NY Times Article on CPAC makes no mention of Ron Paul

[cdc482]

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/hopefuls-and-no-shows-at-2012-cpac/

I always thought the media bias against RP was exaggerated a little, but this is crazy. Literally 1/3 of the events are hosted by RP, or an organization that supports RP. How could they not mention him at all?
If they still dismiss him after he wins CPAC, then there is a real f-ed up media bias against RP.

[specsaregood]

I always thought the media bias against RP was exaggerated a little, but this is crazy.
Welcome to the revolution. Make sure to tell your friends about it.

[ItsTime]

Welcome to the board.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9nOIusbDwI&feature=player_embedded

[cdc482]

I hope you guys boo Mitt Romney at CPAC

[hazek]

I always thought the media bias against RP was exaggerated a little, but this is crazy.

The single biggest reason why we have the world that we have today is media propaganda. And if we want to change that it should be our top priority to figure ways to fight and defeat it.

[New York For Paul]

The New York Times can be worthless at times. Other than Ronald Reagan, Ron Paul has had the biggest presence at CPAC. They sure know how to miss a story.

[sailingaway]

Good. Better than Politico saying 'RP is going all out to win this, so the others are going for 2d place....' When they have to announce the winner, (hoping Ron gets it), it won't have been diminished in advance. Just afterwards. :rolleyes: