ghengis86
11-18-2010, 08:41 AM
"Well, of course it's intentional; the TSA intends to see you naked or feel you up if you want to fly in the United State.
My question more specifically; why is the TSA and Big Sis Napolitano pushing the American public regarding invasive and criminal 'security' procedures? There are new stories surfacing everyday about injustices suffered at the hands of our supposed protectors. A mother is sexually assaulted . A nun is groped. Even the TSA's employees are getting a taste of why generating naked pictures of unwilling participants is criminal. People are tweeting (Obama no less ), facebooking, blogging, YouTubing, creating new websites and making movies about their horrific experiences and their pledge to refrain from air travel until the porno-scanners and groping are eliminated. Even the MSM is forced to divert from its usual state-approved messages and give the backlash some coverage . The kiddie-porn generators don't work , they irradiate its victims , they wouldn't have even caught the "Underwear Bumbler ", the pat downs/groping won't even detect this type of terrorist, the pat downs are clearly sexual assault and an unwarranted search of your person and every attempt by any person to do harm on an airplane post-9/11 has been thwarted by the passengers after the government failed to detect the threat.
Why won't the TSA relent? It seems as though they're doubling down and digging in even deeper.
We just recently witnessed an election cycle where a large portion of the population began to regain their senses and voted for candidates both red and blue, who stood for liberty, freedom and smaller government (well, paid lip services to those ideals at least). Anti-government sentiment is at an all time high. Surprisingly, even principled civil-liberty-leftists and traditional small-government-righties are finding some common ground. Personally, I have yet to meet anyone who says, "Yeah, I love these new scanners and the fondling! My 13 year old daughter thinks it's swell too!", though from perusing the internets I have read comments to that effect (seriously, what's wrong with these people? why are they so afraid?).
So why won't the TSA relent? I put forth the proposition that whether attributed to intentional malice or stupid coincidence, the TSA has created the perfect crisis which, as they have indicated previously , will not be allowed to go to waste by our state rulers. The TSA is stirring the pot to usher in the most invasive level of police-state control imaginable; a biometrically monitored population that will make us nostalgic for 1984."rest of the article (http://elicryderman.com/2010/11/17/is-tsa-abuse-intentional.aspx)
and
"Well, that didn't take long.
CNN is running a peice about iris scanners being used in New York. You don't have to guess where the money is coming from and what it will eventually be used for, as the state's cards are in full view:
"Police put the price tag at $500,000, paid for through a U.S. Department of Homeland Security grant, which raises the question whether the device could be potentially used an anti-terrorism tool."rest (http://elicryderman.com/2010/11/18/right-on-cue-iris-scanners-making-news.aspx)
My question more specifically; why is the TSA and Big Sis Napolitano pushing the American public regarding invasive and criminal 'security' procedures? There are new stories surfacing everyday about injustices suffered at the hands of our supposed protectors. A mother is sexually assaulted . A nun is groped. Even the TSA's employees are getting a taste of why generating naked pictures of unwilling participants is criminal. People are tweeting (Obama no less ), facebooking, blogging, YouTubing, creating new websites and making movies about their horrific experiences and their pledge to refrain from air travel until the porno-scanners and groping are eliminated. Even the MSM is forced to divert from its usual state-approved messages and give the backlash some coverage . The kiddie-porn generators don't work , they irradiate its victims , they wouldn't have even caught the "Underwear Bumbler ", the pat downs/groping won't even detect this type of terrorist, the pat downs are clearly sexual assault and an unwarranted search of your person and every attempt by any person to do harm on an airplane post-9/11 has been thwarted by the passengers after the government failed to detect the threat.
Why won't the TSA relent? It seems as though they're doubling down and digging in even deeper.
We just recently witnessed an election cycle where a large portion of the population began to regain their senses and voted for candidates both red and blue, who stood for liberty, freedom and smaller government (well, paid lip services to those ideals at least). Anti-government sentiment is at an all time high. Surprisingly, even principled civil-liberty-leftists and traditional small-government-righties are finding some common ground. Personally, I have yet to meet anyone who says, "Yeah, I love these new scanners and the fondling! My 13 year old daughter thinks it's swell too!", though from perusing the internets I have read comments to that effect (seriously, what's wrong with these people? why are they so afraid?).
So why won't the TSA relent? I put forth the proposition that whether attributed to intentional malice or stupid coincidence, the TSA has created the perfect crisis which, as they have indicated previously , will not be allowed to go to waste by our state rulers. The TSA is stirring the pot to usher in the most invasive level of police-state control imaginable; a biometrically monitored population that will make us nostalgic for 1984."rest of the article (http://elicryderman.com/2010/11/17/is-tsa-abuse-intentional.aspx)
and
"Well, that didn't take long.
CNN is running a peice about iris scanners being used in New York. You don't have to guess where the money is coming from and what it will eventually be used for, as the state's cards are in full view:
"Police put the price tag at $500,000, paid for through a U.S. Department of Homeland Security grant, which raises the question whether the device could be potentially used an anti-terrorism tool."rest (http://elicryderman.com/2010/11/18/right-on-cue-iris-scanners-making-news.aspx)