PDA

View Full Version : Guy tells TSA agent "if you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." (with video)




Immortal Technique
11-14-2010, 12:40 AM
This guy is awesome. If only everybody stood up like he did. This needs to become mega-viral.

YouTube - TSA Screening, Terminal 2, SAN, Nov. 13, 2010 - part 1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7txGwoITSj4)

YouTube - TSA Screening, Terminal 2, SAN, Nov. 13, 2010 - part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RaFZ1CElU8)

YouTube - TSA Encounter trying to leave SAN (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwFh8HQttTQ)

TSA encounter at SAN
[These events took place roughly between 5:30 and 6:30 AM, November 13th in Terminal 2 of the San Diego International Airport. I'm writing this approximately 2 1/2 hours after the events transpired, and they are correct to the best of my recollection. I will admit to being particularly fuzzy on the exact order of events when dealing with the agents after getting my ticket refunded; however, all of the events described did occur.

I had my phone recording audio and video of much of these events. It can be viewed below.

Please spread this story as far and wide as possible. I will make no claims to copyright or otherwise.]

This morning, I tried to fly out of San Diego International Airport but was refused by the TSA. I had been somewhat prepared for this eventuality. I have been reading about the millimeter wave and backscatter x-ray machines and the possible harm to health as well as the vivid pictures they create of people's naked bodies. Not wanting to go through them, I had done my research on the TSA's website prior to traveling to see if SAN had them. From all indications, they did not. When I arrived at the security line, I found that the TSA's website was out of date. SAN does in fact utilize backscatter x-ray machines.

I made my way through the line toward the first line of "defense": the TSA ID checker. This agent looked over my boarding pass, looked over my ID, looked at me and then back at my ID. After that, he waved me through. SAN is still operating metal detectors, so I walked over to one of the lines for them. After removing my shoes and making my way toward the metal detector, the person in front of me in line was pulled out to go through the backscatter machine. After asking what it was and being told, he opted out. This left the machine free, and before I could go through the metal detector, I was pulled out of line to go through the backscatter machine. When asked, I half-chuckled and said, "I don't think so." At this point, I was informed that I would be subject to a pat down, and I waited for another agent.

A male agent (it was a female who had directed me to the backscatter machine in the first place), came and waited for me to get my bags and then directed me over to the far corner of the area for screening. After setting my things on a table, he turned to me and began to explain that he was going to do a "standard" pat down. (I thought to myself, "great, not one of those gropings like I've been reading about".) After he described, the pat down, I realized that he intended to touch my groin. After he finished his description but before he started the pat down, I looked him straight in the eye and said, "if you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." He, a bit taken aback, informed me that he would have to involve his supervisor because of my comment.

We both stood there for no more than probably two minutes before a female TSA agent (apparently, the supervisor) arrived. She described to me that because I had opted out of the backscatter screening, I would now be patted down, and that involved running hands up the inside of my legs until they felt my groin. I stated that I would not allow myself to be subject to a molestation as a condition of getting on my flight. The supervisor informed me that it was a standard administrative security check and that they were authorized to do it. I repeated that I felt what they were doing was a sexual assault, and that if they were anyone but the government, the act would be illegal. I believe that I was then informed that if I did not submit to the inspection, I would not be getting on my flight. I again stated that I thought the search was illegal. I told her that I would be willing to submit to a walk through the metal detector as over 80% of the rest of the people were doing, but I would not be groped. The supervisor, then offered to go get her supervisor.

I took a seat in a tiny metal chair next to the table with my belongings and waited. While waiting, I asked the original agent (who was supposed to do the pat down) if he had many people opt out to which he replied, none (or almost none, I don't remember exactly). He said that I gave up a lot of rights when I bought my ticket. I replied that the government took them away after September 11th. There was silence until the next supervisor arrived. A few minutes later, the female agent/supervisor arrived with a man in a suit (not a uniform). He gave me a business card identifying him as David Silva, Transportation Security Manager, San Diego International Airport. At this point, more TSA agents as well as what I assume was a local police officer arrived on the scene and surrounded the area where I was being detained. The female supervisor explained the situation to Mr. Silva. After some quick back and forth (that I didn't understand/hear), I could overhear Mr. Silva say something to the effect of, "then escort him from the airport." I again offered to submit to the metal detector, and my father-in-law, who was near by also tried to plead for some reasonableness on the TSA's part.

