Who is the lesser of 2 evils: Senator Clinton or Rudy?

[Starks]

Be honest.

[axiomata]

I never again will chose the lesser of the two evils. Because of that, I don't even see a point in making such a distinction. I have Ron Paul now.

[jumpyg1258]

3rd Party or write in Ron Paul. I refuse to vote for a lesser of two evils. Never have, never will.

[RJB]

...or Beelzebub or Lucifer or Satan or Mesphisto or...

[Starks]

You guys suck for not being able to answer a simple hypothetical question...

[RonPaulGetsIt]

We're all here because we want to take our country back from the globalist elite that currently control the system. Rudy, Hillary - totally irrelevant - like Dr. Paul said in his final answer tonight - the republicans used to stand for a humble foreign policy, conservative spending, and protecting civil liberties. There is no difference between any of the major candidates in either party on these issues except for one man, Ron Paul.

[Starks]

In a hypothetical situation, I'd vote for Hillary and then take a very cold shower afterward.

[RJB]

You guys suck for not being able to answer a simple hypothetical question...

I am being honest. I see no difference. If Dr. Paul doesn't get the primary, I'll vote for him in a third party. If he doesn't run at all I'll vote for someone else besides Clinton or Rudy. I WILL NOT THROW AWAY MY VOTE AND SUPPORT THE TWO PARTY MONOLITH. Both parties are killing my country. Voting third party says more than voting status quo.

[Cjays]

Rudy

[Starks]

As a New Yorker, I will say that Hillary and Schumer have been pretty decent senators.

[porcupine]

As a New Yorker, I will say that Hillary and Schumer have been pretty decent senators.

Sure, if you like socialism and foreign military adventurism.

Hillary is the worst of both worlds. She supports fascism AND socialism.

[BuddyRey]

Given the choice between the two of them, I guess I'd pick Hillary.

[rp4prez]

I'm buying my own island and starting a new country.. who's with me? :)

[devil21]

Both are equally evil. Why is this a thread?

[NoxTwilight]

Canada

[Man from La Mancha]

That is impossible to answer they are so equally evil and owned by the puppet masters. I could not sleep at night if voted for them.

.

[Kregener]

It is a tie.

[smtwngrl]

You guys suck for not being able to answer a simple hypothetical question...

That's because it is a trick question. :D

That's like asking if Bush is worse--or would Gore have been worse. After voting for the so-called lesser of two evils in 2000, I voted for (IMO) the worst president we've had.

They would both be equally bad. Hillary seems smarter, and Giuliani not too bright. But Republicans seem to fight against big government more when the Democrats are in power; when Republicans are, they rubberstamp everything.

[EvilEngineer]

If either of them win... I'm not sure I wouldn't be willing to commit a massive felony for what I'll be doing afterward. Though I need to evaluate who the VP is to see if it's viable.

[CurtisLow]

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5374/giulianihitlerms7.jpg

[grfgerger]

They're pretty much the same person.

[Malakai0]

I choose option 3.


Suicide?
No I'll vote libertarian if Ron loses the primary. But I think after all of this a lot less of us are going to bend over and take some of the new programs coming. I will refuse a real ID no matter what, make a big fuss and constitutional arguments. Try to get the paper and other people around me involved too (like Alex Jones did a long time ago with the biometric thumb prints @DMV).

That's where I'm drawing my personal limit anyway. If we lose this large community we've built can still be a force of protest against the establishment, inflation, and the war. Hell I'd be down for revolt ^^

But Ron is going to win the primary. If he loses it'll be because they rigged it. Here in florida we are using the same touch screen computers that all the scandal in '04 was about.

[Corydoras]

Rudy. I'm really scared of Hillarycare.

[NewEnd]

Hillary.

[manuel]

I really can't do that, I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. But I won't be staying at home. I plan on voting, but if the party doesn't nominate Ron I won't be able to vote Republican. And I certainly won't vote Democrat.

[johngr]

As a New Yorker, I will say that Hillary and Schumer have been pretty decent senators.

Non-responsive answer.

Hillary. If the US voters were foolish enough to vote that harpie in, she would make Katharine the Great look like sister Theresa. She is Medusa. Rudy is a mere minion in comparison.

The difference in the shit people all over the world would have to put up with is probably negligible. They're both in the same criminally insane people's pockets.

[Ron Paul Fan]

Neither. period. end of thread.

[Wendi]

Rudy, hands down, is the lesser of two evils. NOT that I would ever vote for him... THEY ARE BOTH EVIL in my opinion. Write in Ron Paul if necessary...

[kylejack]

Both bring big government. Rudy probably brings police state fascism as well.

"Freedom is about authority."
-Giuliani

Rudy is far worse.

[Lois]

I would vote for Hillary over Giuliani. At least she would carry on politics as usual and we would have some semblance of normalcy.

With Rudy, I think it would be 'anything goes'. We'd be in a Police State the next day, probably have another 911 carried out just as a reminder, total dictatorship, etc. He's too freaky. He doesn't seem to have any sense of right or wrong, totally heartless, inate evil. She's a woman -- there has to be some compassion in her somewhere. She has emotions, he's an empty shell.

