PDA

View Full Version : [VIDEO] Rachel Maddow interviews Jon Stewart "The LIBERALS vs CONSERVATIVES Theater!"




purplechoe
11-12-2010, 01:47 AM
YouTube - "We've All Bought Into The LIBERALS vs CONSERVATIVES Theater!" Jon Stewart Interview pt.1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu_hEFYDfps)

YouTube - "Really? Do I Have To See A Guy Eat Another Guy's Brains On MSNBC?" Jon Stewart Interview pt.2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UunPJgBlT7U)

YouTube - "I Think Bush Believes Saddam Had Weapons Of Mass Destruction" Jon Stewart Interview pt.3 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jql0OinUiQ)

YouTube - "There Is No Honor In What I Do But I Do It As Honorably As I Can" Jon Stewart Interview pt.4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgvVMlQbSMU)

MyLibertyStuff
11-12-2010, 01:51 AM
Ehhh...so close Jon Stewart

silverhandorder
11-12-2010, 02:43 AM
I liked the interview.

V-rod
11-12-2010, 03:01 AM
Too bad most of his fans doesn't really take his advice.

BenIsForRon
11-12-2010, 03:13 AM
In the process of watching, just want to say that I'm glad Jon did this. I notice how he's calling for debate as opposed to the typical one sided bickering. Much like how Rand is calling for an actual debate in the senate on war spending and other spending. Too bad debate doesn't bring in the same ratings as demagoguery.

BenIsForRon
11-12-2010, 03:45 AM
Finished watching, and I'm a little disappointed in both people. Jon definitely deflected the importance of his show in the national discussion, and the responsibility that comes with it. While he can (and should) make fun of people and events in the country, he also needs to make sure he is not contributing to a false narrative. I think he's done a pretty good job with that, but he needs to realize that's what he's supposed to be doing.

Rachel on the other hand, refused to acknowledge the fact that even though her show is not as bad, the rest of her network is garbage and actually detrimental to the level of discourse in the country. In that sense, MSNBC is just like Fox News.

On the positive side, Jon really did put MSNBC in its place, it really has become Fox News for democrats.

sailingaway
11-12-2010, 04:13 AM
They are reduced to interviewing each other?

Jon is better than that.

Bman
11-12-2010, 04:29 AM
On the positive side, Jon really did put MSNBC in its place, it really has become Fox News for democrats.

That it has. The additions of Maddow, Shultz, and O'Donnell sealed that deal.

low preference guy
11-12-2010, 04:30 AM
That it has. The additions of Maddow, Shultz, and O'Donnell sealed that deal.

I disagree. MSNBC is too low to even compare it to Fox. Is there someone as awful at Olbermann at Fox? I don't think so.

Bman
11-12-2010, 04:40 AM
I disagree. MSNBC is too low to even compare it to Fox. Is there someone as awful at Olbermann at Fox? I don't think so.

I'm talking about that one is extremely left, the other is extremely right, and for the most part their side can do no wrong. I do agree MSNBC's crew is actually way further off their rocker's than the guys at FOX. There is far more civility at FOX news than there is at MSNBC.

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 04:41 AM
I disagree. MSNBC is too low to even compare it to Fox. Is there someone as awful at Olbermann at Fox? I don't think so.

http://crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2008/05/mediumoreillymad202ou4.jpg

low preference guy
11-12-2010, 04:45 AM
http://crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2008/05/mediumoreillymad202ou4.jpg

O'Reilly is the worst at Fox, but he isn't even close to being as bad as Olbermann.

Show me a clip analogous to the one below by O'Really:

YouTube - Attention-craving Olbermann calls Scott Brown a homophobic teabagging racist who is violent to women (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlpF7wG8vI0)


"In Scott Brown we have an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman and against politicians with whom he disagrees."

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 05:03 AM
O'Reilly is the worst at Fox, but he isn't even close to being as bad as Olbermann.

Show me a clip analogous to the one below by O'Really:


go to about 5:20

YouTube - Bill O's rant about NBC news (29-May'08 Thur) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnnnl9Q0B3Q)

O'Reilly and Olbermann, two sides of the same coin...

low preference guy
11-12-2010, 05:08 AM
go to about 5:20


come on! not even close.

i don't like o'reilly. but olbermann makes him look very sane.

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 05:09 AM
come on! not even close.

i don't like o'reilly. but olbermann makes bill look very sane.

don't be a pinhead... ;)

low preference guy
11-12-2010, 05:10 AM
don't be a pinhead... ;)

as soon as you stop being a homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman :D

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 05:12 AM
as soon as you stop being a homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman :D

:D

YouTube - Bill O'Reilly Flips Out (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY)


http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/06/oreilly.jpg

low preference guy
11-12-2010, 05:13 AM
:D

i've seen it. in my opinion, there is no contest.

AlexMerced
11-12-2010, 05:47 AM
Olbermann and O'Reilly are equally as bad, as is Schultz and Hannity, although I think O'Donnell is a new level of scary partisanship, he scares the crap out of me.

Omphfullas Zamboni
11-12-2010, 05:53 AM
Olbermann and O'Reilly are equally as bad, as is Schultz and Hannity, although I think O'Donnell is a new level of scary partisanship, he scares the crap out of me.

