Reason
11-09-2010, 04:32 PM
I will be starting a parliamentary debate project next week and need to have one side arguing for increased security measures and one side arguing against.
My plan is to have a compromise that increases physical nationwide security ie: cargo container scanning & tighter borders while decreasing citizen surveillance and police state vs individuals style action.
Here is what I have so far...
NSA Wiretapping
Extraordinary rendition, torture, enemy combatant
Patriot act, warrant-less search and surveillance
Formation of DHS, militarization of local police depts.
~~
Cargo screening, radiological, increased source scrutiny
Physical asset protection, ie: reinforcement of critical infrastructure,
Cockpit security, reinforced cabin, tools for pilot defense, etc
My plan is to have a compromise that increases physical nationwide security ie: cargo container scanning & tighter borders while decreasing citizen surveillance and police state vs individuals style action.
Here is what I have so far...
NSA Wiretapping
Extraordinary rendition, torture, enemy combatant
Patriot act, warrant-less search and surveillance
Formation of DHS, militarization of local police depts.
~~
Cargo screening, radiological, increased source scrutiny
Physical asset protection, ie: reinforcement of critical infrastructure,
Cockpit security, reinforced cabin, tools for pilot defense, etc