The female supervisor took my ID at this point and began taking some kind of report with which I cooperated. Once she had finished, I asked if I could put my shoes back on. I was allowed to put my shoes back on and gather my belongs. I asked, "are we done here" (it was clear at this point that I was going to be escorted out), and the local police officer said, "follow me". I followed him around the side of the screening area and back out to the ticketing area. I said apologized to him for the hassle, to which he replied that it was not a problem.

I made my way over to the American Airlines counter, explained the situation, and asked if my ticket could be refunded. The woman behind the counter furiously typed away for about 30 seconds before letting me know that she would need a supervisor. She went to the other end of the counter. When she returned, she informed me that the ticket was non-refundable, but that she was still trying to find a supervisor. After a few more minutes, she was able to refund my ticket. I told her that I had previously had a bad experience with American Airlines and had sworn never to fly with them again (I rationalized this trip since my father-in-law had paid for the ticket), but that after her helpfulness, I would once again be willing to use their carrier again.

At this point, I thought it was all over. I began to make my way to the stairs to exit the airport, when I was approached by another man in slacks and a sport coat. He was accompanied by the officer that had escorted me to the ticketing area and Mr. Silva. He informed me that I could not leave the airport. He said that once I start the screening in the secure area, I could not leave until it was completed. Having left the area, he stated, I would be subject to a civil suit and a $10,000 fine. I asked him if he was also going to fine the 6 TSA agents and the local police officer who escorted me from the secure area. After all, I did exactly what I was told. He said that they didn't know the rules, and that he would deal with them later. They would not be subject to civil penalties. I then pointed to Mr. Silva and asked if he would be subject to any penalties. He is the agents' supervisor, and he directed them to escort me out. The man informed me that Mr. Silva was new and he would not be subject to penalties, either. He again asserted the necessity that I return to the screening area. When I asked why, he explained that I may have an incendiary device and whether or not that was true needed to be determined. I told him that I would submit to a walk through the metal detector, but that was it; I would not be groped. He told me that their procedures are on their website, and therefore, I was fully informed before I entered the airport; I had implicitly agreed to whatever screening they deemed appropriate. I told him that San Diego was not listed on the TSA's website as an airport using Advanced Imaging Technology, and I believed that I would only be subject to the metal detector. He replied that he was not a webmaster, and I asked then why he was referring me to the TSA's website if he didn't know anything about it. I again refused to re-enter the screening area.

The man asked me to stay put while he walked off to confer with the officer and Mr. Silva. They went about 20 feet away and began talking amongst themselves while I waited. I couldn't over hear anything, but I got the impression that the police officer was recounting his version of the events that had transpired in the screening area (my initial refusal to be patted down). After a few minutes, I asked loudly across the distance if I was free to leave. The man dismissively held up a finger and said, "hold on". I waited. After another minute or so, he returned and asked for my name. I asked why he needed it, and reminded him that the female supervisor/agent had already taken a report. He said that he was trying to be friendly and help me out. I asked to what end. He reminded me that I could be sued civilly and face a $10,000 fine and that my cooperation could help mitigate the penalties I was facing. I replied that he already had my information in the report that was taken and I asked if I was free to leave. I reminded him that he was now illegally detaining me and that I would not be subject to screening as a condition of leaving the airport. He told me that he was only trying to help (I should note that his demeanor never suggested that he was trying to help. I was clearly being interrogated.), and that no one was forcing me to stay. I asked if tried to leave if he would have the officer arrest me. He again said that no one was forcing me to stay. I looked him in the eye, and said, "then I'm leaving". He replied, "then we'll bring a civil suit against you", to which I said, "you bring that suit" and walked out of the airport.

This video starts with my bag and belongings going through the x-ray machine.They're kind of long, and they don't show much, but the audio is really good.


Full Story Below
http://johnnyedge.blogspot.com/2010/11/these-events-took-place-roughly-between.html

Texan4Life
11-14-2010, 01:03 AM
"if you touch my junk" statement is at 3:45 on the first vid

dannno
11-14-2010, 01:28 AM
ya, fastforward to 3:26 to get some background on what was said beforehand, and watch through at least 6 minutes, he has another great conversation..

"OK I don't understand how a sexual assault could be made a condition of me flying.."

"This is not considered a sexual assault.."

"It would be if you weren't the government!"


...


TSA Lady: "We've all submitted to it!!"

Dude: "Well if you enjoy being touched by other people that's fine, but I only want to be touched by my wife and maybe my doctor down there.."

bwlibertyman
11-14-2010, 01:48 AM
Yeah this is pretty great. I would put some money on that they never called or sued him. They could never prove anything in court. No judge would say "okay you have to pay these guys 10,000 dollars because you didn't want to be groped". That's ludicrous. I love hearing stories like this.

squarepusher
11-14-2010, 01:54 AM
wow things getting ugly at the airports. Seems to be like the airlines don't like it either, since its scaring away their customers.

