LibertyIn08
10-31-2010, 06:34 AM
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs945.snc4/73833_461122488087_303392308087_5493302_2760206_n. jpg
From Robert:
"Flemig is traditionally an accurate pollster.
His result are very encouraging. They show that Roberts has 42.2%; Healey with 35.4%; Venturini with 4.8% and 16.4% undecided.
For me, this is great for several reasons. First, Roberts is below ...50% this late in the game. That is big for an incumbent.
Second, as pollsters will tell you, undecided votes trend away from incumbents at a ratio between 2 to 1 at worst and 3 to1 at best.
This is a race to the finish. With the margin of error considered, it could be anyone’s game.
The negative campaign of Roberts cost about $200,000 and this poll shows that it was not overly successful.
Given the high numbers of Republicans voting Democrats, the ability to rebound in the Congressional First District, and the senior vote being somewhat soft for Roberts, I am encouraged.
In this race, every vote will count."
From Robert:
"Flemig is traditionally an accurate pollster.
His result are very encouraging. They show that Roberts has 42.2%; Healey with 35.4%; Venturini with 4.8% and 16.4% undecided.
For me, this is great for several reasons. First, Roberts is below ...50% this late in the game. That is big for an incumbent.
Second, as pollsters will tell you, undecided votes trend away from incumbents at a ratio between 2 to 1 at worst and 3 to1 at best.
This is a race to the finish. With the margin of error considered, it could be anyone’s game.
The negative campaign of Roberts cost about $200,000 and this poll shows that it was not overly successful.
Given the high numbers of Republicans voting Democrats, the ability to rebound in the Congressional First District, and the senior vote being somewhat soft for Roberts, I am encouraged.
In this race, every vote will count."