PDA

View Full Version : California Looks at Selling State Property to Pay Bills




FrankRep
10-13-2010, 08:24 AM
California's state and local governments are going broke and public employees unions have demanded compensation and pension plans that are unsustainable; the government's answer is to sell its buildings. by Bruce Walker


California Looks at Selling State Property to Pay Bills (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/4865-california-sells-state-property-to-pay-bills)


Bruce Walker | The New American (http://www.thenewamerican.com/)
13 October 2010


California's state and local governments are going broke. Public employees unions have demanded compensation and pension plans that are unsustainable. Politicians have shown incredibly little courage in confronting a very real collapse of confidence in the governments of California.

Apparently, in the past, something inspired the illusion that California could defy the laws of economics. Surely part of that inspiration has been the astronomical rise in property values over the last several decades. Until this decade, California had been gaining congressional seats (showing a proportional rise in California’s share of the national population), and there appeared no end in sight.

Now that economc reality is slapping Californians in the face, one solution that has been offered to ameliorate the current crisis has been to sell 20 government buildings (http://www.cnbc.com/id/39626607) and then lease the buildings back from the investors. Governor Schwarzenegger has said that this will also relieve the state of the costs of upkeep for the buildings, as well as bring in about $2 billion to the state coffers. As a long term solution, this plan seems to have one obvious hole: Today the state owns these buildings and it has no rent obligation, but after the buildings are sold, then the state will need to rent office space indefinitely.

Two different groups — Beacon Economics and the nonpartisan legislative analyst’s office — project that the long-term effect will be to increase the cost to the state. The Beacon Economics estimate was paid for by the Service Employees International Union.

Considering this glaring problem, the ideal solution, given the bloated nature of state government in California, would be to privatize many government activities and simply end government activities in many of the buildings before selling them to the private sector. A transfer of jobs and operations from the public to the private sector would complement the transfer of the facilities in which the work takes place. That sort of truly imaginative and bold answer to California’s fiscal woes would also do much to increase confidence in bonds issued by state and local governments that would, in turn, reduce the interest rates on bonds issued and help create a positive snowball effect (rather than the negative snowball that has almost overtaken the state.)

California ought to be what it once was: a land blessed by God with mountains, beaches, rich farmlands, and wonderful climate. Only men who have asked for everything from government could have torn down this lovely, bountiful land and turned it into a place filled with uncertainty and failure. Maybe the sale of government property will be a hint to reduce government, more than just as an owner of real estate. If so, then the venture will reap rewards far greater than Governor Schwarzenegger would likely have imagined.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/4865-california-sells-state-property-to-pay-bills

Stary Hickory
10-13-2010, 10:06 AM
California has to face the music very soon. I am here with popcorn watching. It's a beautiful state which is actually chasing away people now.....it's amazing what an oppressive government can do to a population.

isrow
10-13-2010, 10:24 AM
Instead of leasing the buildings back they should sell them outright and fire everyone that works for them. The cost of those buildings is probably nothing compared to the benefits and pensions the workers in the building are getting from the government.

Vessol
10-13-2010, 10:28 AM
The less property stolen by the State, the better.

Brian4Liberty
10-13-2010, 10:30 AM
Instead of leasing the buildings back they should sell them outright and fire everyone that works for them. The cost of those buildings is probably nothing compared to the benefits and pensions the workers in the building are getting from the government.

There you go. Eliminate the employees first, then look at getting rid of buildings.

DamianTV
10-13-2010, 10:50 AM
They could always seize control of all the illegal immigrants, and since slavery is illegal, just sell them to someplace where slavery is legal. Im just not sure who would want to buy a shitload of state bankrupting welfare demanding criminals, regardless of price. Maybe McDonalds?

Zippyjuan
10-13-2010, 01:16 PM
Selling property and then leasing it back is terrible for long term budgets. Yes, it gets you money for this year but next year you don't have that income and not only have the shortfalls you would have had anyways but you have also added the expense of the leases which means that you have to cut expenditures (or raise taxes) by twice as much next year than you would have if you just made the cuts (or tax increases) this year.

denison
10-13-2010, 03:19 PM
They could always seize control of all the illegal immigrants, and since slavery is illegal, just sell them to someplace where slavery is legal.

It's not illegal it's just called cheap labor. And they're not illegals in more than you are. There ancestors were here long before you arrived.

bossman068410
10-13-2010, 03:26 PM
Why no enforce PROPERTY TAX on all federal lands?

Vessol
10-13-2010, 03:36 PM
Why no enforce PROPERTY TAX on all federal lands?

What is the State going to pay with, peanuts?

VBRonPaulFan
10-13-2010, 05:11 PM
What is the State going to pay with, peanuts?

nah man, i'm pretty sure they've been using paper IOU's for a while now

dannno
10-13-2010, 05:15 PM
the long-term effect will be to increase the cost to the state.

http://www.twolvesblog.com/images/stories/wh-double-facepalm.jpg



Instead of leasing the buildings back they should sell them outright and fire everyone that works for them. The cost of those buildings is probably nothing compared to the benefits and pensions the workers in the building are getting from the government.

+1