PDA

View Full Version : Is Anybody Watching O'Donnell vs. Coons On CSpan?




Sola_Fide
10-13-2010, 07:01 PM
O'Donnell and Coons just tried to "out-neocon" each other on Afghanistan.


Very cringe-worthy guys.....

CaseyJones
10-13-2010, 07:01 PM
am now thanks for the heads up

w2992
10-13-2010, 07:04 PM
Odonnell is the ultimate neocon! Coons is way better on the war!

Sola_Fide
10-13-2010, 07:06 PM
O'Donnell just said Coons has a "marxist faith' hahaha!

ClayTrainor
10-13-2010, 07:07 PM
O'Donnell and Coons just tried to "out-neocon" each other on Afghanistan.


Very cringe-worthy guys.....

haha, dam fascists these days. :p

wormyguy
10-13-2010, 07:25 PM
O'Donnell just said Coons has a "marxist faith' hahaha!

Coons is a self-described Marxist.

Sola_Fide
10-13-2010, 07:39 PM
Oh, definitely...

Jcambeis
10-13-2010, 07:42 PM
Both are tools, conclusion reached after listening to their take on free speech.

Thomas
10-13-2010, 07:48 PM
they both suck

speciallyblend
10-13-2010, 07:55 PM
two pigs rolling in the mud gets old real quick!!

tangent4ronpaul
10-13-2010, 08:00 PM
Remember that O'Donell is a T-Party fav...

She's also the cutest candidate I've seen this cycle :)

-t

oyarde
10-13-2010, 08:04 PM
they both suck

Yes and one will vote for the current regime programs and one will not . Not is better .

AGRP
10-13-2010, 08:07 PM
Sounds horrific.

ClayTrainor
10-13-2010, 08:09 PM
Yes and one will vote for the current regime programs and one will not . Not is better .

That's like saying drinking piss is better than eating shit. :p

Don't Tread on Mike
10-13-2010, 08:24 PM
Remember that O'Donell is a T-Party fav...

She's also the cutest candidate I've seen this cycle :)

-t

agreed... def the milf-iest

oyarde
10-13-2010, 08:30 PM
That's like saying drinking piss is better than eating shit. :p

I see your point , but the current agenda must be stopped . We cannot sustain the economic damage .

ClayTrainor
10-13-2010, 08:42 PM
I see your point , but the current agenda must be stopped . We cannot sustain the economic damage .

Sure, I agree, but I wouldn't expect Mrs. O'Donnell to do that any better than Bush would.

AGRP
10-13-2010, 08:52 PM
I see your point , but the current agenda must be stopped . We cannot sustain the economic damage .

Obama was the best thing to ever happen to the liberty movement.

Just saying.

speciallyblend
10-13-2010, 08:58 PM
agreed... def the milf-iest

she won't even finger herself, your not getting any:)

oyarde
10-13-2010, 09:12 PM
she won't even finger herself, your not getting any:)

You believe that ?

tangent4ronpaul
10-13-2010, 09:24 PM
You believe that ?

Ah - just hypnotize her and tell her she's back in her college days - she was into witchcraft and free love back in the day... :D

-t

Wren
10-13-2010, 09:27 PM
Here is the debate if anyone even cares about watching it

YouTube - Delaware Senate Debate 10/13/10 Part 1 - Christine O'Donnell & Chris Coons (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKdJi5G-vEA&feature=sub)

YouTube - Delaware Senate Debate 10/13/10 Part 2 - Christine O'Donnell & Chris Coons (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__iAZtnM_gY)


The war issue comes up halfway through part 2

speciallyblend
10-13-2010, 09:54 PM
You believe that ?

no just being silly:P She is against one pleasing themselves!! If they are that prudish odds are your not getting past first base anytime soon:)

Sola_Fide
10-13-2010, 10:11 PM
*facepalm*



When are "conservatives" going to get it?

ClayTrainor
10-13-2010, 10:12 PM
When are "conservatives" going to get it?

If they "get it", they'll be libertarians. :p

Sola_Fide
10-13-2010, 10:16 PM
Oh yeah...

Brett
10-13-2010, 10:17 PM
Sure, I agree, but I wouldn't expect Mrs. O'Donnell to do that any better than Bush would.

We need opposition in government though. Coons would be better long term because he'll be opposition 4 years of the 6, where O'Donnell would be 2 years of opposition (assuming a republican wins in 2012)

but if Paul wins we would need O'Donnell in the senate definitely.

wormyguy
10-13-2010, 10:20 PM
We need opposition in government though. Coons would be better long term because he'll be opposition 4 years of the 6, where O'Donnell would be 2 years of opposition (assuming a republican wins in 2012)

Yes, but Coons would be a senator until he dies, while O'Donnell would have a very tough time surviving the following primary, much less the general election.

silentshout
10-14-2010, 12:48 AM
I can't watch..I know it will be bad.