MyLibertyStuff
11-14-2010, 01:56 AM
Nice! Someone should edit the dead time out and subtitle it to make it viral!

dannno
11-14-2010, 01:58 AM
Nice! Someone should edit the dead time out and subtitle it to make it viral!

Seriously, they are way too long, but it's just cause there is too much waiting!!


It would go way more viral that way.

Humanae Libertas
11-14-2010, 02:55 AM
Wow, in a matter of 8 months San Diego International Airport has become a prison. I flew back in March (this year) and no pat downs, no naked body scanners, just went through the metal detector, that was it. Same for Newark Liberty Airport.

fj45lvr
11-14-2010, 03:24 AM
meanwhile the billionaires in lear jets have to be laughing at what the serfs go through.

amtrak and greyhound next?? when they get enough tax revenues?? lol

Mike4Freedom
11-14-2010, 03:30 AM
deleted

low preference guy
11-14-2010, 03:35 AM
"OK I don't understand how a sexual assault could be made a condition of me flying.."

"This is not considered a sexual assault.."

"It would be if you weren't the government!"


...


TSA Lady: "We've all submitted to it!!"

Dude: "Well if you enjoy being touched by other people that's fine, but I only want to be touched by my wife and maybe my doctor down there.."

that's at 5:15 for those who want to skip

RonPaulGetsIt
11-14-2010, 08:39 AM
I'm emailing orbitz, expedia, and a bunch of airlines today just to let them know my family will not be flying until these machines are removed.

RonPaulGetsIt
11-14-2010, 09:34 AM
Sent......
I have brought my family to Disney for the last 4 years. We have stayed at the Polynesian twice and the Beach Club twice.
I had intended to book my family of six at the Beach Club this year again for Spring break.
I regret to inform you that we will not be travelling down there anymore until the draconian TSA security procedures are changed.
I realize you do not set airline security procedures, but you are affected by them. Perhaps you should lobby congress to change them.
....

AGRP
11-14-2010, 10:48 AM
Bring a case against him?

Tyrants.

Matt Collins
11-14-2010, 10:58 AM
"if you touch my junk" statement is at 3:45 on the first vidWilling to bet someone will make a remix! ;):D

Matt Collins
11-14-2010, 10:59 AM
wow things getting ugly at the airports. Seems to be like the airlines don't like it either, since its scaring away their customers.
No, remember the airlines are subsidized by the federal government. Don't remember the airline bailout of the early '00s?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline#The_Airline_.E2.80.9CBailout.E2.80.9D

EvilEngineer
11-14-2010, 11:06 AM
Well, for $3000-5000 you can get a pilot license and say goodbye to all of this nonsense. Seems to me like the preferable route.

Get a license and offer your service to friends and family.

Kregisen
11-14-2010, 11:22 AM
Well, for $3000-5000 you can get a pilot license and say goodbye to all of this nonsense. Seems to me like the preferable route.

Get a license and offer your service to friends and family.

Assuming someone already invested the money into the very expensive pilot training classes, and already has a plane, you may be right. ;)

Chester Copperpot
11-14-2010, 11:51 AM
Yeah this is pretty great. I would put some money on that they never called or sued him. They could never prove anything in court. No judge would say "okay you have to pay these guys 10,000 dollars because you didn't want to be groped". That's ludicrous. I love hearing stories like this.

Can we get this assholes name and contact number? Id really like to call him and give him a piece of my mind as well as fining all the TSA agents and Mr. Silva.

EvilEngineer
11-14-2010, 11:51 AM
Assuming someone already invested the money into the very expensive pilot training classes, and already has a plane, you may be right. ;)

You can rent a small plane for about $50-80 an hour. Owning one can be very expensive from $100,000 - $50,000,000.

pacelli
11-14-2010, 11:52 AM
Bravo. If the guy is really lucky, they WILL file charges. He's already got a number of damages, and if he has legal charges filed against him, then he's getting into some real high dollar damages for a counter suit.

When he was at the ticketing counter (after leaving the TSA's catchment area), he asked if he could leave, and the guy in the sport coat said, "not quite". Therefore, he was detained. The nature of the guy's questions were to get him to "cooperate" by providing the prosecution with additional information to assist in their case, which the guy already told him, "...when we bring the case against you...".

