LibertyEagle
06-08-2007, 07:33 PM
There was an article in Human Events 2 days ago, by no less than the EDITOR, that completely trashed Dr. Paul's performance in the last debate. Human Events used to be known as a very traditionally conservative newspaper. Someone better than I needs to respond to this in a professional, reasoned, fact-based manner. Hopefully in a way that Dr. Paul would be proud.
This newspaper at least used to say they were for the following:
"It looks at events through eyes that favor limited constitutional government, local self-government, private enterprise and individual freedom. These were the principles that inspired the Founding Fathers. We think that today the same principles will preserve freedom America."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21005
"Ron Paul repeated his desire to cut and run, and the other Republicans didn’t buy it."
"When asked to identify George Bush’s greatest error none of the candidates, except for Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, were willing to attack the president. Paul renounced “pre-emptive war”, saying that we've abandoned the "just war" theory of Christianity. Paul is apparently willing to accept another terrorist strike rather than save American lives by taking out an imminent threat. Paul -- looking at the others -- condemned the idea of nuking Iran, which he said has done nothing to harm us and is no threat. The Iranian war against America, which began in 1979, can best be explained to Mr. Paul in two words: shut up."
-------- Ron Paul Media Matters --------
*** Please read forum guidelines before posting ***
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=658
Discussion Thread:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=4257
This newspaper at least used to say they were for the following:
"It looks at events through eyes that favor limited constitutional government, local self-government, private enterprise and individual freedom. These were the principles that inspired the Founding Fathers. We think that today the same principles will preserve freedom America."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21005
"Ron Paul repeated his desire to cut and run, and the other Republicans didn’t buy it."
"When asked to identify George Bush’s greatest error none of the candidates, except for Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, were willing to attack the president. Paul renounced “pre-emptive war”, saying that we've abandoned the "just war" theory of Christianity. Paul is apparently willing to accept another terrorist strike rather than save American lives by taking out an imminent threat. Paul -- looking at the others -- condemned the idea of nuking Iran, which he said has done nothing to harm us and is no threat. The Iranian war against America, which began in 1979, can best be explained to Mr. Paul in two words: shut up."
-------- Ron Paul Media Matters --------
*** Please read forum guidelines before posting ***
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=658
Discussion Thread:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=4257