PDA

View Full Version : Nobel Peace Prize Winner Obama Authorizes 59% Increase Nuclear Weapons Development




HOLLYWOOD
11-21-2010, 12:58 PM
Look at the New Boss... Worse than the Old Boss.

Obama appropriates $4 Billion more than requested by the US Senate Arms Services Committee and Secretaries, DOD's Robert Gates and DOS's Hillary Clinton's $80 Billion recommendation. This amount increases expenditures by 59% in Nuclear weapons development over the previous decade's $50 Billion spent.

http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre6ai5g4-us-obama-nuclear/

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/Obama

LISBON, Nov. 19, 2010 (Reuters) — President Barack Obama moved closer on Friday to a showdown with Republicans in Congress who have rebuffed his calls for the Senate to approve a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia by the end of the year.

Obama warned that failure to ratify the treaty would put at risk warming ties with Russia, which has helped impose tougher sanctions on Iran and allowed equipment destined for NATO forces in Afghanistan through its territory.
Speaking during a NATO summit, he showed no sign of backing down from his demand that the Senate move speedily to approve the treaty, despite Republicans saying they do not think there is enough time this year to resolve outstanding differences.
Obama has put the START treaty at the top of his foreign policy agenda, saying it is central to his efforts to "reset" U.S. relations with Russia and ensure there is proper monitoring of the former Cold War enemy's nuclear arsenal.
"This is a national security imperative of the United States," Obama said.
"We know that failure to ratify and move forward with new START will put at risk the substantial progress that has been made in advancing our nuclear security and our partnership with Russia on behalf of nuclear security."
Obama's statement appeared designed to keep up pressure on Republicans who have refused to endorse the treaty.
The new START agreement commits the United States and Russia to cutting deployed nuclear weapons by about 30 percent -- to no more than 1,550 -- in seven years. It also includes verification measures.
Obama won support from NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who said he would regret any delay to ratification of the treaty, which would "be damaging to security in Europe."
The White House has dismissed suggestions that the issue has become a test of Obama's presidency.
The Democratic president has suffered a number of domestic and foreign policy setbacks in recent weeks, including his party's loss of the U.S. House of Representatives in congressional elections.
OBAMA, MEDVEDEV TO MEET ON SATURDAY
Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser to Obama, dismissed the idea that Obama's struggle to get the pact past emboldened Republicans reflected badly on the president's credibility in NATO and internationally.
"We're going to continue to work with Republican senators as well as Democratic senators to get the START treaty passed this year," he told reporters.
Obama has assigned Vice President Joe Biden to try to enlist senators' support for the treaty. Ratifying it will require 67 votes in the 100-member Senate.
Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed the new arms agreement in April to replace the previous START accord, which expired last December.
The White House wants the Senate to bring the deal to a vote during the final weeks of the current Congress. If it is held over until next year, the Democrats' slimmed down majority in the Senate would make passage more difficult.
One obstacle is Senator Jon Kyl, the Republicans' point man on the treaty, who says more money should be spent to make sure existing U.S. nuclear stockpiles are well maintained.

The administration had moved to address Kyl's concerns about nuclear modernization by saying it will invest $84 billion over the next decade to upgrade U.S. nuclear forces.

The treaty must be approved by the Senate and the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before it goes into force. Medvedev has urged the Duma not to ratify it until U.S. Senate approval is certain.

New York For Paul
11-21-2010, 01:36 PM
I don't worry about russia so much as china.

Missile launch
http://www.businessinsider.com/califorina-missile-launch-2010-11

YouTube - Missile launch off LA coast (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHEURLMb5bw)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHEURLMb5bw

Zippyjuan
11-21-2010, 02:32 PM
Interesting. Reagan does it (talks arms control while greatly expanding the military and spending billions on new nuclear weapons) and gets praised. Obama tries to do it and gets criticized. The weapons do degrade over time. Just polictics.

HOLLYWOOD
11-21-2010, 02:47 PM
Interesting. Reagan does it (talks arms control while greatly expanding the military and spending billions on new nuclear weapons) and gets praised. Obama tries to do it and gets criticized. The weapons do degrade over time. Just polictics.

Do your research on NUKE life cycles... far far longer than conventional weapons. Standard rating is a 99 year shelf life.

Most is classified... so I understand your lack of knowledge in this field. As far as Reagan, The Cold War of outspending each other is over... the Soviet Union is out, the WARSAW PACT is gone, and most of the countries are now part of NATO.