Please keep this thread updated. If this guy wants to set a legal precedent, he's in prime position to do so.

nate895
11-14-2010, 11:54 AM
Bravo. If the guy is really lucky, they WILL file charges. He's already got a number of damages, and if he has legal charges filed against him, then he's getting into some real high dollar damages for a counter suit.

When he was at the ticketing counter (after leaving the TSA's catchment area), he asked if he could leave, and the guy in the sport coat said, "not quite". Therefore, he was detained. The nature of the guy's questions were to get him to "cooperate" by providing the prosecution with additional information to assist in their case, which the guy already told him, "...when we bring the case against you...".

Please keep this thread updated. If this guy wants to set a legal precedent, he's in prime position to do so.

I was waiting for someone to be brave and and fight to set a legal precedent for this. I hope and pray that the SCOTUS will rule that these machines are violations of our 4th amendment rights. As far as I know, the SC has never heard a case involving airport security at all.

Chester Copperpot
11-14-2010, 11:56 AM
I was waiting for someone to be brave and and fight to set a legal precedent for this. I hope and pray that the SCOTUS will rule that these machines are violations of our 4th amendment rights. As far as I know, the SC has never heard a case involving airport security at all.

then he will have to sue the TSA.. if the TSA brings suit against the victim and the court is going to find in his favor, the TSA will simply drop charges so the laws are not ruled unconstitutional..

nate895
11-14-2010, 12:00 PM
then he will have to sue the TSA.. if the TSA brings suit against the victim and the court is going to find in his favor, the TSA will simply drop charges so the laws are not ruled unconstitutional..

That is true. He would be able to sue for damages of not being allowed on the flight and improper prosecution. The SCOTUS likes to hear cases it has never heard before to set precedent. If it is appealed there, it will be heard. I hope the rules will be overturned.

I looked up airport security court cases, and it seems that either that haven't gone that far, or they have ended in guilty pleas. So, this will be precedent setting.

ItsTime
11-14-2010, 01:00 PM
People need to get people to start DEMANDING the TSA to show them a search warrant. I am sure someone is willing to start some sort of protest.

ItsTime
11-14-2010, 01:09 PM
What are they going to charge him with?

tropicangela
11-14-2010, 10:07 PM
this made front of drudge "SCANS, HANDS OR FINES"

phesoge
11-14-2010, 10:16 PM
perhaps we should organize a protest of the TSA and their GROPING/PORNo SCANNING......Organize a single day protest nationwide at all major US HUBS???

tropicangela
11-14-2010, 10:34 PM
YouTube - Nude Protest: Airport Body Scanners in Germany (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZSEf_4F3jk)

nobody's_hero
11-14-2010, 10:43 PM
Wow, I've never been to an airport and never plan to fly, and just when I thought that a 'fear of heights' or 'not being in control' was all the excuse I needed, they invented the TSA. But did you catch the announcement in that first video over the PSA intercom system? Around 3:54.

"Security is everyone's responsibility . . . "

We've reached 1984.

Aside:

Anyone here play Fallout 3? Does it remind you of Vault-Tec? Maybe they got the same guy to narrate airport security announcements?

Jeffersonian2012
11-14-2010, 11:34 PM
Ugh. I have to fly on Wednesday too. I really don't feel like going through this. Maybe I will just ask them if they have a search warrant. Since they won't I should tell them that they are violating the 4th amendment under the Constitution of the United States. Since I'm flying with a group though everyone in my group would hate me for doing that. Oh well, I should just do it when I fly during Christmas.

fj45lvr
11-15-2010, 12:49 AM
I bet there is an agreement stipulated in your ticket that you will go through TSA or Airport security. If you buy the ticket you are agreeing to the stipulations. (not sure but I suspect this to be the way it goes down).

This is then voluntary. If you don't like it don't fly from places that have this kind of screening. I don't think this is a property right as a customer.

dannno
11-15-2010, 01:05 AM
I bet there is an agreement stipulated in your ticket that you will go through TSA or Airport security. If you buy the ticket you are agreeing to the stipulations. (not sure but I suspect this to be the way it goes down).

This is then voluntary. If you don't like it don't fly from places that have this kind of screening. I don't think this is a property right as a customer.

The problem is that it is a government mandate and it is wrong.

You can do something like say they don't have a search warrant, but it's not going to get you through without going through the new procedures. Either you go through their shit or you end up in the back room like that guy in San Diego being threatened. I'm not saying what you should do, just know what you are in for and be prepared. You might consider preparing others that you are with so they aren't surprised when it happens, if you decide to go through with it.

