View Full Version : 9/11 Building 7 TV ads to be run again!
sofia
11-27-2010, 03:15 PM
the first batch caught Geraldo Rivera's and Judge Nap's attention.
They are doing another go around!...please help
http://buildingwhat.org/
Anti Federalist
11-27-2010, 04:34 PM
Donated.
$50.
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
speciallyblend
11-27-2010, 08:36 PM
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
Bingo, Thread Winner!!
Daamien
11-27-2010, 08:46 PM
There's better causes for me to donate for. Good luck though.
sofia
11-27-2010, 09:52 PM
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
the TV ad shows the actual collapse of Building 7
eric_cartman
11-27-2010, 09:59 PM
i made a new documentary check it out... it's called "the end of fear" and it has the best evidence to prove that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers collapsed from controlled demolition. it features all these clips
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DC9F943B9510B32C
lynnf
11-27-2010, 10:04 PM
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
if people understood physics, they would be able to tell that it's controlled demolition just by looking at the films/tapes. so most people don't understand when you tell them the buildings fell in near-free-fall about 10 seconds, about the same time if a ball had dropped from the same height with nothing under it - meaning negligible resistance.
lynn
cubical
11-27-2010, 10:13 PM
Sorry, I haven't seen this topic discussed much on these boards(though I haven't been looking). Who or what do you guys believe was behind the towers falling?
mrsat_98
11-27-2010, 10:30 PM
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
NOSE IN NOSE OUT
Bingo, Thread Winner!!
YouTube - 9/11 Fraud: Nose In / Nose Out (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i73XmZUxnVo)
Sorry, I haven't seen this topic discussed much on these boards(though I haven't been looking). Who or what do you guys believe was behind the towers falling?
Check out the utube channel fringereality
Kregisen
11-27-2010, 10:33 PM
There's a big debate between truthers and some other group on youtube, and the other guys brought up something like it's impossible for it to be a demolition because of the noise that a controlled demolition would bring, didn't occur.
There's a big debate between truthers and some other group on youtube, and the other guys brought up something like it's impossible for it to be a demolition because of the noise that a controlled demolition would bring, didn't occur.
Not to mention wires throughout the building filled with tons and tons of visible explosives. I have my doubts about the official explanation, but doubts about this as well.
Dripping Rain
11-28-2010, 02:44 AM
NOSE IN NOSE OUT
YouTube - 9/11 Fraud: Nose In / Nose Out (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i73XmZUxnVo)
Check out the utube channel fringereality
this is just ridiculous. thank you for derailing a rather important thread just to serve your selfish ridiculous agenda. and causing it to go to HT very shortly. I hope the mods just surgically splice your post instead of the whole thread
Anti Federalist
11-28-2010, 02:57 AM
There's a big debate between truthers and some other group on youtube, and the other guys brought up something like it's impossible for it to be a demolition because of the noise that a controlled demolition would bring, didn't occur.
Many people reported hearing explosions at WTC7
Barry Jennings turned up dead not long after confirming this report.
http://www.infowars.com/key-witness-to-wtc-7-explosions-on-911-dead-at-53/
YouTube - Barry Jennings' account of WTC 7 explosions (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q)
mrsat_98
11-28-2010, 05:44 AM
this is just ridiculous. thank you for derailing a rather important thread just to serve your selfish ridiculous agenda. and causing it to go to HT very shortly. I hope the mods just surgically splice your post instead of the whole thread
I happened to have noticed the NOSE IN NOSE OUT event on the live broadcast of the FAKE Video we all also saw on 9/11/01 was was floored when I saw it discussed in September Clues.
To me there is no better evidence that something is amiss than NOSE IN NOSE OUT. So excuse me your absolute ignorance of the subject matter and simple physics is showing.
Please feel free to insert this in your pipe and smoke it.
YouTube - September Clues pt1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL9Ie_IbWUA)
The Camera mans statements.
YouTube - 911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman Suggests TV Fakery is Reality (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5PZxGsYNnY)
jmdrake
11-28-2010, 04:07 PM
They should produce a commercial that debunks the official story by using physics. It really shouldn't be that hard to do.
That would be an infomercial, not a 30 second spot. I'd like to see a "Lift Sibol Edmonds' gag order" commercial myself. Or a "Why did the government let the underwear bomber on the plane?" commercial.
squarepusher
11-28-2010, 04:13 PM
request offtopics immediately
That would be an infomercial, not a 30 second spot. I'd like to see a "Lift Sibol Edmonds' gag order" commercial myself. Or a "Why did the government let the underwear bomber on the plane?" commercial.