It seems like this O'Donnell guy takes himself seriously, intellectually. That's not a vibe I get from Schultz or Hannity.

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 05:59 AM
although I think O'Donnell is a new level of scary partisanship, he scares the crap out of me.

I agree...

YouTube - Hardball: O'Donnell Wants An Answer From Rep. Culberson (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDNw4EFUy4Q)

YouTube - Peter Schiff vs. Lawrence O'Donnell with Timers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYEtTkanDx0)

YouTube - Hardball: Buchanan vs O'Donnell on President Obama Being Welcomed at Notre Dame (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdykMM1W7I4)

akforme
11-12-2010, 09:15 AM
I disagree. MSNBC is too low to even compare it to Fox. Is there someone as awful at Olbermann at Fox? I don't think so.

It depends on who's in power and who's cheering vs. who's reporting on government. During the bush years when Fox was the cheerleaders, they were horrible, and Olbermann wasn't that bad. But now, it's just the opposite.

However, between hannity, Bill 'O' and Olbermann, I'd rather shove pencils in my ears than watch 5 mins of any of them. I stopped watching MSM 3 years ago and I will never go back.

Travlyr
11-12-2010, 09:34 AM
I stopped watching MSM 3 years ago and I will never go back.
Three years ago for me as well. People who watch/listen to any of these "reporters" are thought controlled wither they admit to it or not.

TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, books and many websites on the Internet tell people what is the important topic to think about, what to think about that topic, and who to vote for.

Mind control is real and the media is in control.

benhaskins
11-12-2010, 11:54 AM
The interview didn't really capture my interest. Imo it had the appearance of an intellectual debate w/o intelligence. Maybe I am biased though because I find both of them pretty annoying, especially Rachael Maddow.

Bruno
11-12-2010, 11:56 AM
The interview didn't really capture my interest. Imo it had the appearance of an intellectual debate w/o intelligence. Maybe I am biased though because I find both of them pretty annoying, especially Rachael Maddow.

I agree.

BenIsForRon
11-12-2010, 12:25 PM
The interview didn't really capture my interest. Imo it had the appearance of an intellectual debate w/o intelligence. Maybe I am biased though because I find both of them pretty annoying, especially Rachael Maddow.

Well, Maddow was very butthurt over the fact that Jon made fun of her, and couldn't drop the issue. I think Jon's points were very good though. All the news channels can do is be sensational and play up the political and personal aspects of the news. Instead of figuring out who's right, they talk about who said the best lie and who looked the best when saying it.

eqcitizen
11-12-2010, 12:44 PM
Jon Stewart is someone worth talking with and trying to persuade. He seems rational and truly interested in ideas and just hasnt been exposed to the right ones. He always treated Dr. Paul with respect and perhaps if Ron runs in 2012 he will really understand what liberty is all about (perhaps i am overly optimistic.)

purplechoe
11-12-2010, 07:09 PM
Jon Stewart is someone worth talking with and trying to persuade. He seems rational and truly interested in ideas and just hasnt been exposed to the right ones. He always treated Dr. Paul with respect and perhaps if Ron runs in 2012 he will really understand what liberty is all about (perhaps i am overly optimistic.)

I agree, go to about 6:20...

YouTube - Jon Stewart- "Then why did Fox News not treat Ron Paul better?" 2-4-10 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW4EdVh4TeY)

Daamien
11-12-2010, 11:44 PM
I'm talking about that one is extremely left, the other is extremely right, and for the most part their side can do no wrong. I do agree MSNBC's crew is actually way further off their rocker's than the guys at FOX. There is far more civility at FOX news than there is at MSNBC.

Really? I'd beg to differ. Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are insane. I try to avoid any of the prime-time "opinion" shows on both channels.

heavenlyboy34
11-13-2010, 12:53 AM
I disagree. MSNBC is too low to even compare it to Fox. Is there someone as awful at Olbermann at Fox? I don't think so.

uhhh..Bill O'Reily?

heavenlyboy34
11-13-2010, 12:55 AM
Three years ago for me as well. People who watch/listen to any of these "reporters" are thought controlled wither they admit to it or not.

TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, books and many websites on the Internet tell people what is the important topic to think about, what to think about that topic, and who to vote for.

Mind control is real and the media is in control.


Yep. The movie "Network" had it right.

fj45lvr
11-13-2010, 02:21 AM
I have to laugh in general about a serious discussion about major TV network news media outlets. I'd like to hear for once how the content is disapproved or approved by the network and how that chain of command actually works....

I would tend to bet that the bottom line is making advertisers happy with spending money to reach customers with what they want to "pimp"...PERIOD. Whatever it takes to make this money roll in.....if a network wants to be NASCAR oriented to get more revenue then so be it. At the end of the day it is about ENTERTAINMENT value (unless people really believe the US public does tune in to "learn" or try to find out what is happening.

How many hear about the federal reserve scam? (one of the most important issues of any out there) and what major outlets are making that heard? Dylan Ratigan? Beck? the Judge?

all outlets will surely cover Lindsay Lohan in court or a fat Playmate dying of pills. Sensationalism....voyeurism....sleaze. the MTV generation.


the internet is the future. TV is dino-media....thank god.