Apparently there is a good chance you won't have to go through either the x-ray or the pat down. Perhaps somebody you are with will end up having to go through it and because of prior education you have given them they decide to assert their rights.

I imagine you've been reading up on all the TSA threads here recently?

dannno
11-15-2010, 01:23 AM
I imagine you've been reading up on all the TSA threads here recently?

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=268648

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=268769

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=268495

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=268182

Fredom101
11-15-2010, 02:43 AM
HO HOHOly shit batman!
This is what we ALL should be doing.
At least, all of us liberty lovers.
This guy rules, this guy is a hero.
This shit has to change.

BTW since when did San Diego put the body scanners in? Last time I flew out of there 2 weeks ago they weren't there. This shit is scary, but we need to take matters into our own hands.

pacelli
11-15-2010, 06:44 AM
Incidentally the today show is doing a story on this right now, and showed clips of the guy's video. They're talking to the admin. of the TSA, John Pistole.

He's saying that for children 12 and under that refuse the scanner, they are now not going to pat them down. Change of policy.

When questioned about adults getting felt up, tough shit basically. Lauer asked him about the 'national opt-out' day on 11/24 and Pistole said it was "irresponsible".

Predictably it is a pro-TSA piece.

Krugerrand
11-15-2010, 07:39 AM
I bet there is an agreement stipulated in your ticket that you will go through TSA or Airport security. If you buy the ticket you are agreeing to the stipulations. (not sure but I suspect this to be the way it goes down).

This is then voluntary. If you don't like it don't fly from places that have this kind of screening. I don't think this is a property right as a customer.

I could only agree IF this were a private company's own security stipulation for adults. One, this is a government requirement. As such is restricts one's freedom to travel. Secondly, I would have a problem with a private company's own security stipulation that mandates the sexual abuse of your children.

fisharmor
11-15-2010, 07:45 AM
He's saying that for children 12 and under that refuse the scanner, they are now not going to pat them down. Change of policy.

Yeah, let's not forget that a couple weeks of people publicly pointing out that the TSA's policy included child molestation is the only reason why they changed the policy.

It literally would never have occurred to these people that the American public may not have wanted their children felt up by complete strangers.

Krugerrand
11-15-2010, 08:11 AM
Yeah, let's not forget that a couple weeks of people publicly pointing out that the TSA's policy included child molestation is the only reason why they changed the policy.

It literally would never have occurred to these people that the American public may not have wanted their children felt up by complete strangers.

Plus - what is to stop TSA from changing their policy quietly if people stop paying attention?

moostraks
11-15-2010, 08:34 AM
I could only agree IF this were a private company's own security stipulation for adults. One, this is a government requirement. As such is restricts one's freedom to travel. Secondly, I would have a problem with a private company's own security stipulation that mandates the sexual abuse of your children.

Well said. However the damage is not limited to children. I had experiences in my past that would make these searches untenable for me. I am not the Lone Ranger on this issue. The type of psychological damage either the naked scan or a grope and fondle will cause is exceedingly large. For dh, knowing my history, this would be an impossible situation to not intervene. So for us air travel will be out until TSA stops this insanity.

Enough is enough. Starve them out if you think you can, but I fear the real intended outcome is to subjugate the independent American spirit. If you live in the city and fear intruders you don't leave your door unlocked and allow ingress and egress to unknown individuals while giving cavity searches to your relatives....

hazek
11-15-2010, 08:56 AM
What ever happened to the device I saw a video clip on like a year or two ago being developed where the person would step into it and air would burst from on side and be sucked into the other and then analyzed for for particles associated with explosives to determine if a person is a potential threat?

Also, wouldn't it be a good idea to equip planes with sleeping gas and gas masks for pilots in case of a hijacking so pilots could just gas the plane and land it safely since guns are a bit risky at higher altitude?

EDIT: found the video YouTube - Walking through the airport security air puffer in Denver (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-CKqlJjsaU)

Krugerrand
11-15-2010, 09:35 AM
What ever happened to the device I saw a video clip on like a year or two ago being developed where the person would step into it and air would burst from on side and be sucked into the other and then analyzed for for particles associated with explosives to determine if a person is a potential threat?

Also, wouldn't it be a good idea to equip planes with sleeping gas and gas masks for pilots in case of a hijacking so pilots could just gas the plane and land it safely since guns are a bit risky at higher altitude?

EDIT: found the video YouTube - Walking through the airport security air puffer in Denver (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-CKqlJjsaU)

I don't think Rudy Giuliani was selling those ones - thus airports must purchase the other ones.