PDA

View Full Version : House Democrats Win Procedural Vote on Tax Cuts




FrankRep
12-02-2010, 05:07 PM
http://www.kochsoft.com/tna/logo.png (http://www.thenewamerican.com/)
The New American Magazine on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-New-American-Magazine/146909368666979)



House Democrats cleared a procedural hurdle to advance a bill extending the Bush tax cuts to middle class families only, and in a procedural vote, the House voted 213 to 203 to advance the bill. by Raven Clabough


House Democrats Win Procedural Vote on Tax Cuts (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5365-house-dems-win-procedural-vote-on-tax-cuts)


Raven Clabough | The New American (http://www.thenewamerican.com/)
02 December 2010


Today, the House Democrats cleared a procedural hurdle to advance a bill extending the Bush tax cuts to middle class families only, prompting accusations from House Republicans that the Democrats are continuing to play political games. In a procedural vote, the House voted (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/02/lawmakers-negotiate-tax-cuts-house-plans-vote/) 213 to 203 to advance the bill. A full vote is expected later today.

For months, the debate over the Bush 2001 and 2003 tax cuts has been contentious, as Democrats indicated an interest in extending the tax cuts only for families making less than $250,000 while Republicans insist on extending the cuts across the board.

The John Birch Society (http://www.votervoice.net/core.aspx?aid=972&issueid=22915&atid=17947&siteid=0&app=GAC&isvisited=false) notes the imperative nature of extending all of the Bush tax cuts:



Respected economist Thomas Sowell and many others like him including Kurt Hauser from the Hoover Institution say the records show that cuts in tax rates do not translate into cuts in tax revenues. This was proven in the Coolidge, Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush presidencies.


Similarly, the United States Chamber of Commerce has staunchly opposed the Democrats’ proposal to limit the tax cut extensions, asserting that the proposal “fails to prevent a massive tax increase on small businesses.” The Chamber addressed a letter to Congress comprised of signatures from over 1,000 business that asked Congress to adopt a “long-term extension” on all the expiring tax provisions.

Additionally, Daniel Mitchell of the Cato Institute views the Democrats’ political maneuvering as a means to dupe the American people into accepting higher tax rates. “Class warfare tax rates on the rich … serve a very important political goal. Politicians understand that ordinary people will be less likely to resist oppressive tax rates if they think that those with larger incomes are being treated even worse. Simply stated, higher tax rates on the rich are a necessary precondition for higher tax rates on average taxpayers.”

House Republican Leader John Boehner described the actions of the Democrats as “chicken crap.”

Boehner explained, “Instead of beating around the bush, the Congress ought to act today to stop all the tax hikes, to cut spending, because it would reduce the uncertainty that’s affecting employers all across our country. And if the lame duck Congress is unable or unwilling to cut spending and stop all the coming tax hikes, the new majority in January will.”

Fox News reports that even if the bill were to pass in the House today, it would not stand a chance in the Senate. However, the Dems have voiced an interest in publicly staking out their position before making compromises with the GOP.

According to Fox News, “The White House held the door open Wednesday for a year-end compromise that would extend all the Bush-era tax cuts temporarily and the Senate’s top Republican said the only question that remained was how long current rates should be allowed before they expire.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell predicts that the Bush tax cuts will be extended for everyone, as the proposal has full GOP and some Democratic support. The only issue remaining, according to McConnell “is just how long to extend them,” as negotiations have focused on a one-to-three year extension.

As more talks are expected to take place today, President Obama contends that the Dems and Republicans will be able to reach a decision, though they may have to deal with some “lingering politics” in the process.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5365-house-dems-win-procedural-vote-on-tax-cuts

Zippyjuan
12-02-2010, 05:15 PM
Interesting article from CATO in 2003 on the Bush tax cuts and their impact on the deficit: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3190

The passage of President Bush's 10-year, $350 billion tax cut has put a bounce in the step of conservatives while casting a pall of gloom upon their liberal brethren. Yet it's unclear to us exactly why devotees of limited government are cheering while advocates of activist government are booing. The Left should be popping the champagne bottles and the Right should be wondering how they ended up being taken to the cleaners.

The Right's total abandonment of balanced budgeting is stunning. Sure, taxes are unpleasant to pay. But someone, someday has to pay for the government we're buying every year. Deficit spending just puts off the day of reckoning, but with interest. Trading off smaller taxes today for larger taxes tomorrow is a curious position for anti-tax conservatives to take.




So this is the tax debate in a nutshell. Both liberals and conservatives happily and without great argument sign off on the purchase of a $2.3 trillion dollar government with more spending surely to come. But liberals argue that we should put 11 percent of this year's tab on the national credit card while conservatives argue that we should put 17 percent of it on the national credit card. All for a "historic" tax cut that will reduce government's take on the private sector by all of 0.2 percent over 10 years.

Once we clear away the political smoke, it is clear that conservatives in Washington have completely abandoned their campaign against big government. Rather than tackle spending head-on, Republican politicians trot out tax cuts as a symbolic surrogate and Republicans respond with ideological gusto, forgetting the fact that tax cuts have nothing to do with the size of government. They have to do with how we pay for government.



I am still not seeing any real spending cuts being proposed. By either party. Boehner is talking about it but not offering any actual suggestions of what to cut and by how much. Nothing has changed.