PDA

View Full Version : Obama FCC Caves on Net Neutrality -- Tuesday Betrayal Is Assured Now




Agorism
12-20-2010, 11:01 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/obama-fcc-caves-on-net-ne_b_799435.html

and

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/12/fcc-rule/


Late Monday, a majority of the FCC's commissioners indicated that they're going to vote with Chairman Julius Genachowski for a toothless Net Neutrality rule.

According to all reports, the rule, which will be voted on during tomorrow's FCC meeting, falls drastically short of earlier pledges by President Obama and the FCC Chairman to protect the free and open Internet.

The rule is so riddled with loopholes that it's become clear that this FCC chairman crafted it with the sole purpose of winning the endorsement of AT&T and cable lobbyists, and not defending the interests of the tens of millions of Internet users.

Welcome to AT&T's Internet

For the first time in history of telecommunications law the FCC has given its stamp of approval to online discrimination.

Instead of a rule to protect Internet users' freedom to choose, the Commission has opened the door for broadband payola - letting phone and cable companies charge steep tolls to favor the content and services of a select group of corporate partners, relegating everyone else to the cyber-equivalent of a winding dirt road.

Instead of protecting openness on wireless Internet devices like the iPhone and Droid, the Commission has exempted the mobile Internet from Net Neutrality protections. This move enshrines Verizon and AT&T as gatekeepers to the expanding world of mobile Internet access, allowing them to favor their own applications while blocking, degrading or de-prioritizing others.

Instead of re-establishing the FCC's authority to act as a consumer watchdog over the Internet, it places the agency's authority on a shaky and indefensible legal footing -- giving ultimate control over the Internet to a small handful of carriers.

Obama's 'Mission Accomplished'

Internet users deserve far better, and we thought we were going to get it from a president who promised to "take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality." Watch now as he and his FCC chairman try to spin tomorrow's betrayal as another "mission accomplished."

Don't believe it. This bogus victory has become all too familiar to those watching the Obama administration and its appointees squander opportunities for real change. The reality is that reform is just a rhetorical front for industry compromises that reward the biggest players and K-Street lobbyists while giving the public nothing.

It's not the FCC chairman's job to seek consensus among the corporations that he was put into office to regulate. His duty is to protect Internet users.

More than two million people have taken action on behalf of Net Neutrality. Tomorrow, we'll all get the carpet yanked from beneath our feet.

Net Neutrality is the freedom of speech, freedom of choice issue of the 21st century. It's the guarantee of a more open and democratic media system that was baked into the Internet at its founding.

On Tuesday, Obama's FCC is going to sell that out.

http://twitter.com/TimKarr

TheTyke
12-21-2010, 03:13 AM
I hope that's the case, but I am concerned. The playbook of radicals says to always complain that not enough has been done. (Something our side needs to do, too) For example, when the Brady Bill was passed, instead of being happy, they complained that it didn't go far enough. So such complaints are not a sure sign of victory.

jtstellar
12-21-2010, 07:15 AM
libtards again think government regulating the net will lead to good and "fair" results. it's actually good to let their most precious thing be taken for a ride, well, potentially. i just know it will end up being mismanaged by judges and regulators that don't know jack shit about internet and couldn't care less. when fat-ass massive online player gamers and the like actually have their lives affected while being a couch potato, maybe they will start paying attention to politics. this has the potential to be the most important blowback 101

sailingaway
12-21-2010, 08:39 AM
I have been reading that it is going to be used to impose pricing by use, which will absolutely alter how the internet can be used. No more 'just browsing' not caring if a video might be on the page you open -- using precious megabytes. If you have ever had to pay roving charges on a data plan, you know what I mean. Even just your email updating on your phone, and including bulky spam can be a problem.

Regulatory capture. The companies are saying it is a 'compromise', meaning they want it dearly, because the market won't allow it. Regulatory price fixing.

I sure hope that is wrong, but other countries already have it.

But the morons who wrote the article don't get that this is the camel's nose under the tent, to regulate something they have ZERO authority to regulate.

Stary Hickory
12-21-2010, 09:15 AM
The internet works perfectly as is. It's gotten nothing but cheaper and faster.....the FCC has no authroity to do this as it has been shot down multiple times already. The court will not allow them to do it and neither will congress. Someone needs to make sure the FCC understand the internet is NOT it's territory.

pcosmar
12-21-2010, 09:24 AM
The internet works perfectly as is. It's gotten nothing but cheaper and faster.....the FCC has no authroity to do this as it has been shot down multiple times already. The court will not allow them to do it and neither will congress. Someone needs to make sure the FCC understand the internet is NOT it's territory.

The FACT that it has been shouted down several times, and keeps coming back is evidence that some power players really want it.

That in and or itself is good reason to oppose it.

Melissa
12-21-2010, 09:31 AM
You can watch the hearings live here http://reboot.fcc.gov/live/

specsaregood
12-21-2010, 09:39 AM
So, uhm it appears to me that they are upset because Net Neutrality is turning into exactly what many of us warned about. Is that analysis correct?

specsaregood
12-21-2010, 09:41 AM
The FACT that it has been shouted down several times, and keeps coming back is evidence that some power players really want it.
That in and or itself is good reason to oppose it.

Well a lot of these guys that just lost their jobs and many more that won reelection *just barely* probably would have won reelection if it wasn't for a free and open internet, yes?

Elwar
12-21-2010, 10:19 AM
They just wanted their foot in the door without much fuss...

they'll expand it later

Mach
12-21-2010, 10:32 AM
When they get the ok from congress?

Oh, wait, this video was from a few years ago.

FCC: Media-Oligarchy


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg5zodsZdds

Freedom 4 all
12-21-2010, 10:55 AM
Is this a good or bad thing for liberty? Does anyone have a succinct explanation for what exactly NN is?

Melissa
12-21-2010, 11:14 AM
Is this a good or bad thing for liberty? Does anyone have a succinct explanation for what exactly NN is?

Basically what I get out of it is the government saying we must regulate the internet to make sure it remains free. Not sure how you regulate something to make sure it is free but I am guessing it is like spending your way out of debt