PDA

View Full Version : American Airlines Pilots Revolt Against the TSA




Mach
11-07-2010, 02:07 AM
Show support for the APA (http://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/default.aspx). ;)





http://www.minyanville.com/dailyfeed/american-airlines-pilots-revolt-against/

The Atlantic Monthly's Jeffrey Goldberg, no fan of the TSA himself, got his hands on a letter from Captain Dave Bates, president of the Allied Pilots Association, which represents 11,000 American Airlines pilots.

Goldberg wonders:

"It is a source of continual astonishment to me that pilots -- many of whom, it should be pointed out, are military veterans who possess security clearances -- are not allowed to carry onboard their airplanes pocket knives and bottles of shampoo, but then they're allowed to fly enormous, fuel-laden, missile-like objects over American cities."

Anyway, here's the note sent to APA members by Captain Bates:

Fellow Pilots,

In response to increased threats to civil aviation around the world, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has implemented the use of Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) body scanners at some airport locations.

While I'm sure that each of us recognizes that the threats to our lives are real, the practice of airport security screening of airline pilots has spun out of control and does nothing to improve national security. It's long past time that policymakers take the steps necessary to exempt commercial pilots from airport security screening and grant designated pilot access to SIDA utilizing either Crew Pass or biometric identification. As I recently wrote to the TSA Administrator:

"Our pilots are highly motivated partners in the effort to protect our nation's security, with many of us serving as Federal Flight Deck Officers. We are all keenly aware that we may serve as the last line of defense against another terrorist attack on commercial aviation. Rather than being viewed as potential threats, we should be treated commensurate with the authority and responsibility that we are vested with as professional pilots."

It is important to note that there are "backscatter" AIT devices now being deployed that produce ionizing radiation, which could be harmful to your health. Airline pilots in the United States already receive higher doses of radiation in their on-the-job environment than nearly every other category of worker in the United States, including nuclear power plant employees. As I also stated in my recent letter to the Administrator of the TSA:

"We are exposed to radiation every day on the job. For example, a typical Atlantic crossing during a solar flare can expose a pilot to radiation equivalent to 100 chest X-rays per hour. Requiring pilots to go through the AIT means additional radiation exposure. I share our pilots' concerns about this additional radiation exposure and plan to recommend that our pilots refrain from going through the AIT. We already experience significantly higher radiation exposure than most other occupations, and there is mounting evidence of higher-than-average cancer rates as a consequence."

It's safe to say that most of the APA leadership shares my view that no pilot at American Airlines should subject themselves to the needless privacy invasion and potential health risks caused by the AIT body scanners. I therefore recommend that the pilots of American Airlines consider the following guidelines:

Use designated crew lines if available.

Politely decline AIT exposure and request alternative screening.

There is absolutely no denying that the enhanced pat-down is a demeaning experience. In my view, it is unacceptable to submit to one in public while wearing the uniform of a professional airline pilot. I recommend that all pilots insist that such screening is performed in an out-of-view area to protect their privacy and dignity.

If screening delays your arrival at the cockpit, do not cut corners that jeopardize the safety of the flight. Consummate professionalism and safety are always paramount.

Maintain composure and professionalism at all times and recognize that you are probably being videotaped.

If you feel that you have been treated with less than courtesy, respect and professionalism, please submit an observer report to APA. Please be sure to include the time, date, security checkpoint and name of the TSA employee who performed the screening. Avoid confrontation.

Your APA Board of Directors and National Officers are holding a conference call this week to discuss these issues and further guidance may be forthcoming.

While I cannot promise results tomorrow, I pledge to dedicate APA resources in the days and weeks to come to achieve direct access to SIDA for the pilots of American Airlines. In the meantime, I am confident that you will continue to exhibit your usual utmost professionalism as you safely operate and protect our nation's air transport system.

susano
11-07-2010, 02:21 AM
Expect Federal Fondling
If you "opt out" of the naked airport scanners

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/federal-fondling.html

I don't think the pilot's letter is nearly strong enough. He's just talking about pilots, too. Why he would be willing to subject himself to a private feel up, I don't know - especially considering that much of the baggage that goes in the cargo hold is not screened. This isn't about security it's about conditioning the population to tryanny. They hire the lowest level scum for TSA because it takes that degree of neanderthal to get off on naked scans and sexual assault of groping the "opt outs".

susano
11-07-2010, 02:26 AM
Pilot to TSA: 'No Groping Me and No Naked Photos'

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/roberts-m1.1.1.html

awake
11-07-2010, 06:52 AM
They will succeed in getting their class the privilege of opting out ; bypassing the scan and pat. This is always the way. The deemed ruling class gets to operate in more freedom from which was taken away from all others. You know how it works, cops can speed and you have to pay a fine for doing the same. They will simply pre-verify some way.

NiceGoing
11-07-2010, 07:45 AM
I don't think the pilot's letter is nearly strong enough. He's just talking about pilots, too. Why he would be willing to subject himself to a private feel up, I don't know - especially considering that much of the baggage that goes in the cargo hold is not screened. This isn't about security it's about conditioning the population to tryanny.

AGREE!

:mad:

james1906
11-07-2010, 08:20 AM
This isn't much of a revolt. If they were threatening a strike, that'd be one thing.