They can't get one of their Phd Engineers to state building 7 is the only high rise in the history of the world to free fall into itself without the use of detonators; that other high-rises located right next to the towers didn'f fall? They could flash pictures/diagrams that supports those statements in the background. .
That would take around 5-10 seconds of the 30 second spot, but what do I know? I'm not a producer :)
teacherone
11-28-2010, 04:19 PM
YouTube - Building Demolition (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUIdf4UJ3_4)
YouTube - Dallas Building Demolition (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdEnb-ifIbU)
^^^ They did a better job on building 7 ^^^ :D
teacherone
11-28-2010, 04:37 PM
please--- those videos show staggered flashes of light and huge sonic shocks as the charges are lit in sequence.
building 7 footage does not.
TonyFromTheBronx
11-28-2010, 04:38 PM
please--- those videos show staggered flashes of light and huge sonic shocks as the charges are lit in sequence.
building 7 footage does not.
there were massive explosions heard at base of building 7 prior to its fall.
jmdrake
11-28-2010, 04:41 PM
please--- those videos show staggered flashes of light and huge sonic shocks as the charges are lit in sequence.
building 7 footage does not.
There were no sonic shocks in the second video. And try as I may, I missed the "staggered flashes" but saw plenty of puffs of smoke.....(saw that on WTC 1,2 also. You can't see the bottom half of 7 on the collapse).
Dripping Rain
11-28-2010, 04:54 PM
I happened to have noticed the NOSE IN NOSE OUT event on the live broadcast of the FAKE Video we all also saw on 9/11/01 was was floored when I saw it discussed in September Clues.
To me there is no better evidence that something is amiss than NOSE IN NOSE OUT. So excuse me your absolute ignorance of the subject matter and simple physics is showing.
Please feel free to insert this in your pipe and smoke it.
YouTube - September Clues pt1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL9Ie_IbWUA)
The Camera mans statements.
YouTube - 911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman Suggests TV Fakery is Reality (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5PZxGsYNnY)
yikes. BTW THIS THREAD IS ABOUT BUILDING 7's mysterious collapse not WTCs 1 and 2. dont you think the pressure from a plane crashing through a building at 400+ mph would cause the glass in the range of at least 4 floors to collapse? How about instantaneous ignotion of Kerosene? Kerosene burns black smoke on ignition. couldnt it be the pressure plus flying glass and office shiz and the smoke?
Unlike you I dont know who did 9/11. Im skeptical and Id rather keep my suspicions to myself. Im sure you probably know everything and youre smarter than me and all but Id rather wait for an investigation into building 7 that will by proxy lead to a full investigation than promote conspiracy theories not only that turn off skeptics like myself but also help shut the door for any investigation into building 7.
Since this thread is about building 7 I respectfully ask the mods to surgically remove any posts unrelated that are meant to derail the substance of this thread and drive us off topic thank you
dannno
11-28-2010, 04:55 PM
please--- those videos show staggered flashes of light and huge sonic shocks as the charges are lit in sequence.
building 7 footage does not.
Are you aware that different types of explosives were found at the trade center sites than what are normally used for controlled demolition?
Normally you use the cheapest and most effective methods for building demolition, but when the goal is to keep it under wraps then other types of explosives may better to utilize.
However, I have seen video showing flashes in the wtc towers.
vita3
11-28-2010, 04:56 PM
I just gave them $50.
This is good citizen activism
jmdrake
11-28-2010, 05:52 PM
there were massive explosions heard at base of building 7 prior to its fall.
YouTube - Building 7 - Sound Evidence for Explosions (10 min) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlRmaUCE8sM)
Feeding the Abscess
11-28-2010, 07:04 PM
I happened to have noticed the NOSE IN NOSE OUT event on the live broadcast of the FAKE Video we all also saw on 9/11/01 was was floored when I saw it discussed in September Clues.
To me there is no better evidence that something is amiss than NOSE IN NOSE OUT. So excuse me your absolute ignorance of the subject matter and simple physics is showing.
Please feel free to insert this in your pipe and smoke it.
YouTube - September Clues pt1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL9Ie_IbWUA)
The Camera mans statements.
YouTube - 911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman Suggests TV Fakery is Reality (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5PZxGsYNnY)
I'm cool with watching videos about this sort of thing, but two things:
1. The music in all of these need to go. It's not mysterious or scary. It's stupid.
2. The September Clues videos especially have long segments that are really disjointed and don't make much sense at all. Almost as if they were translated from another language or the person making the video doesn't know how to express their ideas (or doesn't understand them). In short, they come off as if a dude who lives in his mom's basement made them.
Can someone who has a decent understanding of video editing and production help make one of these videos? I can't in good conscience send this sort of amateur video, with music and all, to someone like my MIT-educated uncle and have him take it seriously.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.