PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court Reacts to Violent Game Law




aGameOfThrones
11-03-2010, 12:14 AM
While an official ruling on today's U.S. Supreme Court hearing will have to wait, many of the justices questioned the proposed California law that would ban the sale of violent video games to minors.

In a transcript posted online, Zackery Morazzini, a California attorney general arguing for the law in today's proceedings, said the state should be allowed to regulate the sales of violent games, similar to the same sales restrictions placed on sexual material. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg quickly shot down his assertion, however.

"What's the difference?" said Ginsburg. "I mean, if you are supposing a category of violent materials dangerous to children, then how do you cut it off at video games?"

"What about films? What about comic books? Grimm's fairy tales? Why are video games special?"

Additionally, Justice Antonin Scalia questioned Morazzini's definition of "deviant, violent video games."

"What's a deviant -- a deviant, violent video game? As opposed to what? A normal violent video game? Some of the Grimm's fairy tales are quite grim, to tell you the truth," Scalia said.

"Are they okay? Are you going to ban them, too?"

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1131578p1.html

DamianTV
11-03-2010, 01:46 AM
The Popular Thing to Say will never need to be protected by the Freedom of Speech. The form of Freedom of Speech that will need the protection is the Unpopular Thing to Say, which it was also made the 1st Amendment, being focused on more than any other, and possibly the most important.

Krugerrand
11-03-2010, 05:54 AM
Sadly, many do-gooders would gladly ban Grimm.