-japan-nuclearobama-invites-tokyo-electric-to-build-us-nukes-with-taxpayer-funds/ the source seems to have an agenda...seems a bit dubious to me.

the nuclear problems experienced in Japan, right now, are being way overhyped.

Multiple explosions at a nuclear power plant "over-hyped?" Can you elaborate?

Zippyjuan
03-15-2011, 11:55 AM
The nuclear plant aproval process in the US is an incredibly long process. The two reactors for Texas were proposed long ago (well before Obama took office) and scheduled to finally start construction in 2012. Joe Lieberman says construction should be stopped and Obama says there is no reason not to proceed (how can you plan for a 9.0 earthquake?). The biggest problem now is that the Japanese company which was the biggest sponsor probably won't have the money to continue on the US projects after the problems they are facing now in Japan.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110315/tr_ac/8065482_fukushima_disaster_cast_doubts_on_south_te xas_nuclear_project_expansion

One of the problems is that the Tokyo Electric Power Company, which owns the Fugushima plant, was going to invest in the expansion of the South Texas Nuclear Project. NRG Energy, a majority partner in the expansion, was also going to rely on loan guarantees from the Japanese government. Naturally any thought of any Japanese entity investing in nuclear power is on hold for the foreseeable future.

Building nuclear power plants in the United States is a slow, tedious process in the best of times, with permits, license applications, financing, and then actual construction taking decades. Concern over Fukushima is likely to slow the process that is already at a crawl to something resembling stasis.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, ordinarily an advocate of nuclear power, has already called for a suspension in the building of new nuclear power plants in the United States pending an examination of what went wrong in Japan and how such can be avoided in the United States. There is very likely to be, if not a halt, at least a study of existing and planned plants to recommend further safeguards.

President Obama has stated that the Fukushima disaster has not altered his plans to expand nuclear power in the United States. Obama administration plans to shift to non fossil fueled power generation is largely dependent on nuclear power,

It can be pointed out that both the two existing reactors of the South Texas Nuclear as well as the two planned ones are of a more modern design that the Fukushima reactors. For one thing, unlike the Fukushima reactors, the STNP reactors have emergency power systems in separate, weather and earthquake proof buildings.



Interesting to see reactions. After the BP oilspill, people criticized halting all drilling for oil in the name of "energy independence". The current situation seems to be getting the opposite reaction.

pcosmar
03-15-2011, 12:18 PM
The current situation seems to be getting the opposite reaction.

Perhaps shutting down the electrical grid nationwide for 3 days would help put things in perspective.
;)

squarepusher
03-15-2011, 12:36 PM
The nuclear plant aproval process in the US is an incredibly long process. The two reactors for Texas were proposed long ago (well before Obama took office) and scheduled to finally start construction in 2012. Joe Lieberman says construction should be stopped and Obama says there is no reason not to proceed (how can you plan for a 9.0 earthquake?). The biggest problem now is that the Japanese company which was the biggest sponsor probably won't have the money to continue on the US projects after the problems they are facing now in Japan.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110315/tr_ac/8065482_fukushima_disaster_cast_doubts_on_south_te xas_nuclear_project_expansion


Interesting to see reactions. After the BP oilspill, people criticized halting all drilling for oil in the name of "energy independence". The current situation seems to be getting the opposite reaction.


you have to plan for that and worse

RM918
03-15-2011, 12:40 PM
Didn't GE build the reactors going nuts right now anyway?

Aratus
03-15-2011, 05:03 PM
GE built rather solidly given how massive the quake was, and then the tsnuami.
even so, we have the reactors being the major source of the regions electricity
and without "juice" we have people pumping seawater into the piping to cool the
structures, as the workers who are being RHAD exposed still dersperately labor
to keep them from full meltdowns. one plant had two explosions, there has been
ventings of the hot contaminated gasses. the workers are being heroic as they try
to contain the situation. this was not immediately planned for at all. lets now pray...

Aratus
03-15-2011, 05:06 PM
lets hope cold fusion becomes a reality a.s.a.p