PDA

View Full Version : National Review poll: Who Is Your Least-Favorite President besides Obama?




JohnEngland
02-21-2011, 11:02 AM
It's on the homepage. The options:

Buchanan, Wilson, T Roosevelt, Hoover, FD Roosevelt, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, HW Bush, Clinton, W Bush.

The leaders: Carter 55%, Wilson 14%, FD Roosevelt 11%. W Bush only on 2% at the moment...

http://www.nationalreview.com/

Jeremy
02-21-2011, 11:12 AM
Looks like people only know how to vote for presidents in their lifetime. Maybe they don't know history. lol

sailingaway
02-21-2011, 11:15 AM
Wilson, I guess.... FDR is close....

Anti Federalist
02-21-2011, 11:15 AM
Ummm, all of them?

Seriously, Obama doesn't even rank in the top ten, for me.

He's just another corporatist caretaker, no threat to the real power structure whatsoever and no different than Bush, that was no different from Clinton, that was no different than Bush, that really was no different than Reagan...and so on.

Lincoln, Wilson and FDR, in that order, were far and away much "worse" than these regime janitors occupying the Oval Office now.

Fredom101
02-21-2011, 11:17 AM
Why do neocons hate Carter so much?
It's laughable that Carter is running away with it, even over the likes of disasters like Wilson & FDR.
I voted for GW Bush just for fun.

Aratus
02-21-2011, 11:26 AM
wilson, FDR, johnson and clinton have to be added together to equal carter
and then we get to the few who opt "W" as i did or H.W or buchanan or nixon!!!
i was feeling sorta thrilled to see that herbert hoover and TR have zeros next to them!

ssantoro
02-21-2011, 11:51 AM
Wilson resided over the creation of the federal reserve, the creation of the IRS, and the 16th and 17th amendment. and takes the lead for most destruction of the constitution with FDR a close second for being instrumnetal in expanding the Commerce Clause beyond the limits of the founders intent.

South Park Fan
02-21-2011, 12:13 PM
Why isn't Lincoln an option? Would that contradict NRO's secular religion?

Rothbardian Girl
02-21-2011, 12:17 PM
Why is Carter even an option? Lol. There are plenty of worse presidents out there than Carter.

Jeremy
02-21-2011, 12:18 PM
Why isn't Lincoln an option? Would that contradict NRO's secular religion?

He got 2nd place in their best president poll.

lester1/2jr
02-21-2011, 12:21 PM
Bush was certainly the worst in my lifetime. I can't imagine there will ever be a president as consistently bad as he. It was painful when he was up there on tv trying to say something.

Captain Shays
02-21-2011, 12:38 PM
Ummm, all of them?

Seriously, Obama doesn't even rank in the top ten, for me.

He's just another corporatist caretaker, no threat to the real power structure whatsoever and no different than Bush, that was no different from Clinton, that was no different than Bush, that really was no different than Reagan...and so on.

Lincoln, Wilson and FDR, in that order, were far and away much "worse" than these regime janitors occupying the Oval Office now.

I have the same order for worst. Johnson is next then Carter then Bush

Philhelm
02-21-2011, 02:40 PM
Wilson resided over the creation of the federal reserve, the creation of the IRS, and the 16th and 17th amendment. and takes the lead for most destruction of the constitution with FDR a close second for being instrumnetal in expanding the Commerce Clause beyond the limits of the founders intent.

Don't forget the League of Nations.

Batman
02-21-2011, 02:46 PM
I want to vote for Lincoln. This is ridiculous.

limequat
02-21-2011, 02:51 PM
I voted FDR over Wilson. Though Wilson presided over the creation of the Fed, he was repentent at the end of his life. I believe he was tricked. FDR was willful in what he did: Expanded Fed power, socialist insecurity, instigated american involvement in WW2. If I had a bullet and a time machine, FDR would be a top candidate.

AZKing
02-21-2011, 03:03 PM
I can't vote for all of them?