PDA

View Full Version : airports consider congressmans ditch tsa




anarchy
11-19-2010, 11:41 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/19/airports-consider-congressmans-ditch-tsa/

HOLLYWOOD
11-19-2010, 01:02 PM
Airports we be very slow in making chances, so a national BOYCOTT of Airports and Airlines will bring them to their knees in doing what Americans and Travels demand. Especially since it violates all of our Rights.

Here's a great Wire if you want to see all the DHS propaganda and latest False Flag Ops.
http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/ (http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/)


Rep Chaffetz... Bill from 2009 against Porno Scanners
http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/house-limits-whole-body-imaging (http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/house-limits-whole-body-imaging)



Leading opposition to Chaffetz on the floor was Representative Dan Lundgren (R-California). “I have been through many, many pat-downs because I happen to have an artificial hip. Going through this (whole body imaging) at Reagan National Airport was so much quicker, so less intrusive of my privacy than what we go through now” with pat-downs, he said.
Lundgren added that whole-body imaging “can detect small IEDs (explosives), plastic explosives, ceramic knives and other objects traditional metal detection cannot detect,” and makes flying safer for everyone. He said, “This idea that someone is sitting in a little room waiting to see what you look like, frankly, is sort of overblown.”
Chaffetz replied, “I want to have as much safety and security on an airplane. I fly every week. But there comes a point in which in the name of safety and security we overstep that line and have an invasion of privacy. This happens to be one of those invasions of privacy.”
Representative Carol Shay-Porter (D-New Hampshire), who cosponsored the amendment with Chaffetz, also displayed large “naked” photos taken by whole-body imaging to the House to show how revealing they are.

fisharmor
11-19-2010, 02:52 PM
Bah, I didn't even finish reading it.
All that's going on is this congresscreep is trying to get his campaign donors on the short list of people to do the TSA mandated and directed screening instead of the TSA.
This has nothing to do with anything as far as we're concerned. In fact, it would probably be worse, since you'd have another layer of bureaucracy to deal with next time your three-year-old is molested in public at an airport.

GunnyFreedom
11-19-2010, 03:09 PM
Bah, I didn't even finish reading it.
All that's going on is this congresscreep is trying to get his campaign donors on the short list of people to do the TSA mandated and directed screening instead of the TSA.
This has nothing to do with anything as far as we're concerned. In fact, it would probably be worse, since you'd have another layer of bureaucracy to deal with next time your three-year-old is molested in public at an airport.

I'm guessing from this response that you don't actually know anything about Chaffetz, and are just speculating?