PDA

View Full Version : Nimrada Randhawa (Nikki Haley) vs Vincent Sheheen SC Governor debate live at 7PM est




knarfxii
10-19-2010, 03:04 PM
http://www2.wspa.com/live/
SC Governor
Democratic nominee Vincent Sheheen and Republican candidate Nikki Haley - the two major candidates for South Carolina governor - will debate the issues Tuesday night in Spartanburg.

The candidates will discuss the issues face to face at the Chapman Cultural Center beginning at 7:00 p.m.

WSPA-TV, News Channel 7, will host the debate and broadcast the event live on television and online.

This will be the first televised debate between Haley and Sheheen. It will be held two weeks before the November 2 election.

With just two weeks remaining before the general election, the race is getting even tighter. Furman political scientist Don Aiesi says the debate is unlikely to change a lot of opinions, but could sway some votes in Sheheen's direction. "That's what a debate is all about," Aiesi says. "If you do a really bad job, it might make a difference."

In that respect, Aiesi says the biggest challenge for Haley, who has the lead in the polls, is to avoid a misstep. "Debates are not going to change minds. All the candidate that's leading has to do is not stumble."

On the other side, Aiesi says Democrat Sheheen must stick to the issues that matter the most to voters. "He might be able to pick a couple of issues he thinks are important to voters, that might convince people to move to his side."

News Channel 7's Tom Crabtree will moderate the debate. News Channel 7's Amy Wood will moderate the live chat portion of the debate which can be accessed on the front page of wspa.com by clicking here.

Some of the questions will be taken directly from those provided by viewers. You can submit a question at our Questions for the Candidates page by clicking here.

Jason Spencer, a reporter from our coverage partners at The Herald-Journal, Gina Smith of The State and Joe Hughes II of The Gaffney Ledger will also provide questions to the candidates.

The debate will be streamed live here.

Find out more about the candidates and the election on our Politics page by clicking here.

The auditorium will be at capacity for the debate.

knarfxii
10-19-2010, 03:11 PM
Bills she sponsored!
Who can and who cant shampoo your hair, Primary sponsor, Nikki Haley! http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/bills/3803.htm

I'm no fan of homeowner's associations. This bill may still suck though.

Nikki Haley is the Primary Sponsor to break contracts with your home owners associations http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/bills/4892.htm
This is TYRANNY! Probably unconstitutionalShe co-sponsored a bill that would delete many SC elections! http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/bills/3122.htm

TYRANNY!
Nikki Haley co-sponsored this: TO PROVIDE THAT MIRANDA RIGHTS NEED NOT BE READ http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/bills/3196.htmCorporate/Medical

TYRANNY!H 3136 A BILL TO ENACT THE "CERVICAL CANCER PREVENTION ACT"SO AS TO AMEND THE CODEhttp://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/bills/3136.htm

2005-2006 below

Violates Fourth and Fifth Amendments. They have flashlights

She also wanted to mandate me to turn my lights on as to make it easier for an officer to search my car with his eyes if I am stopped for anything! http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/3509.htm


TYRANNY!
forcing schools to have military recruiters http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4466.htm TYRANNY!mandating College kids to take yet, another course http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4774.htm TYRANNY!http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4837.htm infringing on gun rights



Somebody has some sense!This bill was so bad, it was never even given a sub-committee hearing. http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4929.htm

libertarian4321
10-19-2010, 04:27 PM
Bills she sponsored!

TYRANNY!
forcing schools to have military recruiters http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess116_2005-2006/bills/4466.htm

Okay, this one looked interesting, so I actually read the bill.

It says that schools that don't give military recruiters the same access that civilian job recruiters get will get a 10% reduction in state funding.

We can argue about whether that's a good law or not, but it's hardly "forcing" anyone to do anything, and its a far cry from "TYRANNY!!!!"

I didn't read the others, how many of those are you bull shitting us on as well?

knarfxii
10-19-2010, 04:32 PM
Okay, this one looked interesting, so I actually read the bill.

It says that schools that don't give military recruiters the same access that civilian job recruiters get will get a 10% reduction in state funding.

We can argue about whether that's a good law or not, but it's hardly "forcing" anyone to do anything, and its a far cry from "TYRANNY!!!!"

I didn't read the others, how many of those are you bull shitting us on as well?

Tyranny!