[AlexAmore]

They are both equally evil. The difference is in their intelligence. Hillary is smarter and more charismatic. Rudy Giuliani....not so much. Therefore Hillary is more dangerous, while Rudy Giuliani would be like Return of the Bush, and he could perhaps be caught off guard. Oooor....Rudy saw how being and sounding like a dumbass gives neocons orgasms and he's just milking it for all it's worth. http://www.kapstadt-forum.de/images/shrug.gif

[huchahucha]

I honestly cannot choose - just two awful, awful choices. Another thing I think is awful is watching all the jack off cable news personalities with their company headquarters in New York getting excited, comparing a Rudy and Hillary showdown to a Mets and Yankees baseball game. If it comes down to that I will be staying home on election day, and I think most of America will be doing the same.
(And before anyone tells me I should write RP's name in, that is not allowed in my state, and third party candidates aren't allowed on the ballot)

[Daveforliberty]

Absoluietly, positively neither. I will vote for Ron Paul even if I have to write him in. And I will give my money to a write in campaign.

[AlexAmore]

(And before anyone tells me I should write RP's name in, that is not allowed in my state, and third party candidates aren't allowed on the ballot)

What Nazi state do you live in?

[redpillguy]

Getting people resigned into "voting for the lesser of two evils" is EXACTLY how they are manipulated.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_anthony__070903_the_ghosts_inside_th.htm

" the two-party system is the true cancer eating away at the heart of this republic. The notion that both sides have a grasp on absolute truth, politically and morally is one of the greatest lies perpetrated against the American people. "

[huchahucha]

What Nazi state do you live in?

The great state of Oklahoma

[Triton]

Be honest.Neither. If forced to make that choice, I will write in Ron Paul if I have to.

[jaumen]

Neither is the lesser of 2 evils. That's almost like asking... Who is the lesser of two evils? Hitler or Stalin?

[dude58677]

Of course Hilliary. She is a beltway poltician, voted for the Patriot Act, Iraq War, and and Military commission. Let's not forget that she supports universal health care and Rudy doesn't. Hilliary is also very arrogant and obnoxious.

[TuningIn]

Who is less evil?
At gun point, she takes money.
Rudy will take us.

I'm sorry for double posting in the Member works, but I hadn't seen this yet and this goes way better here.

[shrugged0106]

I love lamp

[dude58677]

Who is less evil?
At gun point, she takes money.
Rudy will take us.

I'm sorry for double posting in the Member works, but I hadn't seen this yet and this goes way better here.

You totally IGNORED my post. Hilliary takes money AND US!!!!!

[saku39]

Both are equally evil.

If I have to choose between those two, I will write Ron Paul's name in.

[TuningIn]

You totally IGNORED my post. Hilliary takes money AND US!!!!!

You totally IG
NORED my post. Hilliary
takes money AND US

You've got the 17 syllables for a haiku, but you totally IGNORED the 5,7,5 rule of haiku.

[Gilby]

If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, I will be writing his name in, unless this movement presents us with a third party option that we all can get behind (such as the libertarian party candidate).

If I really had to choose between Rudy and Hillary, it'd be very tough. Personally, I will probably move out of the country, at least temporarily during the chaos that both would present us with. So, the big question is which one would get the people to resist or see the reality of what government is. On the one hand, Rudy would be a dictator and will be seen that way, so the people may wake up. Whereas Hillary's programs may appear good at the beginning and deteriorate after several years. So, Rudy is better for achieving freedom quicker, but it won't be pretty in the short term.

[Captain Shays]

This is tough. On one hand, If you put a gun to my head and forced me to vote for either one of them, being more conservative minded, I would castit for Hillary. Like Ayn Rand says, give them the support fo their folly. Give them everything they want and more to show the outcome sooner rather than later.
If they want to impose minimum wages, as their approach to ending poverty then don't stop at the $7.00 per hour they want, give them $50.00 per hour and then no one will ever be poor again. Better yet. Make it $100.00 per hour.
Si let Hillary drive our country into complete failure with her policies and the people will get sick of it and revolt and the needed changes will come sooner rather than later. But then history proves that when Democrats are in power, we get into major wars. WWI, WWI, Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia, Somolia, Iraq, Columbia, Serbia, and Albania for instance and that scares me since Hillary is a war mongering, blood-thirsty bitch and my kids are of fighting age.
But so is Rude Rudy a war monger and a socialist and just as authoritarian, maybe more so than the Hildabeast.

So they have a gun to my head trying to force me to vote for either of them? Shoot me. Pull the F'in trigger now and get it over with.

[apropos]

They are both equally bad choices. Clinton will give us crushing taxes, government intrusion, and also will "take those profits and redistribute them". Rudy will give us open borders, business as usual, start grabbing guns, and probably get us in a war with Iran.

[Channing]

It doesn't matter which one is worse. It's like choosing the method to be executed by. You want neither.

[VoteRonPaul2008]

Rudy is the worst

[ksuguy]

That's like choosing between Hitler and Stalin. The one good thing that Hillary might do is that she might cause the country to implode slightly faster so we can start rebuilding after it all falls apart.

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I'll take Hillary Clinton over Rudy any day! Honestly though? They're both not worth getting out of the bed come election day.

[CodeMonkey]

Both are authoritarian imperialists...

I choose Rudy because his fiscal policies are a little bit more conservative.