PDA

View Full Version : Rand to be on Freedom Watch tonight



tangent4ronpaul
02-25-2011, 04:06 PM
FBN - tune in!
tangent4ronpaul
02-25-2011, 05:58 PM
//
tangent4ronpaul
02-25-2011, 06:56 PM
//
4 min warning....
payme_rick
02-25-2011, 07:25 PM
Dammit Judge, please knock the shit out of Hucklebeech!
HOLLYWOOD
02-25-2011, 07:39 PM
LIVE FOX FREEDOM WATCH CHAT: http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/freedom-watch/live-event/freedom-watchers
low preference guy
02-25-2011, 07:47 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NNKJ2iXgE&feature=feedu
low preference guy
02-25-2011, 07:57 PM
The Judge has balls.

Huckabee said something about marriage and the Judge answered something like: "This is the preacher in you talking, not the governor in you."
low preference guy
02-25-2011, 08:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVGV0BYoKgk&feature=feedu
PermanentSleep
02-25-2011, 08:43 PM
muahahahaha. Huck got owned. :D
Brett85
02-25-2011, 09:56 PM
muahahahaha. Huck got owned. :D

Nope. Huck was right on this. The Judge can claim all he wants that government subsidized gay marriage is somehow a "pro liberty" position, but it isn't.
RforRevolution
02-26-2011, 07:36 AM
Nope. Huck was right on this. The Judge can claim all he wants that government subsidized gay marriage is somehow a "pro liberty" position, but it isn't.

He didn't claim that. At 8:56, 9:17, and 10:45 he specifically says it's not the governments business; not that he supports government sanctioned gay marriage or any government approved marriage. Government is necessarily the opposite of liberty, therefore having it involved in marriage or having it define the terms of marriage is the anti-liberty position (big government) position.
Brett85
02-26-2011, 09:28 AM
He didn't claim that. At 8:56, 9:17, and 10:45 he specifically says it's not the governments business; not that he supports government sanctioned gay marriage or any government approved marriage. Government is necessarily the opposite of liberty, therefore having it involved in marriage or having it define the terms of marriage is the anti-liberty position (big government) position.

In that case he should support DOMA, as DOMA at least stops the government from expanding marriage.
payme_rick
02-26-2011, 11:42 AM
In that case he should support DOMA, as DOMA at least stops the government from expanding marriage.

The conversation had gone to government's involvement in gay marriage period, not just DOMA... The Judge took the liberty stance, The Huck took the social-con stance (the wrong one)...
runningdiz
02-26-2011, 11:46 AM
Nope. Huck was right on this. The Judge can claim all he wants that government subsidized gay marriage is somehow a "pro liberty" position, but it isn't.

I think you misunderstand his position. He was arguing for government to stay completely out of marriage.
Brett85
02-26-2011, 01:51 PM
I think you misunderstand his position. He was arguing for government to stay completely out of marriage.

Well he isn't very clear on that. He was also trying to pretend that keeping marriage the way it is right now somehow means that gays can't live together and that the government is coming into "their bedrooms." Utterly ridiculous.
Brett85
02-26-2011, 01:53 PM
The conversation had gone to government's involvement in gay marriage period, not just DOMA... The Judge took the liberty stance, The Huck took the social-con stance (the wrong one)...

This issue hardly has anything to do with "liberty" when we're not talking about throwing gays in jail or doing anything at all to interfere in their personal lives. Gays already have the right to live whatever kind of lifestyle they wish to live. People talk about this as a "liberty" issue as if we were debating whether sodomy should be legal or not.