Where's the PEACE dividends? $50+ Billion in Nuclear Weapons development under Bush, now another $84 Billion under Obama? Look at the New Boss... Worst than the Warmongering Old Boss Dubya Bush.

It's all smoke and mirrors nonsense by these Establishment imperial political parties and the biggest charade is on the Taxpayers: Nuclear Weapons development and procurements are a ripoff.

I professionally dealt with this and have been to all the National Labs and Weapons facilities. Get a TOP SECRET SCI clearance working for the Military Industrial Complex it will be quite the eye opener.

Zippyjuan
11-21-2010, 02:59 PM
The weapons cannot go without being updated for 100 years and be expected to work. Half of the tritium alone is gone (broken down/ decayed) in about twelve and a half years. The radiation (even shielded) also causes other components to decay faster- they actually have shorter lives than conventional weapons. So yes, I do suggest learing about it. Thank you.

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/nmbook/chapters/ch2.htm

2.10.1 Limited-Life Components (LLCs)
Some age-related changes affecting various nuclear warhead components are predictable and well understood. During Phase 6, these components are replaced periodically throughout the lifetime of the warhead and are called Limited-Life Components (LLCs). LLCs are similar to the components of an automobile that must be replaced at periodic intervals, such as oil filters, brake pads, and tires. These components are replaced during scheduled LLC exchanges (LLCEs). LLCs in any given warhead-type may include power sources, neutron generators, tritium reservoirs, and gas-transfer systems. These components must be replaced before their deterioration adversely affects warhead function and/or personnel safety.

Tritium
Tritium gas is used in nuclear weapons as a fusion fuel for “boosting” the nuclear yield. See Appendix A, Basic Nuclear Physics, for a more detailed discussion of nuclear weapon design and function. Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. Tritium has a 12.33 year half-life, which means that it decays at an annual rate-loss of 5.5 percent. For this reason, tritium reservoirs (also called tritium bottles) must be replaced at periodic intervals. The overall tritium inventory must be replenished to sustain the stockpile’s military capabilities.

HOLLYWOOD
11-21-2010, 03:32 PM
Propaganda Bullshit... Go get a clearance instead of reading this "Public Junk"


The weapons cannot go without being updated for 100 years and be expected to work. Half of the tritium alone is gone (broken down/ decayed) in about twelve and a half years. The radiation (even shielded) also causes other components to decay faster- they actually have shorter lives than conventional weapons. So yes, I do suggest learing about it. Thank you.

http://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/nmbook/chapters/ch2.htm (http://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/nmbook/chapters/ch2.htm)

Zippyjuan
11-22-2010, 01:59 PM
Are you saying the nuclear materials don't really have a "half life"?

If somebody is opposed to updating nuclear weapons, why would they also be opposed to a treaty to reduce the numbers of them? This in particular is confusing to me.

http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-04/battling-over-aging-nuclear-warheads?page=

Anxiety over the U.S. arsenal centers on the age of the warheads’ plutonium core, called the pit. This radioactive center triggers the explosion that is the source of a nuclear bomb's extraordinary power. When a bomb detonates, highly explosive material compresses the core, setting off an uncontrolled chain reaction that splits the nuclei of the plutonium atoms, releasing the energy found in up to half a million tons of TNT. If this plutonium-based process fails, the weapon does not explode.

Over time, the core loses mass and energy by emitting tiny particles through a process known as radioactive decay, and impurities build up in the core. The conditions required to start the explosive chain reaction are so precise, "there is always concern that if the core changes slightly, the compression might not go in a predictable manner," says Mark Sakitt, a nuclear proliferation expert at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island.

The degradation of this radioactive material could destabilize the cores to the point that the weapons detonate weakly or not at all, RRW proponents say.

"The worst-case scenario is that [the warhead] wouldn’t go off," says Smolen of the National Nuclear Security Administration. If the weapon does not explode, he adds, "the radioactive substance could be potentially recovered, reprocessed and used against you by the enemy."

To reduce this risk, RRW could combine a variety of safety features to keep active warheads out of terrorists’ hands. Just as seatbelts made cars safer for passengers, "technology now allows safety features into nuclear warheads," says Harvey of the Department of Energy.

smithtg
11-22-2010, 03:53 PM
Propaganda Bullshit... Go get a clearance instead of reading this "Public Junk"

NNSA, DOD - the "secret" part of government. All paid leeches submitting to the king

"just give us the money, and no, we are going to tell you what we do with it"

--- to the taxpayer